文字資料를 통해서 본 中國과 三國의 書寫文化 교류
Exchanges of Transcription Culture between China and Three Countries through Letter Materials
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Naknang as an important link between the Old Joseon and Three Countries takes occupied very important position in the ancient history of Korea. When active documentary administration was conducted vigorously at Naknang region, the transcription culture including the use of Wooden tablets was expanded in the regions of Three Countries. It was considered that development of transcription culture was rapidly progressed with the maintenance of such a documentary administration. Since the 4th century, changes and developments of writing style was similar to that of Jungwon explains transcription culture of the Goguryeo reached the general level of the East Asia at that time. Baekje developed diplomacy biased to Namjo even until the 6th century and handwriting of the Namjo style was mainstream and writing style of inscription tended to increase the elements of Bukjo in the period of Sabi. It can be thought that cultural diversity of Baekje which developed multilateral diplomacies with neighboring countries was reflected in this transcription culture. On the contrary, Silla was continuously lagged behind Goguryeo and Baekje in the side of transcription culture due to political and geographical conditions. Silla under strong influence of Goguryeo showed a new writing style unlike the former one through the leading exchange with Nambukjo since the 6th century and it was 'Jeokseongbiche'. With this new writing style, it seemed that Silla secured self-development potential based on this transcription culture, developed the various diplomacies with Dang since the 7th century and had the initiative in the struggle period of Three Countries.
Abstract
Naknang as an important link between the Old Joseon and Three Countries takes occupied very important position in the ancient history of Korea. When active documentary administration was conducted vigorously at Naknang region, the transcription culture including the use of Wooden tablets was expanded in the regions of Three Countries. It was considered that development of transcription culture was rapidly progressed with the maintenance of such a documentary administration. Since the 4th century, changes and developments of writing style was similar to that of Jungwon explains transcription culture of the Goguryeo reached the general level of the East Asia at that time. Baekje developed diplomacy biased to Namjo even until the 6th century and handwriting of the Namjo style was mainstream and writing style of inscription tended to increase the elements of Bukjo in the period of Sabi. It can be thought that cultural diversity of Baekje which developed multilateral diplomacies with neighboring countries was reflected in this transcription culture. On the contrary, Silla was continuously lagged behind Goguryeo and Baekje in the side of transcription culture due to political and geographical conditions. Silla under strong influence of Goguryeo showed a new writing style unlike the former one through the leading exchange with Nambukjo since the 6th century and it was 'Jeokseongbiche'. With this new writing style, it seemed that Silla secured self-development potential based on this transcription culture, developed the various diplomacies with Dang since the 7th century and had the initiative in the struggle period of Three Countries.
참고문헌 (24)
- 국립중앙박물관, "낙랑" (2001)
- 朝鮮總督府, "古蹟調査特別報告-樂浪郡時代の遺蹟-", pp.234~244 (1927), 第四冊
- 高光儀, "5세기 高句麗 書藝의 特徵 硏究", 書藝學, 2 (2001), 韓國書藝學會
- "廣開土太王碑 高句麗 書寫文化의 특징-廣開土太王碑體와 石柱碑 樣式의 獨創性을 중심으로-, In 남·북·러국제학술회의-고조선·고구려·발해 발표 논문집", pp.305~306 (2005), 고구려연구재단
- 藤田亮策, "樂浪封泥攷, In 朝鮮考古學硏究", pp.364~367 (1948), 高桐書院
- 고광의, "高句麗 古墳壁畵에 나타난 書寫 관련 내용 검토", 한국고대사연구, 34, pp.225~266 (2004), 한국고대사학회
- 漢語大詞典編輯委員會, "漢語大詞典 第1卷", pp.706~ (1993), 漢語大詞典出版社
- 고광의, "高句麗 書體의 形態 演變 硏究" (2005), 고구려연구재단
- 梅原末治, "支那漢代紀年銘漆器圖說", 東京帝國大學文學部考古學資料叢刊第二冊, 53~54 (1943)
- 梅原末治, "漢三國六朝紀年鏡圖說", 5~7 (1942)
- 井內功, "朝鮮瓦塼圖報Ⅰ" (1976), 井內古文化硏究室
- 梅原末治, "朝鮮北部出土紀年塼集錄, In 支那學", pp.121~ (1933)
- 總督府, "樂浪帶方郡時代紀年銘塼集錄, In 昭和七年度古蹟調査報告" (1932)
- 井內功, "朝鮮瓦塼圖報 Ⅶ", pp.23~24 (1981)
- 國立淸州博物館, "韓國古代의 文字와 記號遺物", pp.52~53 (2000), 通天文化社
- 韓國古代社會硏究所, "譯註 韓國古代金石文 제1권", pp.168~ (1992)
- 李揆山, "武寧王陵의 副葬遺物2, In 百濟武寧王陵", pp.276~278 (1991), 百濟武寧王陵
- 國立淸州博物館, "韓國古代의 文字와 記號遺物", pp.64~ (2000), 通天文化社
- 國立扶餘博物館, "國立扶餘博物館", pp.177~ (1997), 三和出版社
- 국립창원문화재연구소, "韓國의 古代木簡", ~ (2004)
- 국립중앙박물관, "낙랑", pp.99~ (2001)
- 韓國古代社會硏究所, "譯註韓國古代金石文 제2권", pp.204~205 (1992)
- 국립청주박물관, "한국 고대의 문자와 기호유물", 93~94 (2000)
- 고광의, "5∼6세기 新羅 書藝에 나타난 외래 書風의 수용과 전개", 書藝學硏究, 4 (2004)
