본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

입력 중심과 출력 중심 형태초점 접근법이 중학생 영어 문법 학습에 미치는 영향

The effects of input-based and output-based focus-on-form approaches on the development of English grammar ability of Korean middle school students

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The study investigated the differential effects of focus-on-form approaches in terms of input-based and output-based instructions on the learning of target grammar features, as well as how the approaches differed according to the learners' levels of proficiency in the target forms. A total of 47 first-year students from a middle school were randomly assigned to two experimental groups. The first group received input processing (IP) instruction while the other group received output-based (OB) instruction and was asked to use the target forms to complete assigned communicative tasks. Each treatment was offered for 10 weeks. The students' proficiency levels were grouped into two main levels based on their responses to a pretest of the target features. The findings showed that both approaches had no significant difference and had helped the students develop the target forms. But, the students with higher proficiency levels in OB instruction had outperformed, especially on the production test, their counterparts who had received IP instruction, indicating that the instructional effects could vary according to the proficiency levels.

Abstract

The study investigated the differential effects of focus-on-form approaches in terms of input-based and output-based instructions on the learning of target grammar features, as well as how the approaches differed according to the learners' levels of proficiency in the target forms. A total of 47 first-year students from a middle school were randomly assigned to two experimental groups. The first group received input processing (IP) instruction while the other group received output-based (OB) instruction and was asked to use the target forms to complete assigned communicative tasks. Each treatment was offered for 10 weeks. The students' proficiency levels were grouped into two main levels based on their responses to a pretest of the target features. The findings showed that both approaches had no significant difference and had helped the students develop the target forms. But, the students with higher proficiency levels in OB instruction had outperformed, especially on the production test, their counterparts who had received IP instruction, indicating that the instructional effects could vary according to the proficiency levels.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 송윤희, "영어 시제 학습에서 형태초점 교수법의 효과", 영어어문교육, 18(4), pp.361~384 (2012), 한국영어어문교육학회
  2. 유범, "중학교 1학년 영어 과정의문법학습 부진 원인과 해결 방안 연구", 영어교과교육, 15(3), pp.161~184 (2016), 한국영어교과교육학회[DOI]
  3. 이제영, "메타분석을 통한 영어 교과에서의 문법 교육의 효과 분석", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 16(1), pp.743~752 (2016), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
  4. 이창희, "입력과 출력 중심의 형태 초점 교수법이 초등 영어 학습자의 문법 능력 향상에 미치는 영향", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 16(12), pp.883~903 (2016), 학습자중심교과교육학회[DOI]
  5. 정희윤, "중학교 영어 교과서 문법 활동 분석과학생들의 인식 조사", 영어교과교육, 16(1), pp.129~146 (2017), 한국영어교과교육학회[DOI]
  6. 조윤경, "입력과 출력중심 형태초점 의사소통 활동 및 학습자의 사전지식 수준이 목표문법항목에의 주목과 학습에 미치는 영향", 응용언어학, 28(2), pp.221~257 (2012), 한국응용언어학회
  7. 정혜진, "Effects of Input Processing and Output-enriched Consciousness-raising Instruction on Learning Different Types of English Verb Forms", 영어교육연구, 20(3), pp.27~48 (2008), 팬코리아영어교육학회[DOI]
  8. Doughty, C., "Cognition and second language instruction", pp.206~257 (2001), Cambridge University Press
  9. Doughty, C., "Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition", pp.197~261 (1998), Cambridge University Press
  10. Ellis, R., "Input-based approach to teaching grammar: A review of classroom-oriented research", Annual Reviews of Applied Linguistics, 19, pp.64~80 (1999)
  11. Goh, C. C. M., "Teaching speaking: A holistic approach" (2012), Cambridge University Press
  12. Hadfield, J., "Elementary grammar games: Photocopiable material" (2001), Longman
  13. Hadfield, J., "Beginners' communication games: Photocopiable material" (2002), Longman
  14. Izumi, S., "Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis: An experimental study on ESL relativisation", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(4), pp.541~577 (2002)
  15. 강동호, "The Differential Effects of Input and Output Instructions on Noticing and Learning", 현대영미어문학, 31(3), pp.1~21 (2013), 현대영미어문학회
  16. 김지현, "The Story of Recasts in SLA to Date", 영어교육연구, 23(2), pp.47~67 (2011), 팬코리아영어교육학회[DOI]
  17. Larsen-Freeman, D., "Teaching English as a second or foreign language", pp.251~266 (2001), Heinle
  18. Larsen-Freeman, D., "An introduction to second language acquisition research" (1990), Longman
  19. Lee, Hwa-ja, "A Comparative Study on the Awareness of Grammar Instructional Approach by EFL Teachers and Learners", 영어교육, 60(1), pp.69~96 (2005), 한국영어교육학회
  20. Long, M. H., "Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective", pp.39~52 (1991), Benjamins
  21. Schmidt, R., "Attention and awareness in foreign language learning", pp.1~63 (1995), University of Hawaii Press
  22. Smith, M. S., "Consciousness-raising and the second language learner", Applied Linguistics, 2(2), pp.159~168 (1981)
  23. Swain, M., "Input in second language acquisition", pp.235~253 (1985), Newbury House
  24. Swain, M., "Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning", pp.471~484 (2005), Lawrence Erlbaum
  25. VanPatten, B., "Attending to form and content in the input", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12(3), pp.287~301 (1990)
  26. VanPatten, B., "Input processing and grammar instruction in second language acquisition" (1996), Ablex

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)