본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

中國의 夫餘史 認識과 硏究現況 檢討

A Review of China’s Recognition and Research of the History of the Buyeo Kingdom

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Buyeo is the ancient and second oldest nation of Korea that was established and was followed by Gojoseon centering around the middle stream of the Songhua River in the 2nd century B.C. China has engaged in academic efforts to include the history of this area with their history of the Han Tribe since they recovered the Manchu region of China from Japan in 1945. Recently, they have attempted to complete this work through the Northeast Project. This study aims to investigate the facts and figures of their research on the history of the Buyeo Kingdom that has been made so far and how the Chinese people recognize Buyeo. Then, we will consider the research direction for Korea on Buyeo’s history. Research and exploration on the relics of Buyeo’s culture may be classified into three periods. The 1st period is from the time after the Manchu area was conquered by Japan until 1945 when Manchu was liberated. During this period, it was mainly elementary-level archeological researches that were conducted by Japanese scholars. The 2nd period is from 1945 (the year of independence) until the 1970s. In the period, relics of the Buyeo culture were found in the process of basic archeological researches being conducted on the entire area of Jilin Sheng as well as a few relics of the Buyeo culture were found in the process of exploring the relics of the Xituanshan Culture. The 3rd period begins in 1980s until the present. During this period, full-scale research and exploration were conducted on the relics of Buyeo culture based on the researches made in the previous periods. The relic sites of the Buyeo culture that were found reached about 70 places. Among them, excavation was made only in 9 places. In other relic sites, relics of the Buyeo culture were found through simple surface surveys. Reviewing the facts and figures of the researches on the Buyeo Kingdom conducted by China, about 80 theses have been reported so far and mainly in the 1980s and 1990s. Among them, there were 49 pure academic research theses and 32 survey reports on relics. Among the 49 research theses, 30 were based on literatures and 19 were the theses related to archeology. As for the history of Buyeo conducted by China according to the periods, it was in the 1930s that research on Buyeo was conducted for the first time. The initial research started from historical researches through the literature on the geographical location. From the 1950s to the 1970s, the Chinese Cultural Revolution proceeded full scale in society and most archeological researches on Jilin were focused on the Xituanshan Culture. Thus, there was scarce research on the history of Buyeo at that time. Beginning in the 1980s, research on the Buyeo Kingdom was remarkably advanced. Reaching he stage where comprehensive cultural understanding on the Xituanshan Culture was possible, researchers turned their interests gradually to the culture of Buyeo. Also, increases in archeological literature relating to Buyeo were actively made and the research became systematic and detailed. Since researches in that period were quoted with literary and archeological materials, all research was done systematically and comprehensively. The research on Buyeo conducted by China has different opinions according to the regions to which the researchers belong such as Liaoning Sheng, Jilin Sheng, Heilongjiang Sheng, etc. It is because they had different intentions to apply to Buyeo’s history for the benefit of the region to which they belong. To summarize the recognition of the Chinese on the history of the Buyeo Kingdom, Buyeo is a local regime that belonged to the Chungyen Kingdom that was established by a rival tribe in the ancient northeast area of China. Based on this recognition, all researches on the history of Buyeo have been currently made and such recognition was applied to all mass media and publications.

