본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Cellular responses to 3D-printed dental resins produced using a manufacturer recommended printer versus a third party printer

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different 3D dental resins, using a manufacturer recommended printer and a third-party printer, on cellular responses of human gingival cells. Materials and Methods. Three NextDent resins (Denture 3D+, C&B MFH and Crowntec) were used to produce specimens on printers NextDent 5100 (groups ND, NC and NT, respectively) and Phrozen Sonic Mini 4K (groups PD, PC and PT, respectively). Human gingival fibroblasts were cultured and biocompatibility was evaluated on days 1, 3 and 7. IL-6 and IL-8 concentrations were evaluated at 3 days using ELISA. Surface roughness was evaluated by a contact profilometer. SEM and fluorescence micrographs were analyzed at days 1 and 7. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS and mean differences were tested using ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey tests (P < .05). Results. There was an increase in cellular viability after 7 days in groups PC and PT, when compared to group PD. ND group resulted in higher concentration of IL-6 when compared to PT group. SEM and fluorescence micrographs showed less adhesion and thinner morphology of fibroblasts from group PD. No significant differences were found regarding surface roughness. Conclusion. The use of different printers or resins did not seem to influence surface roughness. NextDent 5100 and Phrozen Sonic Mini 4K produced resins with similar cellular responses in human gingival fibroblasts. However, Denture 3D+ resin resulted in significantly lower biocompatibility, when compared to C&B MFH and Crowntec resins. Further testing is required to support its long-term use, required for complete dentures.

Abstract

Purpose. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different 3D dental resins, using a manufacturer recommended printer and a third-party printer, on cellular responses of human gingival cells. Materials and Methods. Three NextDent resins (Denture 3D+, C&B MFH and Crowntec) were used to produce specimens on printers NextDent 5100 (groups ND, NC and NT, respectively) and Phrozen Sonic Mini 4K (groups PD, PC and PT, respectively). Human gingival fibroblasts were cultured and biocompatibility was evaluated on days 1, 3 and 7. IL-6 and IL-8 concentrations were evaluated at 3 days using ELISA. Surface roughness was evaluated by a contact profilometer. SEM and fluorescence micrographs were analyzed at days 1 and 7. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS and mean differences were tested using ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey tests (P < .05). Results. There was an increase in cellular viability after 7 days in groups PC and PT, when compared to group PD. ND group resulted in higher concentration of IL-6 when compared to PT group. SEM and fluorescence micrographs showed less adhesion and thinner morphology of fibroblasts from group PD. No significant differences were found regarding surface roughness. Conclusion. The use of different printers or resins did not seem to influence surface roughness. NextDent 5100 and Phrozen Sonic Mini 4K produced resins with similar cellular responses in human gingival fibroblasts. However, Denture 3D+ resin resulted in significantly lower biocompatibility, when compared to C&B MFH and Crowntec resins. Further testing is required to support its long-term use, required for complete dentures.

참고문헌 (43)

