Clinical outcome of double crownretained implant overdentures with zirconia primary crowns
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. This retrospective study aims at the evaluation of implant-supported overdentures (IODs) supported by ceramo-galvanic double crowns (CGDCs: zirconia primary crowns + galvano-formed secondary crown). MATERIALS AND METHODS. In a private practice, 14 patients were restored with 18 IODs (mandible: 11, maxilla: 7) retained by CGDCs on 4 - 8 implants and annually evaluated for technical and/or biological failures/complications. RESULTS. One of the 86 inserted implants failed during the healing period (cumulative survival rate (CSR) implants: 98.8%). During the prosthetic functional period (mean: 5.9 ± 2.2 years), 1 implant demonstrated an abutment fracture (CSR-abutments: 98.2%), and one case of peri-implantitis was detected. All IODs remained in function (CSR-denture: 100%). A total of 15 technical complications required interventions to maintain function (technical complication rate: 0.178 treatments/patients/year). CONCLUSION. Considering the small sample size, the use of CGDCs for the attachment of IODs is possible without an increased risk oftechnical complications. However, for a final evaluation, results from a larger cohort are required.
Abstract
PURPOSE. This retrospective study aims at the evaluation of implant-supported overdentures (IODs) supported by ceramo-galvanic double crowns (CGDCs: zirconia primary crowns + galvano-formed secondary crown). MATERIALS AND METHODS. In a private practice, 14 patients were restored with 18 IODs (mandible: 11, maxilla: 7) retained by CGDCs on 4 - 8 implants and annually evaluated for technical and/or biological failures/complications. RESULTS. One of the 86 inserted implants failed during the healing period (cumulative survival rate (CSR) implants: 98.8%). During the prosthetic functional period (mean: 5.9 ± 2.2 years), 1 implant demonstrated an abutment fracture (CSR-abutments: 98.2%), and one case of peri-implantitis was detected. All IODs remained in function (CSR-denture: 100%). A total of 15 technical complications required interventions to maintain function (technical complication rate: 0.178 treatments/patients/year). CONCLUSION. Considering the small sample size, the use of CGDCs for the attachment of IODs is possible without an increased risk oftechnical complications. However, for a final evaluation, results from a larger cohort are required.
참고문헌 (32)
- Andreiotelli M, "Prosthodontic complications with implant overdentures: a systematic literature review", Int J Prosthodont, 23, pp.195~203 (2010)
- Koller B, "Survival rates of teeth, implants, and double crown-retained removable dental prostheses: a systematic literature review", Int J Prosthodont, 24, pp.109~117 (2011)
- Verma R, "A systematic review of the clinical performance of tooth-retained and implant-retained double crown prostheses with a follow-up of ≥ 3 years", J Prosthodont, 22, pp.2~12 (2013)
- Eitner S, "Comparing bar and double-crown attachments in implant-retained prosthetic reconstruction: a follow-up investigation", Clin Oral Implants Res, 19, pp.530~537 (2008)
- Weinländer M, "Removable implant-prosthodontic rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible:five-year results of different prosthetic anchorage concepts", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 25, pp.589~597 (2010)
- Krennmair G, "Removable four implant-supported mandibular overdentures rigidly retained with telescopic crowns or milled bars: a 3-year prospective study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 23, pp.481~488 (2012)
- Bernhart G, "Clinical success of implant-supported and tooth-implant-supported double crown-retained dentures", Clin Oral Investig, 16, pp.1031~1037 (2012)
- Schwarz S, "Survival of double-crown-retained dentures either tooth-implant or solely implant-supported: an 8-year retrospective study", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 16, pp.618~625 (2014)
- Heckmann SM, "Mandibular two-implant telescopic overdentures", Clin Oral Implants Res, 15, pp.560~569 (2004)
- Krennmair G, "Comparison of ball and telescopic crown attachments in implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 5-year prospective study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 26, pp.598~606 (2011)
- Frisch E, "Long-term results of implantsupported over-dentures retained by double crowns: a practice-based retrospective study after minimally 10 years follow-up", Clin Oral Implants Res, 24, pp.1281~1287 (2013)
- Frisch E, "Double crown-retained maxillary overdentures: 5-year follow-up", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 17, pp.22~31 (2015)
- Romanos GE, "Immediate loading of toothimplant-supported telescopic mandibular prostheses", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 27, pp.1534~1540 (2012)
- Weigl P, "Advanced biomaterials used for a new telescopic retainer for removable dentures", J Biomed Mater Res, 53, pp.320~336 (2000)
- Weigl P, "Advanced biomaterials used for a new telescopic retainer for removable dentures", J Biomed Mater Res, 53, pp.337~347 (2000)
- Beuer F, "Parameters affecting retentive force of electroformed double-crown systems", Clin Oral Investig, 14, pp.129~135 (2010)
- Bayer S, "Changes in retention force with electroplated copings on conical crowns: a comparison of gold and zirconia primary crowns", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 27, pp.577~585 (2012)
- Engels J, "Wear behavior of different double-crown systems", Clin Oral Investig, 17, pp.503~510 (2013)
- Raigrodski AJ, "Survival and complications of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses:a systematic review", J Prosthet Dent, 107, pp.170~177 (2012)
- Larsson C, "The clinical success of zirconiabased crowns: a systematic review", Int J Prosthodont, 27, pp.33~43 (2014)
- Kurbad A, "All-ceramic primary telescopic crowns with Cerec inLab", Int J Comput Dent, 6, pp.103~111 (2003)
- Uludag B, "Fabrication of zirconium primary copings to provide retention for a mandibular telescopic overdenture: a clinical report", Int J Prosthodont, 21, pp.509~510 (2008)
- Zafiropoulos GG, "Zirconia removable telescopic dentures retained on teeth or implants for maxilla rehabilitation. Threeyear observation of three cases", J Oral Implantol, 36, pp.455~465 (2010)
- Kurbad A, "CAD", CAM generated all-ceramic primary telescopic prostheses, 2012, pp.15, 237~249
- Albrektsson T, "The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1, pp.11~25 (1986)
- Albrektsson T, "Implant survival and complications. The Third EAO consensus conference 2012", Clin Oral Implants Res, 23, pp.63~65 (2012)
- Pjetursson BE, "Quality of reporting of clinical studies to assess and compare performance of implant-supported restorations", J Clin Periodontol, 39, pp.139~159 (2012)
- von Elm E, "The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies", J Clin Epidemiol, 61, pp.344~349 (2008)
- Rinke S, "Clinical Outcome of Double Crown-Retained Mandibular Removable Dentures Supported by a Combination of Residual Teeth and Strategic Implants", J Prosthodont (2014)
- Rinke S, "Prevalence of periimplant disease in partially edentulous patients: a practice-based cross-sectional study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 22, pp.826~833 (2011)
- Costa FO, "Peri-implant disease in subjects with and without preventive maintenance: a 5-year follow-up", J Clin Periodontol, 39, pp.173~181 (2012)
- Pjetursson BE, "Periimplantitis susceptibility as it relates to periodontal therapy and supportive care", Clin Oral Implants Res, 23, pp.888~894 (2012)