A prospective multicenter clinical study on the efficiency of detachable ball- and spring-retained implant prosthesis
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. This prospective clinical study was conducted to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the freely detachable zirconia ball- and spring-retained implant prosthesis (BSRP) through a comparative analysis of screw- and cement-retained implant prosthesis (SCRP). MATERIALS AND METHODS. A multi-center, randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating the clinical usefulness of the detachable zirconia ball- and spring-retained implant prostheses was conducted. Sixty-four implant prostheses in 64 patients were examined. Periodic observational studies were conducted at 0, 3, 6, and 12 months after delivery of the implant prosthesis. Factors such as implant success rate, marginal bone resorption, periodontal pocket depth, plaque and bleeding index, and prosthetic complications were evaluated, respectively. RESULTS. During the 1-year observation period, all implants survived without functional problems and clinical mobility, showing a 100% implant success rate. Marginal bone resorption was significantly higher in the SCRP group than in the BSRP group only at the time of implant prosthesis delivery (P = .043). In all observation periods, periodontal pocket depth was slightly higher in the BSRP group than in the SCRP group, but there was no significant difference (P > .05). The modified plaque index (mPI) scores of both groups were moderate. Higher ratio of a score 2 in modified sulcus bleeding index (mBI) was observed in the BSRP group in the 6- and 12-months observation. CONCLUSION. Within the limitations of this study, the newly developed zirconia ball- and spring-retained implant prosthesis could be considered as an applicable and predictable treatment method along with the existing screw- and cement-retained prosthesis.
Abstract
PURPOSE. This prospective clinical study was conducted to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the freely detachable zirconia ball- and spring-retained implant prosthesis (BSRP) through a comparative analysis of screw- and cement-retained implant prosthesis (SCRP). MATERIALS AND METHODS. A multi-center, randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating the clinical usefulness of the detachable zirconia ball- and spring-retained implant prostheses was conducted. Sixty-four implant prostheses in 64 patients were examined. Periodic observational studies were conducted at 0, 3, 6, and 12 months after delivery of the implant prosthesis. Factors such as implant success rate, marginal bone resorption, periodontal pocket depth, plaque and bleeding index, and prosthetic complications were evaluated, respectively. RESULTS. During the 1-year observation period, all implants survived without functional problems and clinical mobility, showing a 100% implant success rate. Marginal bone resorption was significantly higher in the SCRP group than in the BSRP group only at the time of implant prosthesis delivery (P = .043). In all observation periods, periodontal pocket depth was slightly higher in the BSRP group than in the SCRP group, but there was no significant difference (P > .05). The modified plaque index (mPI) scores of both groups were moderate. Higher ratio of a score 2 in modified sulcus bleeding index (mBI) was observed in the BSRP group in the 6- and 12-months observation. CONCLUSION. Within the limitations of this study, the newly developed zirconia ball- and spring-retained implant prosthesis could be considered as an applicable and predictable treatment method along with the existing screw- and cement-retained prosthesis.
참고문헌 (40)
- Levine RA, "Multicenter retrospective analysis of the solid-screw ITI implant for posterior single-tooth replacements", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 17, pp.550~556 (2002)
- Heo YK, "A newly designed screw-and cement-retained prosthesis and its abutments", Int J Prosthodont, 28, pp.612~614 (2015)
- Weber HP, "Peri-implant soft-tissue health surrounding cementand screw-retained implant restorations: a multi-center, 3-year prospective study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 17, pp.375~379 (2006)
- Lee A, "Screw-versus cement-retained implant restorations : current concepts", Implant Dent, 19, pp.8~15 (2010)
- Pauletto N, "Complications associated with excess cement around crowns on osseointegrated implants : a clinical report", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 14, pp.865~868 (1999)
- Hebel KS, "Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations : achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry", J Prosthet Dent, 77, pp.28~35 (1997)
- Zarone F, "Fracture resistance of implant-supported screw-versus cement-retained porcelain fused to metal single crowns : SEM fractographic analysis", Dent Mater, 23, pp.296~301 (2007)
- Abrahamsson I, "The mucosal barrier following abutment dis", reconnection. An experimental study in dogs, 1997, pp.24, 568~572
- Taylor TD, "Twenty years of progress in implant prosthodontics", J Prosthet Dent, 88, pp.89~95 (2002)
