Accuracy and time efficiency of conventional and digital outlining of extensions of denture foundation on preliminary casts
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose. The purpose of this diagnostic study was to assess the accuracy and time efficiency of a digital method to draw the denture foundation extension outline on preliminary casts compared with the conventional technique. Materials and methods. A total of 28 preliminary edentulous casts with no anatomical landmarks were digitized using a laboratory scanner. The outlining of the entire basal seat of the denture was performed on preliminary casts and digitized. Casts with no extension outline were digitized and outlines were drawn using software (DWOS, Straumann). The accuracy of the extension outlined between both techniques was evaluated in the software (GOM Inspect; GOM GmbH) by file superimposition. Specificity and sensitivity tests were applied to measure accuracy. The paired t-test (95% CI) was used to compare the mean total area and the working time. Results. The accuracy ranged from 0.57 to 0.92. The buccal and labial frenulum showed a lower value in the maxilla (0.57); while the area between the retromolar pad and buccal frenulum (0.64) showed a lower score in the mandible. The maxillary denture foundation and the working time for both arches were significantly longer for the digital method (P < .001). Conclusion. The denture foundation extension outline exhibited a sufficiently excellent accuracy for the digital method, except for the maxillary anterior region. However, the digital method required a longer working time.
Abstract
Purpose. The purpose of this diagnostic study was to assess the accuracy and time efficiency of a digital method to draw the denture foundation extension outline on preliminary casts compared with the conventional technique. Materials and methods. A total of 28 preliminary edentulous casts with no anatomical landmarks were digitized using a laboratory scanner. The outlining of the entire basal seat of the denture was performed on preliminary casts and digitized. Casts with no extension outline were digitized and outlines were drawn using software (DWOS, Straumann). The accuracy of the extension outlined between both techniques was evaluated in the software (GOM Inspect; GOM GmbH) by file superimposition. Specificity and sensitivity tests were applied to measure accuracy. The paired t-test (95% CI) was used to compare the mean total area and the working time. Results. The accuracy ranged from 0.57 to 0.92. The buccal and labial frenulum showed a lower value in the maxilla (0.57); while the area between the retromolar pad and buccal frenulum (0.64) showed a lower score in the mandible. The maxillary denture foundation and the working time for both arches were significantly longer for the digital method (P < .001). Conclusion. The denture foundation extension outline exhibited a sufficiently excellent accuracy for the digital method, except for the maxillary anterior region. However, the digital method required a longer working time.
참고문헌 (36)
- Son SA, "Influence of different inlay configurations and distance from the adjacent tooth on the accuracy of an intraoral scan", J Prosthet Dent, 128, pp.680~687 (2022)
- John AV, "Two-visit CAD", CAM milled dentures in the rehabilitation of edentulous arches : A case series, 2019, pp.19, 88~92
- Chau RCW, "Accuracy of artificial intelligence-designed single-molar dental prostheses : A feasibility study", J Prosthet Dent, 131, pp.1111~1117 (2024)
- Baba NZ, "CAD", CAM complete denture systems and physical properties : a review of the literature, 2021, pp.30, 113~124
- Peng L, "Accuracy and reproducibility of virtual edentulous casts created by laboratory impression scan protocols", J Prosthet Dent, 120, pp.389~395 (2018)
- Marinello CP, "Digital removable complete denture-an overview", Curr Oral Health Rep, 8, pp.117~131 (2021)
- Srinivasan M, "CAD", CAM milled removable complete dentures : time and cost estimation study, 2019, pp.80, 75~79
