본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The effects of input-enhanced and output-enhanced grammar instruction on the learning of English verb tenses and relative clauses

황희정
교과교육연구소 (Research Institute of Curriculum & Instruction)|2014.09|교과교육학연구 (Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction)|제18권 제3호|pp. 775-805|DOI 10.24231/rici.2014.18.3.775

2

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

형태초점교수법dictoglossfocus on form instruction딕토글로스입력강화출력강화input-enhancedoutput-enhancedtypographical input enhancement시각적입력강화

초록

The present study investigated whether different types of form-focused instruction, input-enhanced or output-enhanced, might be effective in improving low-proficiency learners' English knowledge about specific linguistic forms. The participants were 111 first-year Korean university students enrolled in an English conversation course. They were assigned to three groups; 35 students in the input-enhanced group (TIE), 33 in the output-enhanced group (DICT), and 45 in the control group (CG). English verb tenses and relative clauses were selected as the target structures. Pre- and post-tests were conducted to measure the effectiveness of different types of form-focused instruction on the acquisition of the target forms. Pre- and post-questionnaires were administered to examine the extent of the students' perceptions and attitudes towards the English instruction that they received. The study discovered that both input-enhanced and output-enhanced instruction were more effective than traditional grammar instruction in developing grammatical knowledge about verb tenses, while output-enhanced instruction was more effective than input-enhanced and traditional grammar instruction with respect to the learning of relative clauses. The results of the questionnaires indicated that learners who performed the TIE task and the dictogloss task showed positive changes in their perceptions about the English instruction that they received; only those in the dictogloss task showed positive changes in their attitudes towards the instruction. Based on the results, the limitations of the study and the pedagogical implications are provided.

Abstract

The present study investigated whether different types of form-focused instruction, input-enhanced or output-enhanced, might be effective in improving low-proficiency learners' English knowledge about specific linguistic forms. The participants were 111 first-year Korean university students enrolled in an English conversation course. They were assigned to three groups; 35 students in the input-enhanced group (TIE), 33 in the output-enhanced group (DICT), and 45 in the control group (CG). English verb tenses and relative clauses were selected as the target structures. Pre- and post-tests were conducted to measure the effectiveness of different types of form-focused instruction on the acquisition of the target forms. Pre- and post-questionnaires were administered to examine the extent of the students' perceptions and attitudes towards the English instruction that they received. The study discovered that both input-enhanced and output-enhanced instruction were more effective than traditional grammar instruction in developing grammatical knowledge about verb tenses, while output-enhanced instruction was more effective than input-enhanced and traditional grammar instruction with respect to the learning of relative clauses. The results of the questionnaires indicated that learners who performed the TIE task and the dictogloss task showed positive changes in their perceptions about the English instruction that they received; only those in the dictogloss task showed positive changes in their attitudes towards the instruction. Based on the results, the limitations of the study and the pedagogical implications are provided.

참고문헌 (54)

