The influence of the number and the type of magnetic attachment on the retention of mandibular mini implant overdenture
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to compare the retention of mini implant overdenture by the number, the type of magnetic attachment, and the directions of applied dislodging force. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The experimental groups were designed by the number and type of magnetic attachment. Twenty samples were tested with Magden implants. Each attachment was composed of the magnet assembly in overdenture sample and the abutment keeper in a mandibular model. Dislodging forces were applied to the overdenture samples (50.0 mm/min) in 3 directions. The loading was repeated 10 times in each direction. The values of dislodging force were analyzed statistically using SPSS at 95% level of confidence. RESULTS. The retentive force of group 2 was greater than that of group 1 in both types of attachment in every direction (P < .05). Oblique retentive force of flat type magnetic attachment was higher than that of cushion type attachment in both groups (P < .05). In group 1, oblique retentive force showed the highest and anterior-posterior retentive force showed the lowest value in both attachment types (P < .05). In group 2, both types of attachment showed the lowest retentive force with anteriorposterior direction of dislodging force (P <.05). CONCLUSION. Proper retentive properties for implant overdenture were obtained, regardless of the number and type of magnetic attachment. In both types of magnetic attachment, the greater retentive force was attained with more implants. Oblique retentive force of flat type magnetic attachment was greater than that of cushion type. Among all subgroups, anterior-posterior retentive force was the lowest among three different directions of dislodging force.
Abstract
PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to compare the retention of mini implant overdenture by the number, the type of magnetic attachment, and the directions of applied dislodging force. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The experimental groups were designed by the number and type of magnetic attachment. Twenty samples were tested with Magden implants. Each attachment was composed of the magnet assembly in overdenture sample and the abutment keeper in a mandibular model. Dislodging forces were applied to the overdenture samples (50.0 mm/min) in 3 directions. The loading was repeated 10 times in each direction. The values of dislodging force were analyzed statistically using SPSS at 95% level of confidence. RESULTS. The retentive force of group 2 was greater than that of group 1 in both types of attachment in every direction (P < .05). Oblique retentive force of flat type magnetic attachment was higher than that of cushion type attachment in both groups (P < .05). In group 1, oblique retentive force showed the highest and anterior-posterior retentive force showed the lowest value in both attachment types (P < .05). In group 2, both types of attachment showed the lowest retentive force with anteriorposterior direction of dislodging force (P <.05). CONCLUSION. Proper retentive properties for implant overdenture were obtained, regardless of the number and type of magnetic attachment. In both types of magnetic attachment, the greater retentive force was attained with more implants. Oblique retentive force of flat type magnetic attachment was greater than that of cushion type. Among all subgroups, anterior-posterior retentive force was the lowest among three different directions of dislodging force.
참고문헌 (33)
- Burns DR, "Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part II--Patient satisfaction and preference", J Prosthet Dent, 73, pp.364~369 (1995)
- Gunne HS, "Masticatory efficiency of complete denture patients. A clinical examination of potential changes at the transition from old to new denture", Acta Odontol Scand, 40, pp.289~297 (1982)
- Tarbet WJ, "Effect of a denture adhesive on complete denture dislodgement during mastication", J Prosthet Dent, 44, pp.374~378 (1980)
- Burns DR, "Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part I-Retention, stability, and tissue response", J Prosthet Dent, 73, pp.354~363 (1995)
- 서민지, "자성 어태치먼트의 형태와 수에 따른 하악 임플란트 피개의치의 유지력에 대한 비교 연구", 석사, 보철학, pp.2007
- Mensor MC, "Removable partial overdentures with mechanical (precision) attachments", Dent Clin North Am, 34, pp.669~681 (1990)
- Cune MS, "Treatment outcome with implant-retained overdentures: Part II--Patient satisfaction and predictability of subjective treatment outcome", J Prosthet Dent, 72, pp.152~158 (1994)
- Engquist B, "A retrospective multicenter evaluation of osseointegrated implants supporting overdentures", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 3, pp.129~134 (1988)
- Gendusa NJ, "Magnetically retained overlay dentures", Quintessence Int, 19, pp.265~271 (1988)
- Behrman SJ, "The implantation of magnets in the jaw to aid denture retention", J Prosthet Dent, 10, pp.807~841 (1960)
- Schmitz JF, "Measurement of the efficiency of the platinumcobalt magnetic implant", J Prosthet Dent, 16, pp.1151~1158 (1966)
- Connor RJ, "Proplast-coated high-strength magnets as potential denture stabilization devices", J Prosthet Dent, 37, pp.339~343 (1977)
- Freedman H, "Magnets to stabilize dentures", J Am Dent Assoc, 47, pp.288~297 (1953)
- Sagawa M, "New material for permanent magnets on a base of Nd and Fe", J Appl Phys, 55, pp.2083~2087 (1984)
- Strnat KJ, "The hard-magnetic properties of rare earth-transition metal alloys", IEEE Trans Magnet, 8, pp.511~516 (1972)
- Highton R, "The interaction of a magnetically retained denture with osseointegrated implants", J Prosthet Dent, 60, pp.486~490 (1988)
- Walmsley AD, "Magnet retained overdentures using the Astra dental implant system", Br Dent J, 174, pp.399~404 (1993)
- Walmsley AD, "Magnetic retention in prosthetic dentistry", Dent Update, 29, pp.428~433 (2002)
- Flanagan D, "The mini dental implant in fixed and removable prosthetics: a review", J Oral Implantol, 37, pp.123~132 (2011)
- Tu CY, "Using mini dental implants to improve the stability of an existing mandibular complete denture in a patient with severe ridge resorption", J Prost Impl, 1, pp.48~52 (2012)
- Morneburg TR, "Success rates of microimplants in edentulous patients with residual ridge resorption", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 23, pp.270~276 (2008)
- Gillings BR, "Magnetic retention for complete and partial overdentures. Part I", J Prosthet Dent, 45, pp.484~491 (1981)
- Riley MA, "Magnets in prosthetic dentistry", J Prosthet Dent, 86, pp.137~142 (2001)
- Jonkman RE, "Satisfaction with complete immediate dentures and complete immediate overdentures", J Oral Rehabil, 22, pp.791~796 (1995)
- Gillings BR, "Magnetic denture retention systems: inexpensive and efficient", Int Dent J, 34, pp.184~197 (1984)
- Prieskel HW, "Precision attachments in prosthodontics", pp.191~241 (1986), USA Quintessence book
- Lewandowski JA, "An investigation of two rare earth magnetic systems by measuring grip force and reseating force", J Prosthet Dent, 60, pp.705~711 (1988)
- Akaltan F, "Retentive characteristics of different dental magnetic systems", J Prosthet Dent, 74, pp.422~427 (1995)
- Sarnat AE, "The efficiency of cobalt samarium (Co5Sm) magnets as retention units for overdentures", J Dent, 11, pp.324~333 (1983)
- 마평수, "마그네틱 형태와 고정체의 수에 따른 하악 임프란트 지지 overdenture의 삼차원 유한요소법적 연구", 석사, 고급치과보철학, pp.2005
- Thompson IM, "Magnetism as an aid to a prosthetic problem", Br J Oral Surg, 2, pp.44~46 (1964)
- Gillings BR, "Magnetic retention for dentures", Dent Outlook, 9, pp.1~9 (1983)
- 임한울, "피개의치용 자성 어태치먼트의 자력 변화에 관한 연구", 석사, 치의학과 치과보철학전공, pp.2014