Abstract

Buyeo is the ancient and second oldest nation of Korea that was established and was followed by Gojoseon centering around the middle stream of the Songhua River in the 2nd century B.C. China has engaged in academic efforts to include the history of this area with their history of the Han Tribe since they recovered the Manchu region of China from Japan in 1945. Recently, they have attempted to complete this work through the Northeast Project. This study aims to investigate the facts and figures of their research on the history of the Buyeo Kingdom that has been made so far and how the Chinese people recognize Buyeo. Then, we will consider the research direction for Korea on Buyeo’s history. Research and exploration on the relics of Buyeo’s culture may be classified into three periods. The 1st period is from the time after the Manchu area was conquered by Japan until 1945 when Manchu was liberated. During this period, it was mainly elementary-level archeological researches that were conducted by Japanese scholars. The 2nd period is from 1945 (the year of independence) until the 1970s. In the period, relics of the Buyeo culture were found in the process of basic archeological researches being conducted on the entire area of Jilin Sheng as well as a few relics of the Buyeo culture were found in the process of exploring the relics of the Xituanshan Culture. The 3rd period begins in 1980s until the present. During this period, full-scale research and exploration were conducted on the relics of Buyeo culture based on the researches made in the previous periods. The relic sites of the Buyeo culture that were found reached about 70 places. Among them, excavation was made only in 9 places. In other relic sites, relics of the Buyeo culture were found through simple surface surveys. Reviewing the facts and figures of the researches on the Buyeo Kingdom conducted by China, about 80 theses have been reported so far and mainly in the 1980s and 1990s. Among them, there were 49 pure academic research theses and 32 survey reports on relics. Among the 49 research theses, 30 were based on literatures and 19 were the theses related to archeology. As for the history of Buyeo conducted by China according to the periods, it was in the 1930s that research on Buyeo was conducted for the first time. The initial research started from historical researches through the literature on the geographical location. From the 1950s to the 1970s, the Chinese Cultural Revolution proceeded full scale in society and most archeological researches on Jilin were focused on the Xituanshan Culture. Thus, there was scarce research on the history of Buyeo at that time. Beginning in the 1980s, research on the Buyeo Kingdom was remarkably advanced. Reaching he stage where comprehensive cultural understanding on the Xituanshan Culture was possible, researchers turned their interests gradually to the culture of Buyeo. Also, increases in archeological literature relating to Buyeo were actively made and the research became systematic and detailed. Since researches in that period were quoted with literary and archeological materials, all research was done systematically and comprehensively. The research on Buyeo conducted by China has different opinions according to the regions to which the researchers belong such as Liaoning Sheng, Jilin Sheng, Heilongjiang Sheng, etc. It is because they had different intentions to apply to Buyeo’s history for the benefit of the region to which they belong. To summarize the recognition of the Chinese on the history of the Buyeo Kingdom, Buyeo is a local regime that belonged to the Chungyen Kingdom that was established by a rival tribe in the ancient northeast area of China. Based on this recognition, all researches on the history of Buyeo have been currently made and such recognition was applied to all mass media and publications.

참고문헌 (106)