- Peroz S, "Digital versus conventional complete dentures : A randomized, controlled, blinded study", J Prosthet Dent, 128, pp.956~963 (2022)
- Deng K, "Comparison of treatment outcomes and time efficiency between a digital complete denture and conventional complete denture : A pilot study", J Am Dent Assoc, 154, pp.32~42 (2023)
- Fang Y, "A technique for digital impression and bite registration for a single edentulous arch", J Prosthodont, 28, pp.e519~e523 (2019)
- Zarb GA, "Prosthodontic treatment for the edentulous patient", pp.2012, Mosby
- Patzelt SB, "Assessing the feasibility and accuracy of digitizing edentulous jaws", J Am Dent Assoc, 144, pp.914~920 (2013)
- Patel J, "Complete dentures : an update on clinical assessment and management : part 1", Br Dent J, pp.1~8 (2018)
- McCord JF, "Technical aspects of complete denture construction", Br Dent J, 189, pp.71~74 (2000)
- Veeraiyan DN, "Textbook of prosthodontic", pp.45~68 (2004), Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers Ltd
- Lynde TA, "Preparation of the denture-bearing area-an essential component of successful complete-denture treatment", Quintessence Int, 26, pp.689~695 (1995)
- Özkan YK, "Complete denture Prosthodontics", pp.2018, Springer
- Jamjoom FZ, "Impact of intraoral scanner, scanning strategy, and scanned arch on the scan accuracy of edentulous arches : An in vitro study", J Prosthet Dent, 131, pp.1218~1225 (2024)
- Li W, "Digital determination and recording of edentulous maxillomandibular relationship using a jaw movement tracking system", J Prosthodont, 31, pp.663~672 (2022)
- Hsu CY, "Effects of fabrication techniques on denture base adaptation : An in vitro study", J Prosthet Dent, 124, pp.740~747 (2020)
- Schubert O, "Accuracy of surface adaptation of complete denture bases fabricated using milling, material jetting, selective laser sintering, digital light processing, and conventional injection molding", Int J Comput Dent, 25, pp.151~159 (2022)
- Yoshidome K, "Trueness and fitting accuracy of maxillary 3D printed complete dentures", J Prosthodont Res, 65, pp.559~564 (2021)
- Deng K, "Evaluation of a novel 3D-printed custom tray for the impressions of edentulous jaws", J Dent, 125, pp.104279~ (2022)
- Tamaki T, "Outlining of denture foundation", Estomatologia Cultura, 3, pp.127~134 (1969)
- Cohen JF, "STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies : explanation and elaboration", BMJ Open, 6, pp.e012799~ (2016)
- McGarry TJ, "Classification system for complete edentulism. The American College of Prosthodontics", J Prosthodont, 8, pp.27~39 (1999)
- Ryu M, "Morphological investigation of residual ridge in Japanese edentulous elderly for fabrication of edentulous stock tray", Bull Tokyo Dent Coll, 60, pp.185~192 (2019)
- Landis JR, "The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data", Biometrics, 33, pp.159~174 (1977)
- Šimundić AM, "Measures of diagnostic accuracy : basic definitions", EJIFCC, 19, pp.203~211 (2009)
- Akobeng AK, "Understanding diagnostic tests 3 : Receiver operating characteristic curves", Acta Paediatr, 96, pp.644~647 (2007)
- Baratloo A, "Part 1 : Simple definition and calculation of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity", Emerg(Tehran), 3, pp.48~49 (2015)
- Klein IE, "Complete denture secondary impression technique to minimize distortion of ridge and border tissues", J Prosthet Dent, 54, pp.660~664 (1985)
- McCord JF, "Impression making", Br Dent J, 188, pp.484~492 (2000)
- Cristache CM, "Eighteen months follow-up with patient-centered outcomes assessment of complete dentures manufactured using a hybrid nanocomposite and additive CAD", CAM protocol, 2020, pp.9, 324~
- Wang Y, "The accuracy of intraoral scan in obtaining digital impressions of edentulous arches : a systematic review", J Evid Based Dent Pract, 24, pp.101933~ (2024)
- Park SY, "Integration of an intraoral scan and a conventional impression for fabricating complete dentures for a patient with flabby tissues", J Prosthet Dent, pp.S0022-3913(22)00757-0~ (2023)