본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

입력 빈도 분포 유형 및 형태초점접근 교수 기법의 명시성의 정도가 제2언어 문법 학습에 미치는 영향

Effects of types of input frequency distribution and degrees of explicitness of focus-on-form techniques on second language grammar learning.

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

In an effort to find a way to optimize the learning condition, this study examined the effects of two types of input frequency distribution, skewed-first distribution (SFD) versus balanced distribution (BD), and two types of focus-on-form techniques, input processing (IP) versus input enhancement (IE), on the learning of English participles by Korean middle school students. A total of 91 students participated in this study, divided into five subgroups: SFD + IP, SFD + IE, BD + IP, BD + IE, and Control. The learning outcomes and the generalizability of the learned knowledge were measured through scaled judgment tasks and picture description tasks, immediately after treatment as well as one week later. The results showed that the input frequency distribution factor did not have statistically significant effects on learning and generalizability, while the degrees of explicitness of focus-on-form techniques had statistically significant effects on both. The interaction effects of the two main factors were not statistically significant. More detailed findings are presented with some pedagogical implications for Korean EFL classrooms.

Abstract

In an effort to find a way to optimize the learning condition, this study examined the effects of two types of input frequency distribution, skewed-first distribution (SFD) versus balanced distribution (BD), and two types of focus-on-form techniques, input processing (IP) versus input enhancement (IE), on the learning of English participles by Korean middle school students. A total of 91 students participated in this study, divided into five subgroups: SFD + IP, SFD + IE, BD + IP, BD + IE, and Control. The learning outcomes and the generalizability of the learned knowledge were measured through scaled judgment tasks and picture description tasks, immediately after treatment as well as one week later. The results showed that the input frequency distribution factor did not have statistically significant effects on learning and generalizability, while the degrees of explicitness of focus-on-form techniques had statistically significant effects on both. The interaction effects of the two main factors were not statistically significant. More detailed findings are presented with some pedagogical implications for Korean EFL classrooms.

참고문헌 (42)

