Clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures via Locator implant attachment and Locator bar attachment
2
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical findings and patient satisfaction on implant overdenture designed with Locator implant attachment or Locator bar attachment in mandibular edentulous patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Implant survival rate, marginal bone loss, probing depth, peri-implant inflammation, bleeding, plaque, calculus, complications, and satisfaction were evaluated on sixteen patients who were treated with mandibular overdenture and have used it for at least 1 year (Locator implant attachment: n=8, Locator bar attachment: n=8). RESULTS. Marginal bone loss, probing depth, plaque index of the Locator bar attachment group were significantly lower than the Locator implant attachment group (P<.05). There was no significant difference on bleeding, peri-implant inflammation, and patient satisfaction between the two denture types (P>.05). The replacement of the attachment components was the most common complication in both groups. Although there was no correlation between marginal bone loss and plaque index, a significant correlation was found between marginal bone loss and probing depth. CONCLUSION. The Locator bar attachment group indicates lesser marginal bone loss and need for maintenance, as compared with the Locator implant attachment group. This may be due to the splinting effect among implants rather than the types of Locator attachment.
Abstract
PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical findings and patient satisfaction on implant overdenture designed with Locator implant attachment or Locator bar attachment in mandibular edentulous patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Implant survival rate, marginal bone loss, probing depth, peri-implant inflammation, bleeding, plaque, calculus, complications, and satisfaction were evaluated on sixteen patients who were treated with mandibular overdenture and have used it for at least 1 year (Locator implant attachment: n=8, Locator bar attachment: n=8). RESULTS. Marginal bone loss, probing depth, plaque index of the Locator bar attachment group were significantly lower than the Locator implant attachment group (P<.05). There was no significant difference on bleeding, peri-implant inflammation, and patient satisfaction between the two denture types (P>.05). The replacement of the attachment components was the most common complication in both groups. Although there was no correlation between marginal bone loss and plaque index, a significant correlation was found between marginal bone loss and probing depth. CONCLUSION. The Locator bar attachment group indicates lesser marginal bone loss and need for maintenance, as compared with the Locator implant attachment group. This may be due to the splinting effect among implants rather than the types of Locator attachment.
참고문헌 (35)
- van Waas MA, "The influence of clinical variables on patients’satisfaction with complete dentures", J Prosthet Dent, 63, pp.307~310 (1990)
- Melas F, "Oral health impact on daily performance in patients with implant-stabilized overdentures and patients with conventional complete dentures", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 16, pp.700~712 (2001)
- Awad MA, "Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: a randomized clinical trial in a senior population", Int J Prosthodont, 16, pp.390~396 (2003)
- Batenburg RH, "Treatment concept for mandibular overdentures supported by endosseous implants: a literature review", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 13, pp.539~545 (1998)
- Feine JS, "The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients", Gerodontology, 19, pp.3~4 (2002)
- Schneider AL, "Bar overdentures utilizing the Locator attachment", Gen Dent, 49, pp.210~214 (2001)
- Trakas T, "Attachment systems for implant retained overdentures: a literature review", Implant Dent, 15, pp.24~34 (2006)
- Mericske-Stern RD, "Boucher’s Prosthodontic Treatment for Edentulous Patients", pp.527~ (1997), Mosby
- Burns DR, "Mandibular implant overdenture treatment: consensus and controversy", J Prosthodont, 9, pp.37~4610 (2000)
- Schneider AL, "The use of a self-aligning, low-maintenance overdenture attachment", Dent Today, 19, pp.24~26 (2000)
- 김민수, "Implant overdenture using a locator bar system by drill and tapping technique in a mandible edentulous patient: a case report", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 4(2), pp.116~120 (2012), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- "Technique manual Locator bar attachment system"[URL]
- Vere J, "Prosthodontic maintenance requirements of implant-retained overdentures using the locator attachment system", Int J Prosthodont, 25, pp.392~394 (2012)
- Wang F, "Maxillary four implant-retained overdentures via locator® attachment:Intermediate-term results from a retrospective study", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 18, pp.571~579 (2016)
- Mackie A, "Mandibular two-implant overdentures: three-year prosthodontic maintenance using the locator attachment system", Int J Prosthodont, 24, pp.328~331 (2011)
- Akça K, "Early-loaded one-stage implants retaining mandibular overdentures by two different mechanisms: 5-year results", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 28, pp.824~830 (2013)
- Krennmair G, "Patient preference and satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or locator attachments:a crossover clinical trial", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 27, pp.1560~1568 (2012)
- Cochran DL, "The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants", Clin Oral Implants Res, 13, pp.144~153 (2002)
- 유현상, "임플란트의 collar design이 변연골과 연조직에 미치는 영향", 대한치과보철학회지, 50(1), pp.21~28 (2012), 대한치과보철학회
- Quirynen M, "Periodontal aspects of osseointegrated fixtures supporting an overdenture. A 4-year retrospective study", J Clin Periodontol, 18, pp.719~728 (1991)
- Loe H, "Periodontal disease in pregnancy I. Prevalence and severity", Acta Odontol Scand, 21, pp.533~551 (1963)
- Mombelli A, "The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants", Oral Microbiol Immunol, 2, pp.145~151 (1987)
- Likert R, "A technique for the measurement of attitudes", Archives of Psychology, 22, pp.140~155 (1932)
- Pan S, "Sex differences in denture satisfaction", J Dent, 36, pp.301~308 (2008)
- Vervoorn JM, "Assessment of denture satisfaction", Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 16, pp.364~367 (1988)
- Bergendal T, "Implant-supported overdentures: a longitudinal prospective study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 13, pp.253~262 (1998)
- Krennmair G, "Implantsupported mandibular overdentures retained with a milled bar: a retrospective study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 22, pp.987~994 (2007)
- Lindquist LW, "Bone resorption around fixtures in edentulous patients treated with mandibular fixed tissue-integrated prostheses", J Prosthet Dent, 59, pp.59~63 (1988)
- Gotfredsen K, "Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or bar attachments: a randomized prospective 5-year study", Int J Prosthodont, 13, pp.125~130 (2000)
- Lekholm U, "Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fixtures. (II) A cross-sectional retrospective study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 15, pp.53~61 (1986)
- Quirynen M, "The reliability of pocket probing around screw-type implants", Clin Oral Implants Res, 2, pp.186~192 (1991)
- Walton JN, "Implant angulation: a measurement technique, implant overdenture maintenance, and the influence of surgical experience", Int J Prosthodont, 14, pp.523~530 (2001)
- Kuoppala R, "Outcome of implant-supported overdenture treatment-a survey of 58 patients", Gerodontology, 29, pp.e577~e584 (2012)
- Pasciuta M, "A prosthetic solution to restoring the edentulous mandible with limited interarch space using an implant-tissue-supported overdenture: a clinical report", J Prosthet Dent, 93, pp.116~120 (2005)
- Meijer HJ, "Location of implants in the interforaminal region of the mandible and the consequences for the design of the superstructure", J Oral Rehabil, 21, pp.47~56 (1994)