The Reliability of Self- and Peer Assessment and Students’ Perceptions toward Peer and Teacher Assessment
2
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
The purpose of this study is to investigate the reliability of self- and peer assessment and students’ perceptions of peer and teacher assessment as students’ perspectives influence their learning. The data for this study were collected from 51 undergraduates taking an English oral presentation class in a university. Results were compared with the scores given by self, peers, and the instructor. The analysis of the data revealed that a greater correlation was found between peer and teacher assessments than between self- and teacher assessments. Thus, the study concluded that peer assessment is relatively more applicable than self-assessment for marking the students’ oral presentations; accordingly, including self-assessment marks into students’ presentation grades should be cautiously examined. In addition, this study examined students’ perceptions of peer and teacher assessment using a survey. The results indicated that students viewed both of them as beneficial and valuable for enhancing their oral presentation skills.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the reliability of self- and peer assessment and students’ perceptions of peer and teacher assessment as students’ perspectives influence their learning. The data for this study were collected from 51 undergraduates taking an English oral presentation class in a university. Results were compared with the scores given by self, peers, and the instructor. The analysis of the data revealed that a greater correlation was found between peer and teacher assessments than between self- and teacher assessments. Thus, the study concluded that peer assessment is relatively more applicable than self-assessment for marking the students’ oral presentations; accordingly, including self-assessment marks into students’ presentation grades should be cautiously examined. In addition, this study examined students’ perceptions of peer and teacher assessment using a survey. The results indicated that students viewed both of them as beneficial and valuable for enhancing their oral presentation skills.
참고문헌 (71)
- 김정렬, "비디오 피드백의 유형에 따른 초등학교 영어 말하기 학습효과", 영어교과교육, 6(1), pp.89~108 (2007)
- 정성희, "대학 전공연계 비즈니스 영어수업 비디오 피드백에 대한 학습자 인식 연구", 영어교과교육, 14(3), pp.209~232 (2015), 한국영어교과교육학회
- Bachman, L. F., "The construct validation of self-ratings of communicative language ability", Language Testing, 6(1), pp.14~29 (1989)
- Black, P., "Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education : Principles", Policy and Practice, 5(1), pp.7~74 (1998)
- Self-assessment of foreign language skills: Does it work?, "Blue, G. M.", 18~35, pp.CLE Working Papers, 3 (1994)
- "Student peer assessment. Learning Technology, 5" (2000)[URL]
- Boud, D., "Assessment for learning in higher education", pp.35~48 (1995), Kogan
- Boud, D., "Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher education : A critical analysis of findings", Higher Education, 18(5), pp.529~549 (1989)
- Bourhis, J., "The role of videotaped feedback in the instruction of public speaking : A quantitative synthesis of published empirical research", Communication Research Reports, 15(3), pp.256~261 (1998)
- Brindley, C., "Peer assessment in undergraduate programmes", Teaching in Higher Education, 3(1), pp.79~90 (1998)
- Brown, J. D., "New ways of classroom assessment. New ways in TESOL series II. Innovative classroom techniques" (1998), TESOL Publications
- Brown, J. D., "The alternatives in language assessment", TESOL Quarterly, 32(4), pp.653~675 (1998)
- Campbell, K. S., "Peer versus self assessment of oral business presentation performance", Business Communication Quarterly, 64(3), pp.23~40 (2001)
- Chang, C. C., "A comparative analysis of the consistency and difference among teacher-assessment, student self-assessment and peer-assessment in a Web-based portfolio assessment environment for high school students", Computers & Education, 58(1), pp.303~320 (2012)
- Cheng, W., "Having second thoughts : Student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise", Studies in Higher Education, 22(2), pp.233~239 (1997)
- Cheng, W., "Peer assessment of language proficiency", Language Testing, 22(1), pp.93~121 (2005)
- Cowan, J., "Developing student autonomy in learning", pp.192~210 (1988), Kogan Page
- Crooks, T. J., "The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students", Review of Educational Research, 58(4), pp.438~481 (1988)
- Dale, P., "Speech communication made simple 2" (2013), Pearson Education, Inc
- De Grez, L., "How effective are self-and peer assessment of oral presentation skills compared with teachers’ assessments?", Active Learning in Higher Education, 13(2), pp.129~142 (2012)
- Dochy, F. J. R. C., "The use of self-, peer, and co-assessment in higher education : A review", Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), pp.331~350 (1999)
- Dollisso, A., "An integrated framework for assessing oral presentations using peer, self, and instructor assessment strategies", NACTA Journal, 55(4), pp.39~44 (2011)
- Duke, C. R., "Giving students control over writing assessment", The English Journal, 83(4), pp.47~53 (1994)
- Esfandiari, R., "Severity differences among self-assessors, peer-assessors, and teacher assessors rating EFL essays", Assessing Writing, 18(2), pp.111~131 (2013)
- Falchikov, N., "Peer feedback marking : Developing peer assessment", Programmed Learning, 32(2), pp.175~187 (1995)
- Falchikov, N., "Involving students in assessment", Psychology Learning &Teaching, 3(2), pp.102~108 (2004)
- Andrew Finch, "Reflective Instruments for Self-Assessment in Korean EFL Classrooms", Korea TESOL Journal, 6(1), pp.63~86 (2003), 대한영어교육학회
- Freeman, M., "Peer assessment by groups of group work", Assessment &Evaluation in Higher Education, 20(3), pp.289~300 (1995)
- Freeman, M., "SPARK, a confidential web–based template for self and peer assessment of student teamwork : Benefits of evaluating across different subjects", British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), pp.551~569 (2002)
