본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Biomechanical behavior of CAD/CAM cobalt-chromium and zirconia full-arch fixed prostheses

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

PURPOSE. To verify the influence of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) implantsupported prostheses manufactured with cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) and zirconia (Zr), and whether ceramic application, spark erosion, and simulation of masticatory cycles modify biomechanical parameters (marginal fit, screw-loosening torque, and strain) on the implant-supported system. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Ten full-arch fixed frameworks were manufactured by a CAD/CAM milling system with Co-Cr and Zr (n=5/group). The marginal fit between the abutment and frameworks was measured as stated by single-screw test. Screw-loosening torque evaluated screw stability, and strain analysis was explored on the implant-supported system. All analyses were performed at 3 distinct times: after framework manufacturing; after ceramic application in both materials’ frameworks; and after the spark erosion in Co-Cr frameworks. Afterward, stability analysis was re-evaluated after 106 mechanical cycles (2 Hz/150-N) for both materials. Statistical analyses were performed by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests (α=.05). RESULTS. No difference between the two materials was found for marginal fit, screwloosening torque, and strain after framework manufacturing (P>.05). Ceramic application did not affect the variables (P>.05). Spark erosion optimized marginal fit and strain medians for Co-Cr frameworks (P<.05). Screwloosening torque was significantly reduced by masticatory simulation (P<.05) regardless of the framework materials. CONCLUSION. Co-Cr and Zr frameworks presented similar biomechanical behavior. Ceramic application had no effect on the biomechanical behavior of either material. Spark erosion was an effective technique to improve Co-Cr biomechanical behavior on the implant-supported system. Screw-loosening torque was reduced for both materials after masticatory simulation.

