본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Sharing Peer Feedback: How Does It Affect EFL Learners’ Oral Presentation Skills?

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

The current study explores the effect of peer feedback in an English oral presentation class. Much of the previous research interest was given to finding out the degree of agreement between teacher and peer assessments or among students’ assessments, but not the expected advantages of peer assessment itself. Accordingly, 49 Korean EFL university students were recruited, and 25 (i.e., control group) were given only the instructor’s feedback, and the rest 24 (i.e., experimental group) were additionally given peer feedback. The students made five presentations in total, and their midterm and final exam scores between the two groups were compared through independent samples t-tests. The midterm scores were quite similar, but statistically significant differences were observed for the final exam scores. This meant that those who shared peer feedback as a small group during the semester performed much better on the final exam by improving their oral proficiency. Moreover, their responses to a survey questionnaire indicated that they perceived they had greatly improved presentation skills through peer feedback task. In particular, it seemed that small group work and intimacy helped them more to maximize the effect of peer feedback. Pedagogical implications and limitations of this study are further discussed.

Abstract

The current study explores the effect of peer feedback in an English oral presentation class. Much of the previous research interest was given to finding out the degree of agreement between teacher and peer assessments or among students’ assessments, but not the expected advantages of peer assessment itself. Accordingly, 49 Korean EFL university students were recruited, and 25 (i.e., control group) were given only the instructor’s feedback, and the rest 24 (i.e., experimental group) were additionally given peer feedback. The students made five presentations in total, and their midterm and final exam scores between the two groups were compared through independent samples t-tests. The midterm scores were quite similar, but statistically significant differences were observed for the final exam scores. This meant that those who shared peer feedback as a small group during the semester performed much better on the final exam by improving their oral proficiency. Moreover, their responses to a survey questionnaire indicated that they perceived they had greatly improved presentation skills through peer feedback task. In particular, it seemed that small group work and intimacy helped them more to maximize the effect of peer feedback. Pedagogical implications and limitations of this study are further discussed.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. K. Topping, "Peer-assessment between students in colleges and universities", Review of Educational Research, 68(3), pp.249~276 (1998)
  2. P. Black, "Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice" (2003), Open University Press
  3. "Assessment manifesto" (2008)[URL]
  4. W. Weaver, "Peer evaluation: A case study", Innovative Higher Education, 11, pp.25~39 (1986)
  5. E. White, "Student perspectives of peer assessment for learning in a public speaking course", Asian EFL Journal – Professional Teaching Articles, 33, pp.1~36 (2009)
  6. J. Otoshi, "Factors predicting effective oral presentations in EFL classrooms", 10(1), pp.65~78 (2008)
  7. 이희경, "영어 말하기 능력의 다집단 교실 평가 가능성에 대한 연구 - 자기, 동료, 교사평가를 중심으로 -", 영어교육연구, 21(4), pp.241~264 (2009), 팬코리아영어교육학회
  8. E. Y. Park, "Alternative assessment of English presentation in college English course", Inmunhak-yeon-gu, 22, pp.109~125 (2014)
  9. M. Patri, "The influence of peer feedback on self- and peer-assessment of oral skills", Language Testing, 19(2), pp.109~131 (2002)
  10. X. Lv, "Peer assessment of perception and attitudes in public speaking English classes", World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 11(4), pp.445~449 (2013)
  11. R. B. Rahmat, "Peer feedback: A case study of assessment for learning in a Singaporean classroom", GSE Journal of Education, pp.64~87 (2013)
  12. K. Topping, "Peer assessment", Theory Into Practice, 48(1), pp.20~27 (2009)
  13. J. D. Bransford, "How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school" (1999), National Academy Press
  14. J. Kaufman, "Students’ perceptions about peer assessment for writing: Their origin and impact on revision work", Instructional Science, 39(3), pp.387~406 (2011)
  15. 주경숙, "중학교 2학년 영어 말하기 수행평가에서 평가 방법에 따른 역류효과의 비교연구 : 교사평가, 자가평가, 동료평가를 중심으로", 석사, 영어교육, pp.2003
  16. M. Freeman, "Peer feedback barking: Developing peer assessment", Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 20, pp.289~299 (1995)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (39건)