한국과 중국의 커뮤니티 아트를 활용한 지역 문화 활성화 대표 사례 비교분석

Abstract

This study investigated and analyzed representative cases of Korea and China that revitalized local culture by combining the concept of community art created by combining the concept of community and the art of public art with the industrialization of the early 20th century. In order to maintain the objectivity of the analysis, the analysis of the similarity between the convergence of the attributes of the theoretical background and the axioms cited in previous studies, namely, Pascal Guillain, Miyazaki, Susan Lacey, Huangshanna, etc. Analysis elements were extracted before conducting this case analysis. The parameters of the analysis factors extracted by classifying places formation using representative community arts of Korea and China in the last 10 years according to the organizer's method, namely, the joint venture between Korea, Korea and China, and China. Five kinds of creation, experience, participation, communication, and relationship were substituted and the characteristics of each case were summarized. As a result, there were significant results. Among them, the case of Korea-China cooperation (case 2) and the case of Korea (case 3) differed in the case of China (case 1), relationship, participation, and communication. Analyzed. This is analyzed as a difference in the way of organizing due to the difference in concept between the two countries. In Korea, private sector participation with local governments, or bottom-up, is adopted, whereas in China, the top-down method administered by the central government is different. In conclusion, community art plays a significant role in revitalizing the local culture, and in each case, it is analyzed that various events are held to place the art space and promote experience, interaction and exchange among the people in it. However, in the case of Korean, excluding the case of China, contrary to the original intent, the visitor-centered local culture has been activated, and the local residents have developed in one direction that complains a lot of inconvenience. Recall that this is a true concept of vitalizing local culture, rethinking the authenticity of the way in which stakeholders operate, that is, for the mental demands of consumers by allowing art to interact with people, and forming non-forced relationships. It also suggests that alternative approaches will be needed for future implementation of similar projects.