Effects of type of magnet attachment and implant angulation in two implant overdenture models
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of type of magnet attachment and implant angulation in two implant overdenture models. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Magnet attachments used in this study were flat and dome types (MGT5515, MGT5520D, Dentium Co., Seoul, Korea). Two implants with keepers were inserted in the resin blocks at a distance of 24 mm. For the first model, the implants were parallel to the vertical and perpendicular to the horizontal; for the second model, both were angulated 5 degrees to the mesial; for the third model, both were angulated 10 degrees toward the mesial. The retentive force was measured in both vertical and lateral directions. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 22.0 (α=.05). RESULTS. The flat type magnet attachment showed the highest lateral retentive force in the 20° divergent group (P<.05) and the dome type magnet attachment showed the highest lateral retentive force in the parallel group (P<.05). The vertical and lateral retentive force of the dome type magnet attachment was greater than that of the flat type magnet attachment in every direction (P<.05). CONCLUSION. Within the limitations of this study, the dome shape magnet attachment can resist vertical and lateral retentive force more superiorly than the flat type magnet attachment, regardless of angle, in the mandibular two implant model.
Abstract
PURPOSE. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of type of magnet attachment and implant angulation in two implant overdenture models. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Magnet attachments used in this study were flat and dome types (MGT5515, MGT5520D, Dentium Co., Seoul, Korea). Two implants with keepers were inserted in the resin blocks at a distance of 24 mm. For the first model, the implants were parallel to the vertical and perpendicular to the horizontal; for the second model, both were angulated 5 degrees to the mesial; for the third model, both were angulated 10 degrees toward the mesial. The retentive force was measured in both vertical and lateral directions. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 22.0 (α=.05). RESULTS. The flat type magnet attachment showed the highest lateral retentive force in the 20° divergent group (P<.05) and the dome type magnet attachment showed the highest lateral retentive force in the parallel group (P<.05). The vertical and lateral retentive force of the dome type magnet attachment was greater than that of the flat type magnet attachment in every direction (P<.05). CONCLUSION. Within the limitations of this study, the dome shape magnet attachment can resist vertical and lateral retentive force more superiorly than the flat type magnet attachment, regardless of angle, in the mandibular two implant model.
참고문헌 (16)
- Moghadam BK, "Magnetic retention for overdentures", J Prosthet Dent, 41, pp.26~29 (1979)
- Gillings BR, "Magnetic retention for overdentures. Part II", J Prosthet Dent, 49, pp.607~618 (1983)
- Feine JS, "The McGill Consensus Statement on Overdentures. Montreal, Quebec, Canada. May 24-25, 2002", Int J Prosthodont, 15, pp.413~414 (2002)
- Thomason JM, "Mandibular two implant-supported overdentures as the first choice standard of care for edentulous patients-the York Consensus Statement", Br Dent J, 207, pp.185~186 (2009)
- Takeshita S, "Stress analysis of mandibular two-implant overdenture with different attachment systems", Dent Mater J, 30, pp.928~934 (2011)
- Chopra V, "Breakaway forces of flat and domed surfaced Magfit implant magnet attachments", Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, 15, pp.7~12 (2007)
- Riley MA, "Magnets in prosthetic dentistry", J Prosthet Dent, 86, pp.137~142 (2001)
- Yang TC, "Attachment systems for implant overdenture : influence of implant inclination on retentive and lateral forces", Clin Oral Implants Res, 22, pp.1315~1319 (2011)
- Rabbani S, "Investigation of retentive force reduction and wear of the locator attachment system with different implant angulations", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 30, pp.556~563 (2015)
- Boeckler AF, "Mechanical properties of magnetic attachments for removable prostheses on teeth and implants", J Prosthodont, 17, pp.608~615 (2008)
- Uludag B, "Effects of implant angulations and attachment configurations on the retentive forces of locator attachment-retained overdentures", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 29, pp.1053~1057 (2014)
- "ISO 13017:2012/AMD 1:2015. Dentistry - Magnetic attachments - Amendant 1" (2015)[URL]
- Lahori M, "Comparative evaluation of bone in mandibular implant retained overdentures using delayed and immediate loading protocol : an in-vivo study", J Indian Prosthodont Soc, 13, pp.113~121 (2013)
- Cristache CM, "Five-year clinical trial using three attachment systems for implant overdentures", Clin Oral Implants Res, 25, pp.e171~e178 (2014)
- Koole S, "Contemporary undergraduate implant dentistry education : a systematic review", Eur J Dent Educ, 18, pp.11~23 (2014)
- 이은지, "The influence of the number and the type of magnetic attachment on the retention of mandibular mini implant overdenture", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 9(1), pp.14~21 (2017), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]