- Gibbs, G., "Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning", Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, pp.3~31 (2005)
- Hafner, J., "Quantitative analysis of the rubric as an assessment tool : An empirical study of student peer‐group rating", International Journal of Science Education, 25(12), pp.1509~1528 (2003)
- Hanrahan, S. J., "Assessing self-and peer-assessment : The students' views", Higher Education Research & Development, 20(1), pp.53~70 (2001)
- Hartmann, D. P., "Considerations in the choice of interobserver reliability estimates", Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10(1), pp.103~116 (1977)
- Hays, R. D., "Assessing quality of life in clinical trials: Methods and practice", pp.25~39 (2005), Oxford University Press
- Higgins, E. T., "Self-discrepancy : A theory relating self and affect", Psychological Review, 94(3), pp.319~ (1987)
- Howard, C. D., "Anonymity to promote peer feedback : Pre-service teachers' comments in asynchronous computer-mediated communication", Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43(1), pp.89~112 (2010)
- Hunt, J., "Language teaching and learning styles within and across cultures", pp.207~217 (1989), Institute of Language in Education
- Jafarpur, A., "Can naive EFL learners estimate their own proficiency?", Evaluation & Research in Education, 5(3), pp.145~157 (1991)
- Jupp, V., "The sage dictionary of social research methods" (2006), Sage Publications
- Langan, A. M., "Relationships between student characteristics and self, peer, and tutor evaluations of oral presentations", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2), pp.179~190 (2008)
- Langan, A. M., "Peer assessment of oral presentations : Effects of student gender, university affiliation, and participation in the development of assessment criteria", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(1), pp.21~34 (2005)
- Lindblom-ylänne, S., "Self-, peer-, and teacher-assessment of student essays", Active Learning in Higher Education, 7(1), pp.51~62 (2006)
- Magin, D., "Peer and teacher assessments of oral presentation skills : How reliable are they?", Studies in Higher Education, 26(3), pp.287~298 (2001)
- Matsuno, S., "Self-, peer-, and teacher-assessments in Japanese university EFL writing classrooms", Language Testing, 26(1), pp.75~100 (2009)
- McLaughlin, P., "Peer assessment in first year university : How the students feel", Studies in Educational Evaluation, 30(2), pp.135~149 (2004)
- McMillan, J. H., "Student self-assessment : The key to stronger student motivation and higher achievement", Educational Horizons, 87(1), pp.40~49 (2008)
- Morahan-Martin, J., "Should peers' evaluations be used in class projects? : Questions regarding reliability, leniency, and acceptance", Psychological Reports, 78(3), pp.1243~1250 (1996)
- Murphy, K., "Feed-forward : Students gaining more from assessment via deeper engagement in video-recorded presentations", Assessment &Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(2), pp.213~227 (2016)
- Ndoye, A., "Peer", self assessment and student learning, 2017, pp.29(2), 255~269
- Nicol, D. J., "Formative assessment and selfregulated learning : A model and seven principles of good feedback practice", Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), pp.199~218 (2006)
- Nunnally, J. C., "Psychometric theory" (1994), McGraw-Hill
- Orsmond, P., "The importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(3), pp.239~250 (1996)
- Orsmond, P., "A study in self‐assessment : Tutor and students’ perceptions of performance criteria", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 22(4), pp.357~368 (1997)
- Oscarson, M., "Self-assessment of language proficiency : Rationale and applications", Language Testing, 6(1), pp.1~13 (1989)
- Papinczak, T., "Peer assessment in problem-based learning : A qualitative study", Advances in Health Sciences Education, 12(2), pp.169~186 (2007)
- Paquet, M. R., "Students' acceptance of peer assessment", Education for Health, 11(1), pp.25~ (1998)
- Patri, M., "The influence of peer feedback on self-and peer-assessment of oral skills", Language Testing, 19(2), pp.109~131 (2002)
- Pond, K., "Peer review : A precursor to peer assessment", Programmed Learning, 32(4), pp.314~323 (1995)
- Pope, N. K. L., "The impact of stress in self-and peer assessment", Studies in Higher Education, 30(1), pp.51~63 (2005)
- Race, P., "500 tips on assessment" (2005), Routledge
- Sadler, D. R., "Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems", Instructional Science, 18(2), pp.119~144 (1989)
- Segers, M., "Optimising new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards", pp.1~12 (2003), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Sluijsmans, D., "Creating a learning environment by using self-, peer-and co-assessment", Learning Environments Research, 1(3), pp.293~319 (1998)
- Smith, H, "Improving the quality of undergraduate peer assessment: A case for student and staff development", Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39, pp.71~81 (2002)
- Stefani, L. A., "Peer, self, and tutor assessment : Relative reliabilities", Studies in Higher Education, 19(1), pp.69~75 (1994)
- Stemler, S. E., "A comparison of consensus, consistency, and measurement approaches to estimating interrater reliability", Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(4) (2004)
- Thomas, G., "Using self-and peer-assessment to enhance students’ future-learning in higher education", Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 8(1), pp.5~ (2011)
- Topping, K., "Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities", Review of Educational Research, 68(3), pp.249~276 (1998)
- Topping, K. J., "Peer assessment", Theory into Practice, 48(1), pp.20~27 (2009)
- Wen, M. L., "University students’ perceptions of and attitudes toward(online)peer assessment", Higher Education, 51(1), pp.27~44 (2006)
- Williams, E., "Student attitudes towards approaches to learning and assessment", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 17(1), pp.45~58 (1992)
