The effect of sandblasting duration on the bond durability of dual-cure adhesive cement to CAD/CAM resin restoratives
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. To evaluate the effect of prolonged sandblasting on the bond durability of dual-cure adhesive resin cement to computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) restoratives. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Nano-ceramic LAVA Ultimate and hybrid-ceramic VITA Enamic CAD/CAM blocks were used for this study. Each CAD/CAM block was sectioned into slabs of 4-mm thickness for the microtensile test (μTBS) test and 2-mm thickness for the surface roughness test. Three groups were created according to the sandblasting protocols; group 1: specimens were sandblasted for 15 seconds, group 2: specimens were sandblasted for 30 seconds, and group 3: specimens were sandblasted for 60 seconds. After sandblasting, all specimens were luted using RelyX Ultimate Clicker. Half the specimens were subjected to μTBS tests at 24 hours, and the other half were subjected to tests after 5000 thermocycles. Additionally, a total of 96 CAD/CAM block sections were prepared for surface roughness tests and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) evaluations. The Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance, and Dunn’s post hoc test were used to compare continuous variables among the groups. RESULTS. At baseline, group 1, group 2, and group 3 exhibited statistically similar μTBS results for LAVA. However, group 3 had significantly lower μTBS values than groups 1 and 2 for VITA. After 5000 thermocycles, μTBS values significantly decreased for each block (P<.05). CONCLUSION. It is important to perform controlled sandblasting because it may affect bond strength results. Sixty seconds of sandblasting disturbs the initial μTBS values and the stability of adhesion of CAD/CAM restoratives to dual-cure adhesive resincement for VITA Enamic.
Abstract
PURPOSE. To evaluate the effect of prolonged sandblasting on the bond durability of dual-cure adhesive resin cement to computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) restoratives. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Nano-ceramic LAVA Ultimate and hybrid-ceramic VITA Enamic CAD/CAM blocks were used for this study. Each CAD/CAM block was sectioned into slabs of 4-mm thickness for the microtensile test (μTBS) test and 2-mm thickness for the surface roughness test. Three groups were created according to the sandblasting protocols; group 1: specimens were sandblasted for 15 seconds, group 2: specimens were sandblasted for 30 seconds, and group 3: specimens were sandblasted for 60 seconds. After sandblasting, all specimens were luted using RelyX Ultimate Clicker. Half the specimens were subjected to μTBS tests at 24 hours, and the other half were subjected to tests after 5000 thermocycles. Additionally, a total of 96 CAD/CAM block sections were prepared for surface roughness tests and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) evaluations. The Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance, and Dunn’s post hoc test were used to compare continuous variables among the groups. RESULTS. At baseline, group 1, group 2, and group 3 exhibited statistically similar μTBS results for LAVA. However, group 3 had significantly lower μTBS values than groups 1 and 2 for VITA. After 5000 thermocycles, μTBS values significantly decreased for each block (P<.05). CONCLUSION. It is important to perform controlled sandblasting because it may affect bond strength results. Sixty seconds of sandblasting disturbs the initial μTBS values and the stability of adhesion of CAD/CAM restoratives to dual-cure adhesive resincement for VITA Enamic.
참고문헌 (25)
- Ruse ND, "Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD", CAM applications, 2014, pp.93, 1232~1234
- Okada K, "A novel technique for preparing dental CAD", CAM composite resin blocks using the filler press and monomer infiltration method, 2014, pp.33, 203~209
- Ferracane JL, "Resin composite-state of the art", Dent Mater, 27, pp.29~38 (2011)[DOI]
- Spitznagel FA, "Resin bond to indirect composite and new ceramic", polymer materials: a review of the literature, 2014, pp.26, 382~393
- Kurbad A, "A new, hybrid material for minimally invasive restorations in clinical use", Int J Comput Dent, 16, pp.69~79 (2013)
- Koller M, "Lava ultimate resin nano ceramic for CAD", CAM: customization case study, 2012, pp.15, 159~164
- Peumans M, "Bonding effectiveness of luting composites to different CAD", CAM materials, 2016, pp.18, 289~302
- Rocca GT, "Bonded indirect restorations for posterior teeth: the luting appointment", Quintessence Int, 38, pp.543~553 (2007)
- Yoshihara K, "Sandblasting may damage the surface of composite CAD-CAM blocks", Dent Mater, 33, pp.e124~e135 (2017)[DOI]
- Ersu B, "Surface roughness and bond strengths of glass-infiltrated alumina-ceramics prepared using various surface treatments", J Dent, 37, pp.848~856 (2009)[DOI]
- Stawarczyk B, "Effect of surface conditioning with airborne-particle abrasion on the tensile strength of polymeric CAD", CAM crowns luted with self-adhesive and conventional resin cements, 2012, pp.107, 94~101
- Higashi M, "Bonding effectiveness of self-adhesive and conventional-type adhesive resin cements to CAD", CAM resin blocks. Part 1: Effects of sandblasting and silanization, 2016, pp.35, 21~28
- Kassotakis EM, "Evaluation of the effect of different surface treatments on luting CAD", CAM composite resin overlay workpieces, 2015, pp.17, 521~528
- Barutcigil K, "Effect of different surface treatments on bond strength of resin cement to a CAD", CAM restorative material, 2016, ~
- Elsaka SE, "Bond strength of novel CAD", CAM restorative materials to self-adhesive resin cement: the effect of surface treatments, 2014, pp.16, 531~540
- Gomes AL, "Influence of sandblasting granulometry and resin cement composition on microtensile bond strength to zirconia ceramic for dental prosthetic frameworks", J Dent, 41, pp.31~41 (2013)[DOI]
- Tekce N, "The effect of surface sealant application and accelerated aging on posterior restorative surfaces: An SEM and AFM study", Dent Mater J, 36, pp.182~189 (2017)[DOI]
- Silthampitag P, "Effect of surface pretreat- ments on resin composite bonding to PEEK", Dent Mater J, 35, pp.668~674 (2016)[DOI]
- Naichuan Su, "The effect of various sandblasting conditions on surface changes of dental zirconia and shear bond strength between zirconia core and indirect composite resin", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 7(3), pp.214~223 (2015), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Peumans M, "Effects of ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength of an adhesive luting agent to CAD-CAM ceramic", J Dent, 35, pp.282~288 (2007)[DOI]
- Osorio R, "Resistance to bond degradation between dualcure resin cements and pre-treated sintered CAD-CAM dental ceramics", Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 17, pp.669~677 (2012)
- Cekic-Nagas I, "Micro-shear bond strength of different resin cements to ceramic", glass-polymer CAD-CAM block materials, 2016, pp.60, 265~273
- Smith RL, "Long-term microtensile bond strength of surface modified zirconia", Dent Mater, 27, pp.779~785 (2011)[DOI]
- Oyague RC, "Effect of water aging on microtensile bond strength of dual-cured resin cements to pre-treated sintered zirconi- um-oxide ceramics", Dent Mater, 25, pp.392~399 (2009)[DOI]
- Pollington S, "Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to a novel fluorcanasite glass-ceramic following different surface treatments", Dent Mater, 26, pp.864~872 (2010)[DOI]