  1. Davidowitz G, "The use of CAD", CAM in dentistry, 2011, pp.55, 559~570
  2. da Silva Salomão GV, "Analysis of digital workflow in implantology", Case Rep Dent, 2021, pp.6655908~ (2021)
  3. Wemken G, "Bond strength of conventional, subtractive, and additive manufactured denture bases to soft and hard relining materials", Dent Mater, 37, pp.928~938 (2021)
  4. Prpić V, "Comparison of mechanical properties of 3D-printed, CAD", CAM, and conventional denture base materials, 2020, pp.29, 524~528
  5. Chappuis Chocano AP, "Evaluation of the clinical performance of dentures manufactured by computer-aided technology and conventional techniques : A systematic review", J Prosthet Dent, 129, pp.547~553 (2023)
  6. Anadioti E, "3D printed complete removable dental prostheses : a narrative review", BMC Oral Health, 20, pp.343~ (2020)[DOI]
  7. Revilla-León M, "Additive manufacturing technologies used for processing polymers : current status and potential application in prosthetic dentistry", J Prosthodont, 28, pp.146~158 (2019)
  8. Shim JS, "Printing accuracy, mechanical properties, surface characteristics, and microbial adhesion of 3D-printed resins with various printing orientations", J Prosthet Dent, 124, pp.468~475 (2020)
  9. Kalberer N, "CAD-CAM milled versus rapidly prototyped(3D-printed)complete dentures : An in vitro evaluation of trueness", J Prosthet Dent, 121, pp.637~643 (2019)
  10. Vilela Teixeira AB, "Influence of 3D-printing parameters and characteristics of complete denture bases on evaluated properties : a scoping review", Int J Prosthodont, 36, pp.620~629 (2023)
  11. Wagner SA, "Digitally fabricated removable complete denture clinical workflows using additive manufacturing techniques", J Prosthodont, 30, pp.133~138 (2021)
  12. Schweiger J, "3D printing in digital prosthetic dentistry : an overview of recent developments in additive manufacturing", J Clin Med, 10, pp.2010~ (2021)
  13. Anadioti E, "Accuracy of dental and industrial 3D printers", J Prosthodont, 31, pp.30~37 (2022)
  14. Revilla-León M, "A review on chemical composition, mechanical properties, and manufacturing work flow of additively manufactured current polymers for interim dental restorations", J Esthet Restor Dent, 31, pp.51~57 (2019)
  15. Lo Russo L, "Intaglio surface trueness of milled and 3D-printed digital maxillary and mandibular dentures : A clinical study", J Prosthet Dent, 129, pp.131~139 (2023)
  16. Hwang HJ, "Assessment of the trueness and tissue surface adaptation of CADCAM maxillary denture bases manufactured using digital light processing", J Prosthet Dent, 121, pp.110~117 (2019)
  17. Yoon SN, "Tissue surface adaptation of CAD-CAM maxillary and mandibular complete denture bases manufactured by digital light processing : A clinical study", J Prosthet Dent, 124, pp.682~689 (2020)
  18. Schweiger J, "3D printing in digital prosthetic dentistry : an overview of recent developments in additive manufacturing", J Clin Med, 10, pp.2010~ (2021)
  19. Lemos CAA, "Does the use of an adhesive improve conventional complete dentures? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials", J Prosthet Dent, 128, pp.150~157 (2022)
  20. Srinivasan M, "CAD-CAM removable complete dentures : A systematic review and meta-analysis of trueness of fit, biocompatibility, mechanical properties, surface characteristics, color stability, time-cost analysis, clinical and patient-reported outcomes", J Dent, 113, pp.103777~ (2021)
  21. Srinivasan M, "CAD-CAM complete denture resins : an evaluation of biocompatibility, mechanical properties, and surface characteristics", J Dent, 114, pp.103785~ (2021)
  22. Cifuentes M, "Contact stomatitis", Clin Dermatol, 35, pp.435~440 (2017)
  23. Rashid H, "Allergic effects of the residual monomer used in denture base acrylic resins", Eur J Dent, 9, pp.614~619 (2015)
  24. Bieger V, "Fibroblast behavior on conventionally processed, milled, and printed occlusal device materials with different surface treatments", J Prosthet Dent, 129, pp.939~945 (2023)
  25. Srinivasan M, "Analysis of the residual monomer content in milled and 3D-printed removable CAD-CAM complete dentures : an in vitro study", J Dent, 120, pp.104094~ (2022)
  26. Labban N, "Effects of provisional acrylic resins on gingival fibroblast cytokine", growth factor expression, 2008, pp.100, 390~397
  27. Wedekind L, "Elution behavior of a 3D-printed, milled and conventional resin-based occlusal splint material", Dent Mater, 37, pp.701~710 (2021)
  28. Bürgers R, "Cytotoxicity of 3D-printed, milled, and conventional oral splint resins to L929cells and human gingival fibroblasts", Clin Exp Dent Res, 8, pp.650~657 (2022)
  29. Guerrero-Gironés J, "In vitro biocompatibility testing of 3D printing and conventional resins for occlusal devices", J Dent, 123, pp.104163~ (2022)
  30. Frasheri I, "Effects of resin materials dedicated for additive manufacturing of temporary dental restorations on human gingival keratinocytes", J Esthet Restor Dent, 34, pp.1105~1112 (2022)
  31. Yaneva-Deliverska M, "Biocompatibility of medical devices-legal regulations in the European union", J IMAB, 21, pp.705~708 (2015)
  32. You SM, "Evaluation of trueness in a denture base fabricated by using CAD-CAM systems and adaptation to the socketed surface of denture base : An in vitro study", J Prosthet Dent, 127, pp.108~114 (2022)
  33. Rogers HB, "Dental resins used in 3D printing technologies release ovo-toxic leachates", Chemosphere, 270, pp.129003~ (2021)
  34. Borelli B, "Polyacrylic resins regulate transcriptional control of interleukin-6, gp80, and gp130 genes in human gingival fibroblasts", J Oral Sci, 59, pp.87~91 (2017)
  35. Trubiani O, "Morphological analysis and interleukin release in human gingival fibroblasts seeded on different denture base acrylic resins", Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol, 25, pp.637~643 (2012)
  36. Wuersching SN, "Initial biocompatibility of novel resins for 3D printed fixed dental prostheses", Dent Mater, 38, pp.1587~1597 (2022)
  37. Popal M, "Cytotoxic and genotoxic potential of the type I photoinitiators BAPO and TPO on human oral keratinocytes and V79fibroblasts", Dent Mater, 34, pp.1783~1796 (2018)
  38. Van Landuyt KL, "Evaluation of cell responses toward adhesives with different photoinitiating systems", Dent Mater, 31, pp.916~927 (2015)
  39. Bieger V, "Fibroblast behavior on conventionally processed, milled, and printed occlusal device materials with different surface treatments", J Prosthet Dent, 129, pp.939~945 (2023)
  40. Rohr N, "Influence of material and surface roughness of resin composite cements on fibroblast behavior", Oper Dent, 45, pp.528~536 (2020)
  41. Duzyol M, "Assessing the impact of dental restorative materials on fibroblast cells : an immunohistochemical and ELISA analysis", Sci Rep, 14, pp.4725~ (2024)
  42. Al-Dwairi ZN, "A comparison of the surface and mechanical properties of 3D Printable denture-base resin material and conventional polymethylmethacrylate(PMMA)", J Prosthodont, 32, pp.40~48 (2023)
  43. Atria PJ, "3D-printed resins for provisional dental restorations : Comparison of mechanical and biological properties", J Esthet Restor Dent, 34, pp.804~815 (2022)

