A two-short-implant-supported molar restoration in atrophic posterior maxilla: A finite element analysis
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to investigate the stress distribution of 2-short implants (2SIs) installed in a severely atrophic maxillary molar site. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three different diameters of internal connection implants were modeled: narrow platform (NP), regular platform (RP), and wide platform (WP). The maxillary first molars were restored with one implant or two short implants. Three 2SI models (NP-oblique, NP-vertical, and NP-horizontal) and four single implant models (RP and WP in a centered or cantilevered position) were used. Axial and oblique loadings were applied on the occlusal surface of the crown. The von Mises stress values were measured at the bone-implant, peri-implant bone, and implant/abutment complex. RESULTS. The highest stress distribution at the bone-implant interface and the peri-implant bone was noticed in the RP group, and the lowest stress distribution was observed in the 2SI groups. Cantilevered position showed unfavorable stress distribution with axial loading. 2SI types did not affect the stress distribution in oblique loading. The number and installation positions of the implant, rather than the bone level, influenced the stress distribution of 2SIs. The implant/abutment complex of WP presented the highest stress concentration while that of 2SIs showed the lowest stress concentration. CONCLUSION. 2SIs may be useful for achieving stable stress distribution on the surrounding bone and implant-abutment complex in the atrophic posterior maxilla.
Abstract
PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to investigate the stress distribution of 2-short implants (2SIs) installed in a severely atrophic maxillary molar site. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three different diameters of internal connection implants were modeled: narrow platform (NP), regular platform (RP), and wide platform (WP). The maxillary first molars were restored with one implant or two short implants. Three 2SI models (NP-oblique, NP-vertical, and NP-horizontal) and four single implant models (RP and WP in a centered or cantilevered position) were used. Axial and oblique loadings were applied on the occlusal surface of the crown. The von Mises stress values were measured at the bone-implant, peri-implant bone, and implant/abutment complex. RESULTS. The highest stress distribution at the bone-implant interface and the peri-implant bone was noticed in the RP group, and the lowest stress distribution was observed in the 2SI groups. Cantilevered position showed unfavorable stress distribution with axial loading. 2SI types did not affect the stress distribution in oblique loading. The number and installation positions of the implant, rather than the bone level, influenced the stress distribution of 2SIs. The implant/abutment complex of WP presented the highest stress concentration while that of 2SIs showed the lowest stress concentration. CONCLUSION. 2SIs may be useful for achieving stable stress distribution on the surrounding bone and implant-abutment complex in the atrophic posterior maxilla.
참고문헌 (29)
- Buser D, "Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants", Clin Oral Implants Res, 8, pp.161~172 (1997)
- Schwartz-Arad D, "Failure causes, timing, and cluster behavior: an 8-year study of dental implants", Implant Dent, 17, pp.200~207 (2008)
- 김성회, "임플란트의 생존율에 영향을 미치는 국소적 인자에 대한 19년간의 후향적 연구", 대한치과보철학회지, 48(01), pp.28~40 (2010), 대한치과보철학회
- Anderson DJ, "Measurement of stress in mastication", I. J Dent Res, 35, pp.664~670 (1956)
- Sakaguchi R, "Craig’s restorative dental material", pp.60~ (2011), Mosby
- Jensen OT, "Report of the Sinus Consensus Conference of 1996", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 13, pp.11~45 (1998)
- Wallace SS, "Sinus augmentation utilizing anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss) with absorbable and nonabsorbable membranes placed over the lateral window: histomorphometric and clinical analyses", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 25, pp.551~559 (2005)
- Rosen PS, "The bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation technique: multicenter retrospective report of consecutively treated patients", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 14, pp.853~858 (1999)
- Akça K, "A comparison of threedimensional finite element stress analysis with in vitro strain gauge measurements on dental implants", Int J Prosthodont, 15, pp.115~121 (2002)
- 유화숙, "상악동 골 이식술을 동반하여 식립된 임플란트의 변연골변화와 생존률에 관한 후향적 연구", 대한치과보철학회지, 47(2), pp.240~246 (2009), 대한치과보철학회
- Lazzara RJ, "The sinus elevation procedure in endosseous implant therapy", Curr Opin Periodontol, 3, pp.178~183 (1996)
- Winter AA, "Placement of implants in the severely atrophic posterior maxilla using localized management of the sinus floor: a preliminary study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 17, pp.687~695 (2002)
- Friberg B, "Longterm follow-up of severely atrophic edentulous mandibles reconstructed with short Brånemark implants", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2, pp.184~189 (2000)
- das Neves FD, "Short implants-an analysis of longitudinal studies", J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 21, pp.86~93 (2006)
- Tawil G, "Clinical evaluation of short, machinedsurface implants followed for 12 to 92 months", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 18, pp.894~901 (2003)
- Fugazzotto PA, "Shorter implants in clinical practice: rationale and treatment results", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 23, pp.487~496 (2008)
- Thor A, "Bone formation at the maxillary sinus floor following simultaneous elevation of the mucosal lining and implant installation without graft material: an evaluation of 20 patients treated with 44Astra Tech implants", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 65, pp.64~72 (2007)
- Bahat O, "Treatment planning and placement of implants in the posterior maxillae: report of 732 consecutive Nobelpharma implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 8, pp.151~161 (1993)
- Pierrisnard L, "Influence of implant length and bicortical anchorage on implant stress distribution", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 5, pp.254~262 (2003)
- Lum LB, "A biomechanical rationale for the use of short implants", J Oral Implantol, 17, pp.126~131 (1991)
- Sato Y, "Biomechanical effects of double or wide implants for single molar replacement in the posterior mandibular region", J Oral Rehabil, 27, pp.842~845 (2000)
- Griffin TJ, "The use of short, wide implants in posterior areas with reduced bone height: a retrospective investigation", J Prosthet Dent, 92, pp.139~144 (2004)
- Balshi TJ, "Two-implant-supported single molar replacement: interdental space requirements and comparison to alternative options", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 17, pp.426~435 (1997)
- 송호용, "위축된 상악구치부에서 두 개의 짧은 임플란트지지형 단일치관의 임상연구", 대한치과의사협회지, 53(9), pp.628~643 (2015), 대한치과의사협회
- Collings E, "The physical metallurgy of titanium alloys" (1984), American Society for Metals
- Pessoa RS, "Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching in different implant protocols: computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 25, pp.911~919 (2010)
- Rangert B, "Forces and moments on Branemark implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 4, pp.241~247 (1989)
- Cağlar A, "Effects of mesiodistal inclination of implants on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prostheses", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 21, pp.36~44 (2006)
- Cha HS, "Cumulative survival rate and complication rates of single-tooth implant; focused on the coronal fracture of fixture in the internal connection implant", J Oral Rehabil, 40, pp.595~602 (2013)