- Chee W, "Cemented versus screw-retained implant prostheses : which is better?", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 14, pp.137~141 (1999)
- 윤나리, "시멘트 유지형 임플란트 보철물의 신개념 유지 방식: Fiber post의 설측 수평 삽입에 의한 유지력 보완", 대한치과보철학회지, 55(1), pp.71~78 (2017), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Clementini M, "Success rate of dental implants inserted in horizontal and vertical guided bone regenerated areas : a systematic review", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 41, pp.847~852 (2012)
- Quaranta A, "The impact of residual subgingival cement on biological complications around dental implants : a systematic review", Implant Dent, 26, pp.465~474 (2017)
- Goodacre CJ, "Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses", J Prosthet Dent, 90, pp.121~132 (2003)
- 최재원, "지르코니아 볼과 니켈-티타늄 스프링을 이용한 새로운 유지 형태를 가진 임플란트 고정성 보철물 수복 증례", 대한구강악안면임플란트학회지, 23(1), pp.16~24 (2019), 대한구강악안면임플란트학회[DOI]
- Choi JW, "Implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis with a microlocking implant prosthetic system : a clinical report", J Prosthet Dent, 123, pp.15~19 (2020)
- Abrahamsson I, "The mucosal barrier following abutment dis", reconnection. an experimental study in dogs, 1997, pp.24, 568~572
- Guichet DL, "Passivity of fit and marginal opening in screw-or cement-retained implant fixed partial denture designs", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 15, pp.239~246 (2000)
- Siamos G, "Relationship between implant preload and screw loosening on implant-supported prostheses", J Oral Implantol, 28, pp.67~73 (2002)
- Theoharidou A, "Abutment screw loosening in single-implant restorations : a systematic review", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 23, pp.681~690 (2008)
- Kallus T, "Loose gold screws frequently occur in full-arch fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants after 5 years", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 9, pp.169~178 (1994)
- Zarb GA, "Consensus report : towards optimized treatment outcomes for dental implants", J Prosthet Dent, 80, pp.641~ (1998)
- Froum SJ, "A proposed classification for peri-implantitis", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 32, pp.533~540 (2012)
- Mombelli A, "The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants", Oral Microbiol Immunol, 2, pp.145~151 (1987)
- Ferreira MA, "Nickel-titanium alloys : a systematic review", Dental Press J Orthod, 17, pp.71~82 (2012)
- Pun DK, "Corrosion behavior of shape memory, superelastic, and nonsuperelastic nickel-titanium-based orthodontic wires at various temperatures", Dent Mater, 24, pp.221~227 (2008)
- Bae EB, "Retrospective clinical study of a freely removable implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis by a microlocking system", Biomed Res Int, pp.7929585~ (2020)
- Choi JW, "Load-bearing capacity and retention of newly developed micro-locking implant prosthetic system : an in vitro pilot study", Materials(Basel), 11, pp.564~ (2018)
- Shin YG, "Influence of an implant fixture including a freely removable micro-locking implant prosthesis on peri-implant tissues and implant prostheses : a prospective clinical study", J Clin Med, 10, pp.3321~ (2021)
- Adell R, "A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw", Int J Oral Surg, 10, pp.387~416 (1981)
- De Smet E, "The influence of plaque and", or excessive loading on marginal soft and hard tissue reactions around Brånemark implants : a review of literature and experience, 2001, pp.21, 381~393
- Lang NP, "Histologic probe penetration in healthy and inflamed peri-implant tissues", Clin Oral Implants Res, 5, pp.191~201 (1994)
- Luterbacher S, "Diagnostic characteristics of clinical and microbiological tests for monitoring periodontal and peri-implant mucosal tissue conditions during supportive periodontal therapy(SPT)", Clin Oral Implants Res, 11, pp.521~529 (2000)
- Smithloff M, "The use of blade implants in a selected population of partially edentulous adults. a ten-year report", J Periodontol, 53, pp.413~418 (1982)
- Pjetursson BE, "A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses(FDPs)after a mean observation period of at least 5 years", Clin Oral Implants Res, 23, pp.22~38 (2012)
- Kim SK, "Screw loosening with interchangeable abutments in internally connected implants after cyclic loading", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 27, pp.42~47 (2012)
- Park JM, "An in vitro evaluation of the loosening of different interchangeable abutments in internal-connection-type implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 32, pp.350~355 (2017)
- Worthington P, "The Swedish system of osseointegrated implants : problems and complications encountered during a 4-year trial period", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2, pp.77~84 (1987)
- Jemt T, "Tooth movements adjacent to single-implant restorations after more than 15 years of follow-up", Int J Prosthodont, 20, pp.626~632 (2007)
- Wei H, "Implant prostheses and adjacent tooth migration : preliminary retrospective survey using 3-dimensional occlusal analysis", Int J Prosthodont, 21, pp.302~304 (2008)
