The effect of denture base surface pretreatments on bond strengths of two long term resilient liners
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. Purpose of this study was to evaluate effect of two surface treatments, sandblasting and monomer treatment, on tensile bond strength between two long term resilient liners and poly (methyl methacrylate) denture base resin. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Two resilient liners Super-Soft and Molloplast-B were selected.Sixty acrylic resin (Trevalon) specimens with cross sectional area of 10×10 mm were prepared and divided into two groups of 30 specimens each. Each group was surface treated (n = 10) by sandblasting (250 μalumina particles), monomer treatment (for 180 sec) and control (no surface treatment). Resilient liners were processed between 2 poly(methyl methacrylate) surfaces, in the dimensions of 10×10×3 mm. Tensile strength was determined with Instron Universal testing machine, at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min; and the modes of failure (adhesive, cohesive or mixed) were recorded. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey HSD test (α= 0.05). RESULTS. Monomer pretreatment of acrylic resin produced significantly higher bond strengths when compared to sandblasting and control for both resilient liners (P < .001). Sandblasting significantly decreased the bond strength for both the liners when compared to monomer pretreatment and control (P < .001). Mean bond strength of Super-Soft lined specimens was significantly higher than Molloplast-B in various surface treatment groups (P < .05). CONCLUSION. Surface pretreatment of the acrylic resin with monomer prior to resilient liner application is an effective method to increase bond strength between the base and soft liner. Sandblasting, on the contrary, is not recommended as it weakens the bond between the two.
Abstract
PURPOSE. Purpose of this study was to evaluate effect of two surface treatments, sandblasting and monomer treatment, on tensile bond strength between two long term resilient liners and poly (methyl methacrylate) denture base resin. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Two resilient liners Super-Soft and Molloplast-B were selected.Sixty acrylic resin (Trevalon) specimens with cross sectional area of 10×10 mm were prepared and divided into two groups of 30 specimens each. Each group was surface treated (n = 10) by sandblasting (250 μalumina particles), monomer treatment (for 180 sec) and control (no surface treatment). Resilient liners were processed between 2 poly(methyl methacrylate) surfaces, in the dimensions of 10×10×3 mm. Tensile strength was determined with Instron Universal testing machine, at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min; and the modes of failure (adhesive, cohesive or mixed) were recorded. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey HSD test (α= 0.05). RESULTS. Monomer pretreatment of acrylic resin produced significantly higher bond strengths when compared to sandblasting and control for both resilient liners (P < .001). Sandblasting significantly decreased the bond strength for both the liners when compared to monomer pretreatment and control (P < .001). Mean bond strength of Super-Soft lined specimens was significantly higher than Molloplast-B in various surface treatment groups (P < .05). CONCLUSION. Surface pretreatment of the acrylic resin with monomer prior to resilient liner application is an effective method to increase bond strength between the base and soft liner. Sandblasting, on the contrary, is not recommended as it weakens the bond between the two.
참고문헌 (19)
- Anusavice KJ, "Phillips' science of dental materials. 11th ed", pp.750~751 (2003), Elsevier
- Sarac D, "The evaluation of microleakage and bond strength of a silicone-based resilient liner following denture base surface pretreatment", J Prosthet Dent, 95, pp.143~151 (2006)
- Emmer TJ Jr, "Bond strength of permanent soft denture liners bonded to the denture base", J Prosthet Dent, 74, pp.595~601 (1995)
- El-Hadary A, "Comparative study of water sorption, solubility, and tensile bond strength of two soft lining materials", J Prosthet Dent, 83, pp.356~361 (2000)
- Jacobsen NL, "Lased and sandblasted denture base surface preparations affecting resilient liner bonding", J Prosthet Dent, 78, pp.153~158 (1997)
- Saraç YS, "Effect of denture base surface pretreatment on microleakage of a siliconebased resilient liner", J Prosthet Dent, 92, pp.283~287 (2004)
- al-Athel MS, "Effect of test method on the bond strength of a silicone resilient denture lining material", J Prosthet Dent, 76, pp.535~540 (1996)
- Kawano F, "Comparison of bond strength of six soft denture liners to denture base resin", J Prosthet Dent, 68, pp.368~371 (1992)
- Bates JF, "Evaluation of indirect resilient liners for dentures: Laboratory and clinical tests", J Am Dent Assoc, 70, pp.344~353 (1965)
- Kulak-Ozkan Y, "Effect of thermocycling on tensile bond strength of six silicone-based, resilient denture liners", J Prosthet Dent, 89, pp.303~310 (2003)
- Craig RG, "Properties of resilient denture liners", J Am Dent Assoc, 63, pp.382~390 (1961)
- Amin WM, "The nature of the interface between polymethyl methacrylate denture base materials and soft lining materials", J Dent, 9, pp.336~346 (1981)
- Brown D, "Resilient soft liners and tissue conditioners", Br Dent J, 164, pp.357~360 (1988)
- Kawano F, "Bond strength of six soft denture liners processed against polymerized and unpolymerized poly(methyl methacrylate)", Int J Prosthodont, 10, pp.178~182 (1997)
- Al-Athel MS, "Bone strength of resilient lining materials to various denture base resins", Int J Prosthodont, 9, pp.167~170 (1996)
- Kutay O, "Comparison of tensile and peel bond strengths of resilient liners", J Prosthet Dent, 71, pp.525~531 (1994)
- Khan Z, "Adhesion characteristics of visible light-cured denture base material bonded to resilient lining materials", J Prosthet Dent, 62, pp.196~200 (1989)
- Dootz ER, "Physical property comparison of 11 soft denture lining materials as a function of accelerated aging", J Prosthet Dent, 69, pp.114~119 (1993)
- Vallittu PK, "Wetting the repair surface with methyl methacrylate affects the transverse strength of repaired heat-polymerized resin", J Prosthet Dent, 72, pp.639~643 (1994)