  1. 吉林大??史系考古, "吉林省?安德惠考古" (1985)
  2. 吉林省博物, "吉林江北土城子?址及石棺墓" (1957)
  3. 吉林市博物, "吉林永吉??古?山?址?掘" (1981)
  4. 吉林市博物, "吉林永吉??古?山?址?掘" (1981)
  5. 吉林市博物, "吉林永吉?屯大海猛?址"
  6. 吉林市博物, "吉林市帽?山?代木?墓" (1988)
  7. 吉林市博物, "吉林市泡子沿前山?址和墓葬" (1985)
  8. 唐音, "吉林市 山 魏 期及明代 址" (2003), 文物出版社
  9. 董?增, "吉林??山原始,?,古句?,渤海?文化?址??略" (1982)
  10. 董?增, "吉林蛟河?新街?福??古城考" (1989)
  11. 邵蔚, "吉林市山址局部" (2001)
  12. 松花江地?文管站, "松花江地?1981年文物普" (1983)
  13. 安文?, "春石碑?出土的???代?物" (1991)
  14. 劉景文, "吉林市郊帽?山古墓群" (1991), 文物出版社
  15. 劉景文, "吉林市帽?山古墓群" (1992), 文物出版社
  16. 劉景文, "吉林市帽 山墓地南山墓群" (2000), 文物出版社
  17. 劉振?, "永吉?屯?址?掘" (1973)
  18. 劉?宇, "?春市德惠?原始文化?址??述要" (1984)
  19. 劉?宇, "吉林省德惠王家?子北???的古代?存" (1985)
  20. 尹玉山, "吉林永吉?古?墓?理" (1985)
  21. 李文信, "李文信考古文集" (1992), 遼?人民出版社
  22. ?春市文物管理委, "?春市文物管理委?? 吉林省??河沿岸古文化?存????" (1986)
  23. 三林, "春近郊伊通河流域史前文化?跡???告" (1954)
  24. 王城?等, "吉林市??文物普?工作?行吉林市附近第一次文物普" (1956)
  25. 王城?, "吉林市附近??多?古代文化?址" (1957)
  26. 王雅周, "在?春伊通河畔的田野考古??" (1956)
  27. 王洪峰, "吉林市郊?帽?山?代墓地" (1994), 文物出版社
  28. 王洪峰, "吉林市帽 山夫余 址" (1997), 文物出版社
  29. 黑?江省文物考古?究所, "黑?江?????址?掘??" (1988)
  30. 고구려연구재단, "고조선 단군 부여" (2004), 고구려연구재단
  31. 孔??, "廣開土王陵碑의 ?夫余에 대한 고찰" (1990)
  32. 권태원, "夫餘社會와 文化圈", 7 (1999), 도산학술연구원
  33. 기수연, "後漢書 東夷列傳 <夫餘國傳> 분석", 문화사학, (21), pp.1101~1126 (2004), 한국문화사학회
  34. 金光洙, "부여의 ‘大使’?" (1992)
  35. 김도용, "下?에 대한 一考察" (1994)
  36. 김정배, "豆莫???究-부여사의 연결과 관련하여-" (1991)
  37. 김현숙, "延邊地域의 長城을 통해 본 高句麗의 東夫餘支配", 88 (2000)
  38. 金?正, "부여의 성립과 강역에 대한 一考察" (1992)
  39. 김현정, "부여 성립에 대한 일고찰" (1993), 상명사학회
  40. 盧重?, "東夫餘의 몇 가지 ??에 대하여" (1983)
  41. 盧泰敦, "夫餘國의 疆域 및 그 ??" (1989)
  42. 문창로, "부여의 왕과 제천의례", (10) (2003), 北岳史學會
  43. 朴京哲, "부여사 展?에 관한 再?? ??" (1992)
  44. 박경철, "부여사의 展?와 支配構造" (1994)
  45. 박경철, "부여 家의 支配構造 考察을 위한 一", 9 (1996)
  46. 박경철, "濊貊夫餘와 高句麗의 正體性에 關한 硏究", 고구려발해연구, (18), pp.497~532 (2004), 고구려발해학회
  47. 박경철, "부여사연구의 제문제, 동북아시아 선사 및 고대사연구의 방향" (2004), 학연문화사
  48. 박경철, "고조선 부여의 주민구성과 종족", (6) (2005), 고구려연구재단
  49. 박경철, "새로운 扶餘史像 定立을 위한 몇 가지 課題", 선사와 고대, (23), pp.173~190 (2005), 한국고대학회
  50. 朴洋震, "墓葬料의 社的 分析과 老河深 墓地의 一考察", 29 (1998)
  51. 박양진, "族 추정과 夫餘 및 卑 고고학자료의 비교분석", 39 (1998)
  52. 박양진, "考古學에서 본 夫餘", 한국고대사연구, (37), pp.55~79 (2005), 한국고대사학회
  53. 서길수, "부여유적지답사보고", (13) (2002), 고구려연구회
