본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparison of retentive force and wear pattern of Locator® and ADD-TOC attachments combined with CAD-CAM milled bar

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in retention and wear pattern of Locator® and ADD-TOC attachments on a digital milled bar by performing chewing simulation and repeated insertion/removal of prostheses in fully edentulous models. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Locator (Locator®; Zest Anchors Inc., Escondido, CA, USA) was selected as the control group and ADD-TOC (ADDTOC; PNUAdd Co., Ltd., Busan, Republic of Korea) as the experimental group. A CAD-CAM milled bar was mounted on a master model and 3 threaded holes for connecting a bar attachment was formed using a tap. Locator and ADD-TOC attachments were then attached to the milled bar. Simulated mastication and repeated insertion/removal were performed over 400,000 cyclic loadings and 1,080 insertions/removals, respectively. Wear patterns on deformed attachment were investigated by field emission scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS. For the ADD-TOC attachments, chewing simulation and repeated insertion/removal resulted in a mean initial retentive force of 24.43 ± 4.89 N, which were significantly lower than that of the Locator attachment, 34.33 ± 8.25 N (P < .05). Amounts of retention loss relative to baseline for the Locator and ADD-TOC attachments were 21.74 ± 7.07 and 8.98 ± 5.76 N (P < .05). CONCLUSION. CAD-CAM milled bar with the ADD-TOC attachment had a lower initial retentive force than the Locator attachment. However, the ADD-TOC attachment might be suitable for long-term use as it showed less deformation and had a higher retentive force after simulated mastication and insertion/removal repetitions.

Abstract

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in retention and wear pattern of Locator® and ADD-TOC attachments on a digital milled bar by performing chewing simulation and repeated insertion/removal of prostheses in fully edentulous models. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Locator (Locator®; Zest Anchors Inc., Escondido, CA, USA) was selected as the control group and ADD-TOC (ADDTOC; PNUAdd Co., Ltd., Busan, Republic of Korea) as the experimental group. A CAD-CAM milled bar was mounted on a master model and 3 threaded holes for connecting a bar attachment was formed using a tap. Locator and ADD-TOC attachments were then attached to the milled bar. Simulated mastication and repeated insertion/removal were performed over 400,000 cyclic loadings and 1,080 insertions/removals, respectively. Wear patterns on deformed attachment were investigated by field emission scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS. For the ADD-TOC attachments, chewing simulation and repeated insertion/removal resulted in a mean initial retentive force of 24.43 ± 4.89 N, which were significantly lower than that of the Locator attachment, 34.33 ± 8.25 N (P < .05). Amounts of retention loss relative to baseline for the Locator and ADD-TOC attachments were 21.74 ± 7.07 and 8.98 ± 5.76 N (P < .05). CONCLUSION. CAD-CAM milled bar with the ADD-TOC attachment had a lower initial retentive force than the Locator attachment. However, the ADD-TOC attachment might be suitable for long-term use as it showed less deformation and had a higher retentive force after simulated mastication and insertion/removal repetitions.

참고문헌 (40)

