본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Validity and Reliability of the Korean Versions of the 9- and 19-Item Wearing-Off Questionnaires in Parkinson’s Disease

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background and Purpose The wearing-off (WO) phenomenon is the most common motor complication in advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD), but its identification remains challenging. The 9- and 19-item Wearing-off Questionnaires (WOQ-9 and WOQ-19) are self-assessment tools for motor and nonmotor symptoms that are widely used for WO screening. We produced Korean versions of the WOQ-19 and WOQ-9 (K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9) and investigated their validity and reliability. Methods We used the translation–back translation method to produce K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9, which were self-administered by 124 patients with PD. We conducted in-depth 10-minute interviews for confirming the presence of the WO phenomenon, and then stratified the participants into groups with and without WO. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by analyzing receiver operating characteristic curves. Concurrent validity was assessed using the Movement Disorder Society–Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) and the Hoehn and Yahr stage with Spearman’s rank correlation analysis. Reliability was assessed based on test–retest Cohen’s kappa (κ) values and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results The optimal cutoff scores on the K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9 for WO screening were 4 and 2, respectively. The test–retest ICCs of K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9 were 0.943 and 0.938, respectively. Nineteen of the combined 20 items in K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9 showed moderate-to-substantial agreement (κ=0.412–0.771, p<0.001). The scores on the translated scales were significantly correlated with MDS-UPDRS IV scores. Conclusions K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9 are reliable and valid tools for detecting WO, with optimal cutoff scores of 4 and 2, respectively.

Abstract

Background and Purpose The wearing-off (WO) phenomenon is the most common motor complication in advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD), but its identification remains challenging. The 9- and 19-item Wearing-off Questionnaires (WOQ-9 and WOQ-19) are self-assessment tools for motor and nonmotor symptoms that are widely used for WO screening. We produced Korean versions of the WOQ-19 and WOQ-9 (K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9) and investigated their validity and reliability. Methods We used the translation–back translation method to produce K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9, which were self-administered by 124 patients with PD. We conducted in-depth 10-minute interviews for confirming the presence of the WO phenomenon, and then stratified the participants into groups with and without WO. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by analyzing receiver operating characteristic curves. Concurrent validity was assessed using the Movement Disorder Society–Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) and the Hoehn and Yahr stage with Spearman’s rank correlation analysis. Reliability was assessed based on test–retest Cohen’s kappa (κ) values and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results The optimal cutoff scores on the K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9 for WO screening were 4 and 2, respectively. The test–retest ICCs of K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9 were 0.943 and 0.938, respectively. Nineteen of the combined 20 items in K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9 showed moderate-to-substantial agreement (κ=0.412–0.771, p<0.001). The scores on the translated scales were significantly correlated with MDS-UPDRS IV scores. Conclusions K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9 are reliable and valid tools for detecting WO, with optimal cutoff scores of 4 and 2, respectively.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. Kim HJ, "Motor complications in Parkinson’s disease : 13-year followup of the CamPaIGN cohort", Mov Disord, 35, pp.185~190 (2020)
  2. Chou KL, "The spectrum of"off"in Parkinson’s disease : what have we learned over 40 years?", Parkinsonism Relat Disord, 51, pp.9~16 (2018)
  3. Chapuis S, "Impact of the motor complications of Parkinson’s disease on the quality of life", Mov Disord, 20, pp.224~230 (2005)
  4. Löhle M, "Validation of the PD home diary for assessment of motor fluctuations in advanced Parkinson’s disease", NPJ Parkinsons Dis, 8, pp.69~ (2022)
  5. Adams JL, "Digital technology in movement disorders : updates, applications, and challenges", Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep, 21, pp.16~ (2021)
  6. Stacy M, "Identification of motor and nonmotor wearing-off in Parkinson’s disease : comparison of a patient questionnaire versus a clinician assessment", Mov Disord, 20, pp.726~733 (2005)
  7. Mantese CE, "Clinimetrics of the 9-and 19-item wearing-off questionnaire : a systematic review", Parkinsons Dis, 2018, pp.5308491~ (2018)
  8. Ha ULN, "Validating the Vietnamese version of wearing–off 19 questionnaire for patients with Parkinson’s disease", Clin Park Relat Disord, 1, pp.37~40 (2019)
  9. Remigio KC, "Philippine translation and validation of the wearing-off questionnaire-19", Clin Park Relat Disord, 1, pp.21~24 (2019)
  10. Santos JG, "Specificity and sensibility of 9-itens wearing-off questionnaire in Brazilian Parkinson disease patient sample", Arq Neuropsiquiatr, 72, pp.867~873 (2014)
  11. Fukae J, "Utility of the Japanese version of the 9-item wearing-off questionnaire", Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 134, pp.110~115 (2015)
  12. Postuma RB, "MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson’s disease", Mov Disord, 30, pp.1591~1601 (2015)
  13. Park J, "Validation study of the official Korean version of the Movement Disorder Society-unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale", J Clin Neurol, 16, pp.633~645 (2020)
  14. Chaudhuri KR, "The metric properties of a novel non-motor symptoms scale for Parkinson’s disease : results from an international pilot study", Mov Disord, 22, pp.1901~1911 (2007)
  15. Park HJ, "Validation of the Korean version of the 39-item Parkinson’s disease questionnaire(PDQ-39)", Asian Nurs Res(Korean Soc Nurs Sci), 8, pp.67~74 (2014)
  16. McHugh ML, "Interrater reliability : the kappa statistic", Biochem Med(Zagreb), 22, pp.276~282 (2012)
  17. Altavista MC, "Wearing-off detection in clinical practice : the wearing off real practice key(WORK-PD)study in Parkinson’s disease", Parkinsonism Relat Disord, 21, pp.95~100 (2015)