  54. 徐炳國, "東夷族과 夫餘의 역사" (2001), 도서출판 혜안
  55. 서영대, "夫餘族의 向方과 夫餘 繼承意識, 고대 동아시아에서 본 부여" (2004)
  56. 송기호, "扶餘史 연구의 쟁점과 자료 해석", 한국고대사연구, (37), pp.15~54 (2005), 한국고대사학회
  57. 宋晸, "한국사4-초기국가(고조선 부여 삼한)" (1997), 국사편찬위원회
  58. 송호정, "考古 料를 통해 본 夫餘의 기원과 그 성장과정, 한반도와 동북3성의 역사문화" (1999), 서울대출판부
  59. 송호정, "고조선 부여의 국가구조와 정치운영", 17 (2000), 한국고대사학회
  60. 송호정, "고대 부여의 지배구조와 사회구성", (10) (2003), 강좌 한국고대사
  61. 송호정, "부여의 국가형성 과정과 문화 기반", (6) (2005), 고구려연구재단
  62. 양인모, "기록으로 본 부여?고구려 신화 검토" (1984), 인하대학교문과대학
  63. ??錄, "부여의 ?迹과 ?物 民族文化의 ???" (1994)
  64. 江原, "中地域의 初期器文化-泡子沿式文化의 成立과 展", 3 (2000), 한국상고사학회
  65. 오륜경, "부여초기의 대고구려관계" (1994)
  66. 永, "楡樹 老河深遺蹟을 통해 본 夫餘社會" (1999), 서울대출판부
  67. 유명종, "부여?고구려의 신화전설", 14 (1972), 철학연구회
  68. 泰勇, "論衡』「吉」에 보이는 離國의 究", 57 (2000), 백산학회
  69. 윤내현, "부여의 분열과", 3(4) (1995), 상명대
  70. 尹乃, "夫余 家와 社性格", 49 (1997), 백산학회
  71. 이기동, "韓國民族史에서 본 夫餘", 한국고대사연구, (37), pp.5~13 (2005), 한국고대사학회
  72. 李基白, "夫餘의 투기죄" (1970), 단국대학교
  73. 李道?, "방위명 夫餘國의 成立에 관한 ??" (1991), 백산학회
  74. 이복규, "부여건국시조신화고" (1982)
  75. 이복규, "부여건국신화의 시대별인식양상", 87 (1995), 한국국어교육연구회
  76. 李洙, "길림성 중부지역 초기철기시대 문화유적 연구", 30 (2001), 백제문화연구소
  77. 이종수, "夫餘城郭의 特徵과 關防體系 硏究", (67) (2003), 백산학회
  78. 이종수, "부여문화연구" (2004)
  79. 이종수, "吉林市일대 夫餘城址와 關防體系" (2005), 백산자료원
  80. 이종수, "高句麗의 夫餘진출과정 연구", 21집 (2005)
  81. 이종수, "西溝 古墳群의 性格과 使用集團에 대하여", (77) (2007), 백산학회
  82. 정상석, "西山文化와 初期 夫餘" (1996), 大校士位文
  83. 최무장, "예맥과 서단산문화" (1992)
  84. "西?山文化之后??古代?存" (1993)
  85. 兆, "考古上看代夫余的社" (1995)
  86. "淡淡吉林龍潭山,??山一?的?代?物" (1987)
  87. "夫余文化的????" (1991)
  88. 德, "夫余前期 都的" (1995)
  89. "夫余王城新考-前期夫余王城的" (1983)
  90. "夫余原流辨析" (1984)
  91. "??吉林西?山文化?期?存" (1982)
  92. "夫余的疆域和王城" (1982)
  93. 李建才, "吉林市龍潭山山城考" (1995)
  94. 李建才, "再北夫余夫余夫余的" (1995), 吉林文史出版社
  95. 李建才, "三北夫余夫余夫余的", 三集 (2001), 吉林文史出版社
  96. 李殿福, "考古?上看?代?北地?的?族文化"
  97. 李鍾洙, "夫餘文化硏究" (2004)
  98. 林, "夫余史地再探" (1999)
  99. 林, "西型柄老河深彩嵐墓地的族" (1998), 中大百科全出版社
  100. 博泉, "北古代民族 考古 疆域" (1997), 吉林大出版社
  101. 博泉, "夫余的地理?境疆域" (1998)
  102. ?立明, "吉林泡子沿前山?址及其相???" (1986)
  103. ?忠培, "吉林市郊古代?址的文化類型" (1963)
  104. "?北古代夫余部的?衰及王城??" (1990)
  105. 王厚, "高句麗古城硏究" (2002), 文物出版社
  106. 王禹浪, "北夷“索 ” 及其夫余初期王城新考" (2002), 고구려연구회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)