  1. DeBoer J, "Edentulous implants : overdenture versus fixed", J Prosthet Dent, 69, pp.386~390 (1993)
  2. Ohkubo C, "Effect of implant support on distal-extension removable partial dentures : in vivo assessment", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 23, pp.1095~1101 (2008)
  3. Mijiritsky E, "Removable partial denture design involving teeth and implants as an alternative to unsuccessful fixed implant therapy : a case report", Implant Dent, 13, pp.218~222 (2004)
  4. Sadowsky SJ, "Mandibular implant-retained overdentures : a literature review", J Prosthet Dent, 86, pp.468~473 (2001)
  5. Närhi TO, "Changes in the edentulous maxilla in persons wearing implant-retained mandibular overdentures", J Prosthet Dent, 84, pp.43~49 (2000)
  6. Trakas T, "Attachment systems for implant retained overdentures : a literature review", Implant Dent, 15, pp.24~34 (2006)
  7. Zitzmann NU, "Treatment plan for restoring the edentulous maxilla with implant-supported restorations : removable overdenture versus fixed partial denture design", J Prosthet Dent, 82, pp.188~196 (1999)
  8. Watson CJ, "Implant complications and failures : the complete overdenture", Dent Update, 28, pp.234~238 (2001)
  9. van Kampen F, "Retention and postinsertion maintenance of bar-clip, ball and magnet attachments in mandibular implant overdenture treatment: an in vivo comparison after 3 months of function", Clin Oral Implants Res, 14, pp.720~726 (2003)
  10. Bakke M, "Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures : a prospective 5-year study", Int J Prosthodont, 15, pp.575~581 (2002)
  11. Sadowsky SJ, "Mandibular implant-retained overdentures : a literature review", J Prosthet Dent, 86, pp.468~473 (2001)
  12. Payne AG, "Mandibular implant-supported overdentures : a prospective evaluation of the burden of prosthodontic maintenance with 3 different attachment systems", Int J Prosthodont, 13, pp.246~253 (2000)
  13. Gotfredsen K, "Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or bar attachments : a randomized prospective 5-year study", Int J Prosthodont, 13, pp.125~130 (2000)
  14. Naert I, "A 5-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants in the mandibular overdenture therapy. Part I: Peri-implant outcome", Clin Oral Implants Res, 9, pp.170~177 (1998)
  15. Sadowsky SJ, "The implant-supported prosthesis for the edentulous arch : design considerations", J Prosthet Dent, 78, pp.28~33 (1997)
  16. Davodi A, "An implant-supported fixed-removable prosthesis with a milled tissue bar and Hader clip retention as a restorative option for the edentulous maxilla", J Prosthet Dent, 78, pp.212~217 (1997)
  17. Ercoli C, "Alternative procedure for making a metal suprastructure in a milled bar implant-supported overdenture", J Prosthet Dent, 80, pp.253~258 (1998)
  18. Brudvik JS, "The milled implant bar : an alternative to spark erosion", J Can Dent Assoc, 68, pp.485~488 (2002)
  19. Galindo DF, "The implant-supported milled-bar mandibular overdenture", J Prosthodont, 10, pp.46~51 (2001)
  20. Hebel KS, "Implant position record and implant position cast: minimizing errors, procedures and patient visits in the fabrication of the milled-bar prosthesis", J Prosthet Dent, 83, pp.107~116 (2000)
  21. Walton JN, "One-year prosthetic outcomes with implant overdentures : a randomized clinical trial", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 17, pp.391~398 (2002)
  22. Schneider AL, "Restoration of divergent free-standing implants in the maxilla", J Oral Implantol, 28, pp.113~116 (2002)
  23. 서용호, "Clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures via Locator implant attachment and Locator bar attachment", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 8(4), pp.313~320 (2016), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
  24. 김민수, "Implant overdenture using a locator bar system by drill and tapping technique in a mandible edentulous patient: a case report", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 4(2), pp.116~120 (2012), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
  25. Chiu LPY, "The effect of different water temperatures on retention loss and material degradation of locator attachments", J Prosthodont, 26, pp.537~544 (2017)
  26. Choi JW, "Retention and wear behaviors of two implant overdenture stud-type attachments at different implant angulations", J Prosthet Dent, 117, pp.628~635 (2017)
  27. Choi JW, "Load-bearing capacity and retention of newly developed micro-locking implant prosthetic system: an in vitro pilot study", Materials(Basel), 11, pp.564~ (2018)
  28. Choi JW, "Implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis with a microlocking implant prosthetic system : a clinical report", J Prosthet Dent, 123, pp.15~19 (2020)
  29. 최재원, "지르코니아 볼과 니켈-티타늄 스프링을 이용한 새로운 유지 형태를 가진 임플란트 고정성 보철물 수복 증례", 대한구강악안면임플란트학회지, 23(1), pp.16~24 (2019), 대한구강악안면임플란트학회[DOI]
  30. 오상천, "상악 완전 무치악에서 Locator^Ⓡ attachment가 장착된 milled titanium bar를 이용한 임플란트 지지 피개의치: 증례 보고", 구강회복응용과학지, 27(2), pp.223~231 (2011), 대한턱관절교합학회
  31. 최재원, "임플란트 bar 어태치먼트에 사용하는 두 가지 부가적인 유지장치의 유지력 특성 비교", 대한치과보철학회지, 59(2), pp.173~180 (2021), 대한치과보철학회
  32. Breeding LC, "The effect of simulated function on the retention of bar-clip retained removable prostheses", J Prosthet Dent, 75, pp.570~573 (1996)
  33. Manicone PF, "An overview of zirconia ceramics : basic properties and clinical applications", J Dent, 35, pp.819~826 (2007)
  34. ELsyad MA, "Locator versus bar attachment effect on the retention and stability of implant-retained maxillary overdenture : an in vitro study", J Prosthodont, 28, pp.e627~e636 (2019)
  35. Pigozzo MN, "The service life of implant-retained overdenture attachment systems", J Prosthet Dent, 102, pp.74~80 (2009)
  36. van Kampen F, "Retention and postinsertion maintenance of bar-clip, ball and magnet attachments in mandibular implant overdenture treatment: an in vivo comparison after 3 months of function", Clin Oral Implants Res, 14, pp.720~726 (2003)
  37. McKeen LW, "The effect of temperature and other factors on plastics and elastomers" (2014), William Andrew
  38. Chiu LPY, "The effect of different water temperatures on retention loss and material degradation of locator attachments", J Prosthodont, 26, pp.537~544 (2017)
  39. Long M, "Titanium alloys in total joint replacement-a materials science perspective", Biomaterials, 19, pp.1621~1639 (1998)
  40. Williams BH, "Retention of maxillary implant overdenture bars of different designs", J Prosthet Dent, 86, pp.603~607 (2001)

관련 논문AI추천

임플란트 bar 어태치먼트에 사용하는 두 가지 부가적인 유지장치의 유지력 특성 비교채성기, 최재원, 허중보대한치과보철학회 · 대한치과보철학회지2021 · 제59권 제2호Comparison of changes in retentive force of three stud attachments for implant overdentures김수민, 윤미정, 이소현, 전영찬, 정창모, 최재원, 허중보대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2015 · 제7권 제4호Effect of abutment angulation in the retention and durability of three overdenture attachment systems: An in vitro studyAna Cristina Braga, Antonio Sergio Silva, Carlos Aroso, Esther Berastegui, Jose Manuel Mendes, Raul Ustrell, Tomas Escuin대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2016 · 제8권 제1호Stress analysis of mandibular implant overdenture with locator and bar/clip attachment: Comparative study with differences in the denture base length권긍록, 노관태, 백장현, 유진숙, 이현종대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2017 · 제9권 제3호Effect of implant- and occlusal load location on stress distribution in Locator attachments of mandibular overdenture. A finite element studyAngel Alvarez-Arenal, Aritza Brizuela-Velasco, Elena Martin-Fernandez, Hector deLlanos-Lanchares, Ignacio Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Joseba Ellacuria-Echebarria대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2017 · 제9권 제5호임플란트 피개의치를 위한 개별유지형 어태치먼트의 유지력에 관한 연구김지영, 배은빈, 배지현, 송은주, 이소현, 최재원한국치위생과학회 · 치위생과학회지2016 · 제16권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)