Displacement of scan body during screw tightening: A comparative in vitro study
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of displacement while tightening the screw of scan bodies, which were compared according to the material type. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three types of scan bodies whose base regions were made up of polyether ether ketone (PEEK) material [Straumann Group, Dentium Group, and Myfit (PEEK) Group] and another scan body whose base region was made up of titanium material [Myfit (Metal) Group] were used (15 per group). The reference model was fabricated by aligning the scan body library on the central axis of the implant, and moving this position by the resin model. The screws of the scan bodies were tightened to the implant fixture with torques of 5 Ncm, 10 Ncm, and a hand tightening torque. After the application of the torque, the scan bodies were scanned using a laboratory scanner. To evaluate the vertical, horizontal, and 3-dimensional (3D) displacements, a 3D inspection software program was used. To examine the difference among groups, one-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s HSD post hoc test were used (α=.05). RESULTS. There were significant differences in 3D, vertical, and horizontal displacements among the different types of scan bodies (P<.001). There was a significantly lower displacement in the Straumann group than in the Myfit (PEEK) and Dentium groups (P<.05). CONCLUSION. The horizontal displacement in all groups was less than 10 탆. With the hand tightening torque, a high vertical displacement of over 100 탆 occurred in PEEK scan bodies (Myfit and Dentium). Therefore, it is recommended to apply a tightening torque of 5 Ncm instead of a hand tightening torque.
Abstract
PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of displacement while tightening the screw of scan bodies, which were compared according to the material type. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three types of scan bodies whose base regions were made up of polyether ether ketone (PEEK) material [Straumann Group, Dentium Group, and Myfit (PEEK) Group] and another scan body whose base region was made up of titanium material [Myfit (Metal) Group] were used (15 per group). The reference model was fabricated by aligning the scan body library on the central axis of the implant, and moving this position by the resin model. The screws of the scan bodies were tightened to the implant fixture with torques of 5 Ncm, 10 Ncm, and a hand tightening torque. After the application of the torque, the scan bodies were scanned using a laboratory scanner. To evaluate the vertical, horizontal, and 3-dimensional (3D) displacements, a 3D inspection software program was used. To examine the difference among groups, one-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s HSD post hoc test were used (α=.05). RESULTS. There were significant differences in 3D, vertical, and horizontal displacements among the different types of scan bodies (P<.001). There was a significantly lower displacement in the Straumann group than in the Myfit (PEEK) and Dentium groups (P<.05). CONCLUSION. The horizontal displacement in all groups was less than 10 탆. With the hand tightening torque, a high vertical displacement of over 100 탆 occurred in PEEK scan bodies (Myfit and Dentium). Therefore, it is recommended to apply a tightening torque of 5 Ncm instead of a hand tightening torque.
참고문헌 (27)
- Flügge T, "The accuracy of different dental impression techniques for implant-supported dental prostheses : A systematic review and meta-analysis", Clin Oral Implants Res, 29, pp.374~392 (2018)
- Goodacre CJ, "Clinical complications in fixed prosthodontics", J Prosthet Dent, 90, pp.31~41 (2003)
- Eckert SE, "Analysis of incidence and associated factors with fractured implants : a retrospective study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 15, pp.662~667 (2000)
- Eliasson A, "The precision of fit of milled titanium implant frameworks(I-Bridge)in the edentulous jaw", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 12, pp.81~90 (2010)
- Abduo J, "Assessing the fit of implant fixed prostheses : a critical review", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 25, pp.506~515 (2010)
- Mizumoto RM, "Intraoral scan bodies in implant dentistry : A systematic review", J Prosthet Dent, 120, pp.343~352 (2018)
- Lee SJ, "Accuracy of digital versus conventional implant impressions", Clin Oral Implants Res, 26, pp.715~719 (2015)
- Brandt J, "Digital process for an implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis : A clinical report", J Prosthet Dent, 114, pp.469~473 (2015)
- Albdour EA, "A novel in vivo method to evaluate trueness of digital impressions", BMC Oral Health, 18, pp.117~ (2018)
- Rutkunas V, "Clinical and laboratory passive fit assessment of implant-supported zirconia restorations fabricated using conventional and digital workflow", Clin Oral Impl Res, 22, pp.237~245 (2020)
- Moreira AH, "Accuracy comparison of implant impression techniques : A systematic review", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 17, pp.e751~e764 (2015)
- Schmidt A, "Influence of the accuracy of intraoral scanbodies on implant position : Differences in manufacturing tolerances", Int J Prosthodont, 32, pp.430~432 (2019)
- 김성준, "Digital evaluation of axial displacement by implant-abutment connection type: an in vitro study", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 10(5), pp.388~394 (2018), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Ichikawa T, "Use of a polyetheretherketone clasp retainer for removable partial denture : A case report", Dent J, 7, pp.4~ (2019)
- Zoidis P, "The use of a modified poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) as an alternative framework material for removable dental prostheses. A clinical report", J Prosthodont, 25, pp.580~584 (2016)
- Alikhasi M, "Clinician-generated torque on abutment screws using different hand screwdrivers", J Prosthet Dent, 118, pp.488~492 (2017)
- Brånemark PI, "Osseointegration and its experimental background", J Prosthet Dent, 50, pp.399~410 (1983)
- Jemt T, "Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Brånemark implants in edentulous jaws : a study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 6, pp.270~276 (1991)
- Karl M, "In vitro study on passive fit in implant-supported 5-unit fixed partial dentures", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 19, pp.30~37 (2004)
- Kunavisarut C, "Finite element analysis on dental implant-supported prostheses without passive fit", J Prosthodont, 11, pp.30~40 (2002)
- Gilbert AB, "Three-dimensional displacement of nine different abutments for an implant with an internal hexagon platform", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 30, pp.781~788 (2015)
- Rebeeah HA, "Comparison of 3D displacements of screw-retained zirconia implant crowns into implants with different internal connections with respect to screw tightening", J Prosthet Dent, 119, pp.132~137 (2018)
- Mangano F, "Intraoral scanners in dentistry : a review of the current literature", BMC Oral Health, 17, pp.149~ (2017)
- Park GH, "Feasibility of using an intraoral scanner for a complete-arch digital scan", J Prosthet Dent, 121, pp.803~810 (2019)
- Ender A, "In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions", J Prosthet Dent, 115, pp.313~320 (2016)
- Fukazawa S, "Investigation of accuracy and reproducibility of abutment position by intraoral scanners", J Prosthodont Res, 61, pp.450~459 (2017)
- Mangano FG, "Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners in the impressions of single and multiple implants : a comparative in vitro study", BMC Oral Health, 19, pp.101~ (2019)