  1. 강문구, "영어 시제의 효율적인 교수·학습 전략", 영어어문교육, 13(3), pp.133~156 (2007), 한국영어어문교육학회
  2. 박정주, "중학교 영어 문법 수업에서 Dictogloss의 효과에 관한 연구", Foreign Languages Education, 16(1), pp.147~171 (2009), 한국외국어교육학회
  3. 송윤희, "영어 시제 학습에서 형태초점 교수법의 효과", 영어어문교육, 18(4), pp.361~384 (2012), 한국영어어문교육학회
  4. 성상희, "형태초점접근법의 명시성의 정도가 중학교 영어 학습자의 관계대명사 구문 습득에 미치는 영향", 영어학, 13(3), pp.549~570 (2013), 한국영어학회
  5. 장은혜, "장르에 따른 dictogloss 활동이 한국 중학생들의 영어 듣기 능력과 태도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 교과교육학연구, 16(4), pp.1021~1044 (2012), 교과교육연구소
  6. Alanen, R., "Attention and awareness in foreign language learning and teaching", pp.259~302 (1995), University of Hawaii Press
  7. Choi, S. Y., "The effects of form focused instruction based on three functions of output", master, pp.2009
  8. Doughty, C., "Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition" (1998), Cambridge University Press
  9. Ellis, R., "Input-based approaches to teaching grammar: A review of classroom-oriented research", Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, pp.64~80 (1999)
  10. Ellis, R., "SLA Research and Language Teaching" (2001), Oxford University
  11. Ellis, R., "The roles of modified input and output in the incidental acquisition of word meanings", Studies in Second language Acquisition, 21(2), pp.285~301 (1999)
  12. Flynn, S. W., "Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition", pp.89~108 (1989), Cambridge University Press
  13. Fotos, S., "Consciousness raising and noticing through focus on form : Grammar task performance vs. formal instruction", Applied Linguistics, 14(4), pp.385~407 (1993)
  14. 한영주, "Exploring Task Effects: Focus on Form in Dictogloss and Grammar-discovery Tasks", 새한영어영문학, 49(2), pp.195~216 (2007), 새한영어영문학회
  15. Harley, B., "Appealing to consciousness in the L2 classroom", AILA Review, 11, pp.57~68 (1994)
  16. Hwang, J. B., "Focus on form and the L2 learning of English unaccusative verbs", English Teaching, 56(3), pp.111~133 (2001)
  17. Izumi, S., "Out, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis : An experimental study on ESL relativization", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, pp.541~577 (2002)
  18. Izumi, S., "Does output promote noticing and second language acquisition", TESOL Quarterly, 34, pp.239~278 (2000)
  19. 진승희, "A Study on the Effects of Dictogloss on English Writing in Korean Middle School", Studies in English Education, 18(2), pp.115~134 (2013), 글로벌영어교육학회
  20. Kim, Bu-Ja, "The Effects of Different Types of Form-Focused Instruction on Korean University Students' Writing Accuracy", 영어어문교육, 13(2), pp.63~90 (2007), 한국영어어문교육학회
  21. 김수진, "The Effects of Dictation and Dictogloss in the High School English Class: Focusing on English Collocation", 영어영문학21, 27(1), pp.259~278 (2014), 21세기영어영문학회
  22. Krashen, S., "Principles and practice in second language acquisition" (1982), Pergamon Press
  23. Krashen, S., "The natural approach" (1983), Pergamon
  24. LaPierre, D., "Language output in a cooperative learning setting: Determining its effects on second language learning", master, pp.1994
  25. Lee, S. K., "Visual input enhancement and grammar learning : A meta-analytic review", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, pp.307~331 (2008)
  26. Leeman, J., "Attention and awareness in foreign language learning", pp.217~258 (1995), University of Hawaii Press
  27. Long, M. H., "Does second language instruction make a difference? A review of research", TESOL Quarterly, 17(3), pp.359~382 (1983)
  28. Long, M. H., "Native speaker", non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input, 1983, pp.4(2), 126~141
  29. Long, M. H., "Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective", pp.39~52 (1991), John Benjamins
  30. Long, M. H., "Focus on formin classroomsecond language acquisition", pp.15~41 (1998), Cambridge University Press
  31. Lyster, R., "Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse", Studies in Second Language Aquisition, 20(1), pp.51~81 (1998)
  32. Mackey, A., "How do learners perceive interactional feedback?", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), pp.471~497 (2000)
  33. Mayo, M., "The effectiveness of two form-focused tasks in advanced EFL pedagogy", International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(2), pp.156~175 (2002)
  34. Murray, H., "Inside dictogloss-An investigation of a small group writing task", Bulletin suisse de linguistique, 60, pp.67~84 (1994)
  35. Nakamori, T., "Teaching relative clauses : How to handle a bitter lemon for Japaneses learners and English teachers", ELT Journal, 56(1), pp.29~40 (2002)
  36. Nassaji, H., "Form-focused instruction and teacher education", pp.7~16 (2007), Oxford University Press
  37. Oliver, R., "Negative feedback in child NS-NNS conversation", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(4), pp.459~481 (1995)
  38. Robinson, P., "Individual differences and the fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit adult second language learning", Language Learning, 47, pp.45~99 (1997)
  39. Sharwood Smith, M., "Speaking to many minds : On the relevance of different types of language information for the L2 learner", Second Language Research, 7(2), pp.118~132 (1991)
  40. Sharwood Smith, M., "Input enhancement in instructed SLA : Theoretical bases", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, pp.165~179 (1993)
  41. Swain, M., "Input in second language acquisition", pp.235~253 (1985), Newbury House
  42. Swain, M., "The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren't enough", The Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, pp.158~164 (1993)
  43. Swain, M., "Principle and practice in applied linguistics", pp.125~144 (1995), Oxford University Press
  44. Swain, M., "Bilingualism in education", pp.116~137 (1998), Longman
  45. Swain, M., "Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition", pp.64~81 (1998), Cambridge University Press
  46. VanPatten, B., "Input processing and second language acquisition : A role for instruction", The Modern Language Journal, 77(1), pp.45~57 (1993)
  47. VanPatten, B., "Explicit instruction and input processing", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, pp.225~243 (1993)
  48. VanPatten, B., "Explanation versus structured input in processing instruction", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(4), pp.495~510 (1996)
  49. VanPatten, B., "Second language acquisition theory and practice", pp.169~185 (1995), Erlbaum
  50. Wajnryb, R., "Grammar dictation" (1990), Oxford University Press
  51. White, J., "Focus on formin classroomsecond language acquisition", pp.85~113 (1998), Cambridge University Press
  52. Andrew White, "The Effectiveness of Repeating Dictogloss in Promoting New Vocabulary Noticing", 영어교육, 66(1), pp.65~90 (2011), 한국영어교육학회
  53. Williams, J., "Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition", pp.139~155 (1998), Cambridge University Press
  54. KyungheeYeo, "The Effects of Dictogloss:A Technique of ‘Focus on Form", 영어교육, 57(1), pp.149~167 (2002), 한국영어교육학회