Abstract

PURPOSE. To verify the influence of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) implantsupported prostheses manufactured with cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) and zirconia (Zr), and whether ceramic application, spark erosion, and simulation of masticatory cycles modify biomechanical parameters (marginal fit, screw-loosening torque, and strain) on the implant-supported system. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Ten full-arch fixed frameworks were manufactured by a CAD/CAM milling system with Co-Cr and Zr (n=5/group). The marginal fit between the abutment and frameworks was measured as stated by single-screw test. Screw-loosening torque evaluated screw stability, and strain analysis was explored on the implant-supported system. All analyses were performed at 3 distinct times: after framework manufacturing; after ceramic application in both materials’ frameworks; and after the spark erosion in Co-Cr frameworks. Afterward, stability analysis was re-evaluated after 106 mechanical cycles (2 Hz/150-N) for both materials. Statistical analyses were performed by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests (α=.05). RESULTS. No difference between the two materials was found for marginal fit, screwloosening torque, and strain after framework manufacturing (P>.05). Ceramic application did not affect the variables (P>.05). Spark erosion optimized marginal fit and strain medians for Co-Cr frameworks (P<.05). Screwloosening torque was significantly reduced by masticatory simulation (P<.05) regardless of the framework materials. CONCLUSION. Co-Cr and Zr frameworks presented similar biomechanical behavior. Ceramic application had no effect on the biomechanical behavior of either material. Spark erosion was an effective technique to improve Co-Cr biomechanical behavior on the implant-supported system. Screw-loosening torque was reduced for both materials after masticatory simulation.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. Papaspyridakos P, "Double full-arch fixed implant-supported prostheses : Outcomes and complications after a mean follow-up of 5 years", J Prosthodont, 28, pp.387~397 (2019)
  2. Rojas Vizcaya F, "Retrospective 2-to 7-year follow-up study of 20 double full-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed prostheses : measurements and recommendations for optimal design", J Prosthodont, 27, pp.501~508 (2018)
  3. Jokstad A, "New 3D technologies applied to assess the long-term clinical effects of misfit of the full jaw fixed prosthesis on dental implants", Clin Oral Implants Res, 26, pp.1129~1134 (2015)
  4. de Torres EM, "The effect of commercially pure titanium and alternative dental alloys on the marginal fit of one-piece cast implant frameworks", J Dent, 35, pp.800~805 (2007)
  5. Ciocca L, "Manufacturing of metal frameworks for full-arch dental restoration on implants : A comparison between milling and a novel hybrid technology", J Prosthodont, 28, pp.556~563 (2019)
  6. Abduo J, "Effect of vertical misfit on strain within screw-retained implant titanium and zirconia frameworks", J Prosthodont Res, 56, pp.102~109 (2012)
  7. Burguete RL, "Tightening characteristics for screwed joints in osseointegrated dental implants", J Prosthet Dent, 71, pp.592~599 (1994)
  8. Presotto AGC, "Influence of spark erosion on the fit of screw-retained Co-Cr fixed complete denture frameworks veneered with different materials", J Prosthet Dent, 119, pp.797~803 (2018)
  9. Abduo J, "Fit of CAD", CAM implant frameworks : a comprehensive review, 2014, pp.40, 758~766
  10. Abduo J, "A comparison of fit of CNC-milled titanium and zirconia frameworks to implants", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 14, pp.e20~e29 (2012)
  11. de França DG, "Precision fit of screw-retained implant-supported fixed dental prostheses fabricated by CAD", CAM, copymilling, and conventional methods, 2017, pp.32, 507~513
  12. de França DG, "Influence of CAD", CAM on the fit accuracy of implant-supported zirconia and cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses, 2015, pp.113, 22~28
  13. Beuer F, "Digital dentistry : an overview of recent developments for CAD", CAM generated restorations, 2008, pp.204, 505~511
  14. Drago C, "Concepts for designing and fabricating metal implant frameworks for hybrid implant prostheses", J Prosthodont, 21, pp.413~424 (2012)
  15. Bhering CL, "The effect of casting and masticatory simulation on strain and misfit of implant-supported metal frameworks", Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 62, pp.746~751 (2016)
  16. Pieralli S, "Clinical outcomes of partial and full-arch all-ceramic implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. A systematic review and meta-analysis", Clin Oral Implants Res, 29, pp.224~236 (2018)
  17. Kunii J, "Effect of sintering on the marginal and internal fit of CAD", CAM-fabricated zirconia frameworks, 2007, pp.26, 820~826
  18. Abduo J, "Influence of vertical misfit of titanium and zirconia frameworks on peri-implant strain", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 27, pp.529~536 (2012)
  19. Faucher RR, "Distortion related to margin design in porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations", J Prosthet Dent, 43, pp.149~155 (1980)
  20. Nakaoka MM, "Misfit of pure titanium frameworks : effect of veneer coverage and spark erosion process", Acta Odontol Scand, 69, pp.238~242 (2011)
  21. Silva TB, "Influence of laser-welding and electroerosion on passive fit of implant-supported prosthesis", Stomatologija, 10, pp.96~100 (2008)
  22. Jemt T, "Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Brånemark implants in edentulous jaws : a study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 6, pp.270~276 (1991)
  23. Farina AP, "Screw joint stability after the application of retorque in implant-supported dentures under simulated masticatory conditions", J Prosthet Dent, 111, pp.499~504 (2014)
  24. Bickford JH, "An Introduction to the designs and behavior of bolted joints", pp.515~564 (1995), Marcel Dekker
  25. Gomes ÉA, "Torque loss under mechanical cycling of long-span zirconia and titanium-cemented and screw-retained implant-supported CAD", CAM frameworks, 2014, pp.25, 1395~1402
  26. Bhering CL, "Comparison between all-on-four and all-on-six treatment concepts and framework material on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla : A prototyping guided 3D-FEA study", Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 69, pp.715~725 (2016)
  27. Presotto AG, "Marginal fit and photoelastic stress analysis of CAD-CAM and overcast 3-unit implant-supported frameworks", J Prosthet Dent, 117, pp.373~379 (2017)
  28. Presotto AGC, "Dimensional precision of implant-supported frameworks fabricated by 3D printing", J Prosthet Dent, 122, pp.38~45 (2019)
  29. Wiskott HW, "Stress fatigue : basic principles and prosthodontic implications", Int J Prosthodont, 8, pp.105~116 (1995)
  30. "ISO 14801. Dentistry - Implants - Dynamic loading test for endosseous dental implants" (2016)[URL]
  31. Braian M, "Geometrical accuracy of metallic objects produced with additive or subtractive manufacturing : A comparative in vitro study", Dent Mater, 34, pp.978~993 (2018)
  32. Abduo J, "Trends in computer-aided manufacturing in prosthodontics : a review of the available streams", Int J Dent, 2014, pp.783948~ (2014)
  33. Frost HM, "A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff ’s Law for clinicians", Angle Orthod, 74, pp.3~15 (2004)
  34. Papanagiotou HP, "In vitro evaluation of low-temperature aging effects and finishing procedures on the flexural strength and structural stability of Y-TZP dental ceramics", J Prosthet Dent, 96, pp.154~164 (2006)
  35. Svanborg P, "Fit of 3Y-TZP complete-arch implant-supported fixed dental prostheses before and after porcelain veneering", J Prosthet Dent, 122, pp.137~141 (2019)
  36. Skalak R, "Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses", J Prosthet Dent, 49, pp.843~848 (1983)
  37. Breeding LC, "Torque required to loosen single-tooth implant abutment screws before and after simulated function", Int J Prosthodont, 6, pp.435~439 (1993)
  38. Worni A, "Zirconia-based screw-retained prostheses supported by implants : A retrospective study on technical complications and failures", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 17, pp.1073~1081 (2015)

관련 논문AI추천

Biomechanical investigation of maxillary implant-supported full-arch prostheses produced with different framework materials: a finite elements studyEmre Mumcu, Mirac Berke Topcu Ersöz대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2022 · 제14권 제6호Influence of misfit direction and abutment type on torque loss and fracture strength of implant-supported fixed dental prosthesesDaniel Kules, Ieva Gendviliene, Ingrida Mischitz, Liudas Auškalnis, Maisa Haiek, Mutlu Özcan, Tan Fırat Eyüboğlu, Vygandas Rutkūnas대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2025 · 제17권 제6호Role of span length in the adaptation of implant-supported cobalt chromium frameworks fabricated by three techniquesHuang Yiqing, Li Yong, Ma Xiao, Wang Jiawei, Zhou Ying대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2017 · 제9권 제2호Fit analysis of implant-supported Co-Cr bars fabricated using casting, selective laser sintering, soft and dense milling techniquesElif Yiğit, Volkan Şahin대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2025 · 제17권 제4호Comparative study on stress distribution around internal tapered connection implants according to fit of cement-and screw-retained prostheses박은진, 박지만, 이미영, 허성주대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2013 · 제5권 제3호The effect of the digital manufacturing technique of cantilevered implant-supported frameworks on abutment screw preloadHanan Nejer Alotaibi, Shahad Mohammmed Altuwaijri, Talal Mughaileth Alnassar대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2022 · 제14권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)