관련 논문AI추천

Comparing volumetric and biological aspects of 3D-printed interim restorations under various post-curing modes박찬, 송건, 손지원, 이빈나, 장우형, 장지현, 최성현대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2021 · 제13권 제2호Physical and biological assessment of a novel resin for digital light processing김영준, Cheol-Woong Jeong, Jeong-In Choi, Jin-Wook Shin, Jung-Hyuk Lee, Seong-Jun Ham치의학연구원 · Oral Biology Research2022 · 제46권 제2호Cytotoxic effect of 3D-printed and thermoformed clear aligner materials on human oral fibroblasts: An in vitro studyDanijela Kalibović Govorko, Gordana Paić Karega, Ivana Medvedec Mikić, Ivan Galić, Ivna Vuković Kekez, Katarina Vodanović Stranput, Nensi Bralić, Ružica Bandić, Vedrana Čikeš Čulić대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2025 · 제55권 제6호Wear of 3D printed and CAD/CAM milled interim resin materials after chewing simulation안진수, 여인성, 윤형인, 이재현, 한중석, Gerelmaa Myagmar대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2021 · 제13권 제3호Effect of repair methods and materials on the flexural strength of 3D-printed denture base resinAna Carolina Pero, Hamile Emanuella do Carmo Viotto, Marcela Dantas Dias Silva, Sabrina Romão Gonçalves Coelho, Thaís Soares Bezerra Santos Nunes대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2022 · 제14권 제5호Investigation of the marginal fit of a 3D-printed three-unit resin prosthesis with different build orientations and layer thicknesses곽재영, 김성균, 박지만, 양민성, 허성주대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2022 · 제14권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)