  1. Bock, J. K., "The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning?", Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(2), pp.177~192 (2000)
  2. Boyd, J. K., "Input effects within a constructionist framework", Modern Language Journal, 93(3), pp.418~429 (2009)
  3. Brooks, P. J., "How children constrain their argument structure constructions", Language, 75(4), pp.720~738 (1999)
  4. Bybee, J., "Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition", pp.216~236 (2008), Routledge
  5. Bybee, J., "Language, usage, and cognition" (2010), Cambridge University Press
  6. Casenhiser, D., "Fast mapping between a phrasal form and meaning", Developmental Science, 8(6), pp.500~508 (2005)
  7. Doughty, C., "Second language instruction does make a difference : Evidence from an empirical study of ESL relativization", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13(4), pp.431~469 (1991)
  8. Doughty, C., "Cognition and second language instruction", pp.206~257 (2001), Cambridge University Press
  9. Doughty, C., "Focus on form in classroom and second language acquisition" (1998), Cambridge University Press
  10. Ellis, N. C., "The handbook of language teaching", pp.139~157 (2009), Blackwell
  11. Goldberg, A. E., "Learning argument structure generalizations", Cognitive Linguistics, 15(3), pp.289~316 (2004)
  12. Goldberg, A. E., "Constructions as categories of language", New Ideas in Psychology, 25(2), pp.70~86 (2007)
  13. Goldschneider, J. M., "Explaining the"natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition"in English : A Meta‐analysis of multiple determinants", Language Learning, 51(1), pp.1~50 (2001)
  14. Juffs, A., "Discussion : Verb classes, event structure, and second language learners’ knowledge of semantics-syntax correspondences", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(2), pp.305~313 (2001)
  15. Larsen-Freeman, D., "Teaching English as a second or foreign language", pp.251~266 (2001), Heinle & Heinle
  16. Lee, H. -Y., "Effects of input distribution on the acquisition of the ditransitive construction by Korean elementary school English learners", Master, pp.2016
  17. Lee, J. F., "The incidental acquisition of Spanish : Future tense morphology through reading in a second language", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(1), pp.55~80 (2002)
  18. Lee, J. F., "Making communicative language teaching happen" (2003), McGraw-Hill
  19. Lee, S. -K., "Salience, frequency, and aptitude in the learning of accusative in a second language: An input enhancement study", Doctor, pp.2008
  20. Lee, S. -K., "New horizons in English education research", pp.245~271 (2014), Seoul National University Press
  21. Lee, S. -K., "Visual input enhancement and grammar learning : A meta-analytic review", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(3), pp.307~331 (2008)
  22. Loewen, S., "The effectiveness of visual input enhancement on the noticing and L2 development of the Spanish past tense", Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(1), pp.89~110 (2016)
  23. Long, M. H., "Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective", pp.39~52 (1991), Benjamins
  24. Long, M. H., "Focus on form in second language acquisition", pp.15~41 (1998), Cambridge University Press
  25. McDonough, K., "Comparing the effect of skewed and balanced input on English as a foreign language learners’ comprehension of the double-object dative construction", Applied Psycholinguistics, 35(2), pp.419~442 (2012)
  26. McDonough, K., "Learning a novel pattern through balanced and skewed input", Bilingualism, 16(3), pp.654~662 (2013)
  27. Nakamura, D., "Input skewedness, consistency, and order of frequent verbs in frequency-driven second language construction learning : A replication and extension of Casenhiser and Goldberg(2005)to adult second language acquisition", International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 50(1), pp.1~37 (2012)
  28. Nassaji, H., "Teaching grammar in second language classrooms: Integrating form-focused instruction in communicative context" (2011), Routledge
  29. Norris, J., "Effectiveness of L2 instruction : A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis", Language Learning, 50(3), pp.417~528 (2000)
  30. Ortega, L., "Language learning, discourse, and cognition: Studies in the tradition of Andrea Tyler", pp.213~248 (2018), John Benjamins
  31. 박향숙, "Visual Input Enhancement, Attention, Grammar Learning, & Reading Comprehension: An Eye Movement Study", 영어교육, 67(4), pp.241~265 (2012), 한국영어교육학회[DOI]
  32. Rhee, J. -H., "Effects of types of input frequency distribution and degrees of explicitness of focus-on-form techniques on Korean middle schoolers’ learning of English participles", Master, pp.2020
  33. Rott, S., "The effect of frequency of input‐enhancement on word learning and text comprehension", Language Learning, 57(2), pp.165~199 (2007)
  34. Sanz, C., "Positive evidence versus explicit rule presentation and explicit negative feedback : A Computer-assisted study", Language Learning, 54(1), pp.35~78 (2004)
  35. Schmidt, R., "The role of consciousness in second language learning", Applied Linguistics, 11(2), pp.129~158 (1990)
  36. Schmidt, R., "Cognition and second language instruction", pp.3~32 (2001), Cambridge University Press
  37. 신선화, "통사 점화와 입력 분포 유형이문법 학습에 미치는 영향", 영어교육, 70(2), pp.133~154 (2015), 한국영어교육학회[DOI]
  38. 신유나, "입력 빈도 분포 유형이 제2언어 구문 학습에 미치는 영향", 어학연구, 54(3), pp.509~529 (2018), 언어교육원[DOI]
  39. Sung, M. -J., "Effects of types of input distribution on the learning of grammatical rules by Korean elementary school students", Paper presented at the 2013 KATE International Conference (2013)
  40. VanPatten, B., "Input processing and grammar instruction in second language acquisition" (1996), Ablex
  41. VanPatten, B., "Processing instruction : An update", Language Learning, 52(4), pp.755~803 (2002)
  42. Year, J., "Korean speakers’ acquisition of the English ditransitive construction : The role of verb prototype, input distribution, and frequency", The Modern Language Journal, 93(3), pp.399~417 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)