관련 논문AI추천

Translation and Validation of the Korean Version of the 39-Item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire고성범, 권도영, 김재우, 김중석, 마효일, 백종삼, 안태범, 이필휴, 정선주, 조진환대한신경과학회 · Journal of Clinical Neurology2013 · 제9권 제1호Reliability and Validity of the Korean Short-form Eight-item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8)김세현, 김현숙, 박민정, 박혜자한국보건정보통계학회 · 보건정보통계학회지2020 · 제45권 제2호Validation of the Korean-Version of the Nonmotor Symptoms Scale for Parkinson’s Disease고성범, 권도영, 김재우, 김중석, 마효일, 백종삼, 안태범, 이필휴, 정선주, 조진환대한신경과학회 · Journal of Clinical Neurology2012 · 제8권 제4호Validation Study of the Official Korean Version of the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale강석윤, 강석재, 고성범, 권겸일, 김상진, 김재우, 김중석, 김한준, 김희태, 박건우, 박미영, 박성호, 박진세, 백종삼, 손영호, 안진영, 오응석, 윤진영, 이지영, 이필휴, 장우영, 전범석, 정선주, 조진환, 천상명, 허영은대한신경과학회 · Journal of Clinical Neurology2020 · 제16권 제4호Validation of the Korean Version of the Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale고성범, 권겸일, 권도영, 김미정, 김상진, 김연수, 김윤중, 김종민, 김중석, 김지선, 김지영, 김한준, 김희진, 김희태, 마효일, 박미영, 박형은, 백종삼, 성영희, 송인욱, 안태범, 양희준, 오응석, 유수연, 윤원태, 윤지영, 윤진영, 이수연, 이재혁, 이지영, 이필휴, 정선주, 조진환, 천상명, 최지현, 홍진용대한신경과학회 · Journal of Clinical Neurology2020 · 제16권 제2호Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire–Carer김성해, 김예린, 박정아, 서유진, 손영호, 이주희, 정석종대한신경과학회 · Journal of Clinical Neurology2023 · 제19권 제6호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)