Wear, microleakage and plastic deformation of an implantsupported chair-side bar system
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. This in-vitro study was designed to evaluate retention forces, microleakage and plastic deformation of a prefabricated 2-implant bar attachment system (SFI-Bar, Cendres+Métaux, Switzerland). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Two SFI implant-adapters were torqued with 35 Ncm into two implant analogues. Before the tube bars were finally sealed, the inner cavity of the tube bar was filled with liquid red dye to evaluate microleakage. As tube bar sealing agents three different materials were used (AGC Cem (AGC, resin based), Cervitec Plus (CP; varnish) and Gapseal (GS; silicone based). Four groups with eight specimens each were tested (GS, GS+AGC, AGC, CP). For cyclic loading, the attachment system was assembled parallel to the female counterparts in a chewing simulator. The mean retention forces of the initial and final ten cycles were statistically evaluated (ANOVA, α≤.05). RESULTS. All groups showed a significant loss of retention forces. Their means differed between 30-39 N initially and 22-28 N after 50,000 loading cycles. No significant statistical differences could be found between the groups at the beginning (P=.224), at the end (P=.257) or between the loss of retention forces (P=.288). Microleakage occurred initially only in some groups but after 10,000 loading cycles all groupsexhibited microleakage. CONCLUSION. Long-term retention forces of the SFI-Bar remained above 20 N which can be considered clinically sufficient. The sealing agents in this study are not suitable to prevent microleakage.
Abstract
PURPOSE. This in-vitro study was designed to evaluate retention forces, microleakage and plastic deformation of a prefabricated 2-implant bar attachment system (SFI-Bar, Cendres+Métaux, Switzerland). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Two SFI implant-adapters were torqued with 35 Ncm into two implant analogues. Before the tube bars were finally sealed, the inner cavity of the tube bar was filled with liquid red dye to evaluate microleakage. As tube bar sealing agents three different materials were used (AGC Cem (AGC, resin based), Cervitec Plus (CP; varnish) and Gapseal (GS; silicone based). Four groups with eight specimens each were tested (GS, GS+AGC, AGC, CP). For cyclic loading, the attachment system was assembled parallel to the female counterparts in a chewing simulator. The mean retention forces of the initial and final ten cycles were statistically evaluated (ANOVA, α≤.05). RESULTS. All groups showed a significant loss of retention forces. Their means differed between 30-39 N initially and 22-28 N after 50,000 loading cycles. No significant statistical differences could be found between the groups at the beginning (P=.224), at the end (P=.257) or between the loss of retention forces (P=.288). Microleakage occurred initially only in some groups but after 10,000 loading cycles all groupsexhibited microleakage. CONCLUSION. Long-term retention forces of the SFI-Bar remained above 20 N which can be considered clinically sufficient. The sealing agents in this study are not suitable to prevent microleakage.
참고문헌 (22)
- Thompson GW, "The impact of the demographics of aging and the edentulous condition on dental care services", J Prosthet Dent, 79, pp.56~59 (1998)
- van Waas MA, "Treatment results with immediate overdentures: an evaluation of 4.5years", J Prosthet Dent, 76, pp.153~157 (1996)
- Bergendal T, "Implant-supported overdentures: a longitudinal prospective study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 13, pp.253~262 (1998)
- Timmerman R, "An eight-year follow-up to a randomized clinical trial of participant satisfaction with three types of mandibular implant-retained overdentures", J Dent Res, 83, pp.630~633 (2004)
- MacEntee MI, "A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results", J Prosthet Dent, 93, pp.28~37 (2005)
- Zou D, "A 3-year prospective clinical study of telescopic crown, bar, and locator attachments for removable four implant-supported maxillary overdentures", Int J Prosthodont, 26, pp.566~573 (2013)
- Albrecht D, "Space requirement of a prefabricated bar on two interforaminal implants: a prospective clinical study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 26, pp.143~148 (2015)
- Petropoulos VC, "Comparison of retention and release periods for implant overdenture attachments", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 12, pp.176~185 (1997)
- Leung T, "Retention profiles of stud-type precision attachments", Int J Prosthodont, 4, pp.175~179 (1991)
- Dudic A, "Retention mechanisms and prosthetic complications of implant-supported mandibular overdentures:long-term results", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 4, pp.212~219 (2002)
- Naert I, "Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures:a 10-year randomized clinical study", Int J Prosthodont, 17, pp.401~410 (2004)
- Naert I, "A 10-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining mandibular overdentures:peri-implant outcome", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 19, pp.695~702 (2004)
- Ender A, "Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions:a new method of measuring trueness and precision", J Prosthet Dent, 109, pp.121~128 (2013)
- Wee AG, "Strategies to achieve fit in implant prosthodontics: a review of the literature", Int J Prosthodont, 12, pp.167~178 (1999)
- Deslis A, "Numerical investigations of the loading behaviour of a prefabricated non-rigid bar system", Ann Anat, 194, pp.538~544 (2012)
- Kobayashi M, "Effects of in vitro cyclic dislodging on retentive force and removal torque of three overdenture attachment systems", Clin Oral Implants Res, 25, pp.426~434 (2014)
- 하승룡, "Implant-supported overdenture with prefabricated bar attachment system in edentulous mandibular patient", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 4(4), pp.254~258 (2012), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- 김하영, "Immediate loading on mandibular edentulous patient with SFI Bar� overdenture", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 3(1), pp.47~50 (2011), 대한치과보철학회
- Bayer S, "Investigation of the wear of prefabricated attachments--an in vitro study of retention forces and fitting tolerances", Quintessence Int, 38, pp.e229~e237 (2007)
- Wolf K, "Analysis of retention and wear of ball attachments", Quintessence Int, 40, pp.405~412 (2009)
- Harder S, "Molecular leakage at implant-abutment connectionin vitro investigation of tightness of internal conical implantabutment connections against endotoxin penetration", Clin Oral Investig, 14, pp.427~432 (2010)
- Fritzemeier C, "Prophylaxis of periimplantitis by sealing of the implant interiors with GapSeal®", Implantol, 15, pp.71~79 (2007)