관련 논문AI추천

Effects of Input Processing and Output-enriched Consciousness-raising Instruction on Learning Different Types of English Verb Forms김도윤, 정혜진팬코리아영어교육학회 · 영어교육연구2008 · 제20권 제3호입력 중심과 출력 중심 형태초점 접근법이 중학생 영어 문법 학습에 미치는 영향강혜정, 민찬규한국영어교과교육학회 · 영어교과교육2018 · 제17권 제1호출력 활동이 영어 관계대명사 학습에 미치는 영향박향숙언어과학회 · 언어과학연구2021 · 제96호Effects of form-focused-instruction timing and grammatical complexity on grammar learning조윤경, Shao, Yang언어과학회 · 언어과학연구2024 · 제108호The Differential Effects of Focus-on-form Instructions on EFL Learners` Grammar Learning.강동호팬코리아영어교육학회 · 영어교육연구2004 · 제16권 제1호Noticing and L2 Learning in the Output-based Focus-on-form강동호팬코리아영어교육학회 · 영어교육연구2011 · 제23권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)

공학적 설계와 과학 탐구 기반의 STEAM 교육 프로그램이 중학생의 과학, 수학, 기술에 대한 흥미, 자기효능감 및 진로 선택에 미치는 효과이영은, 이효녕pp. 513-540교육연극 기반 국어과 통합 수업 모형 개발이지은, 이성은pp. 541-560검인정 교과서의 선정 제도 개선을 위한 델파이 조사 연구이춘식pp. 561-578마이스터고와 특성화고 학생들의 직업가치관과 진로성숙도 비교 분석맹희주pp. 579-599중학교 체육수업에서 소외 여학생에 대한 하나로 수업 실천김낭규, 정영택pp. 601-623
원문 보기