≪洪武正韻譯訓≫의 俗音 표기와 관련된 몇 가지 문제
Several problems on the Sokeum transcription reflected in Hongmujeongunyeokhun
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
After the invention of Hunminjeongeum(訓民正音), King Sejong ordered a group of scholars, including Sin Suk-ju(申叔舟), to translate the Hongmujeongun(洪武正韻) into Korean. Translation and Annotation of the Hongmujeongun was completed in 1455, this book is Hong- mujeongunyeokhun(洪武正韻譯訓). In this book, the pronunciation devices in the Hongmujeongun were replaced by the Korean alphabet. And, in addition to the readings defined in the Hongmujeongun, i.e, the Jeongeum(正音, standard sound), the contemporary Mandarin readings were included under the name of Sokeum(俗音, popular sound). This paper aims to study the following problems about the Sokeum of Hong- mujeongunyeokhun. First, I will analyze a difference between Jeongeum and Sokeum in this book and be concerned with several problems about transcription. Secondly, I will scrutinize Chinese phonetic changes reflected in the fifteenth century published book. Finally, I am looking into the characteristics of the Chinese readings reflected in this books in connection with the motivation of publication.
Abstract
After the invention of Hunminjeongeum(訓民正音), King Sejong ordered a group of scholars, including Sin Suk-ju(申叔舟), to translate the Hongmujeongun(洪武正韻) into Korean. Translation and Annotation of the Hongmujeongun was completed in 1455, this book is Hong- mujeongunyeokhun(洪武正韻譯訓). In this book, the pronunciation devices in the Hongmujeongun were replaced by the Korean alphabet. And, in addition to the readings defined in the Hongmujeongun, i.e, the Jeongeum(正音, standard sound), the contemporary Mandarin readings were included under the name of Sokeum(俗音, popular sound). This paper aims to study the following problems about the Sokeum of Hong- mujeongunyeokhun. First, I will analyze a difference between Jeongeum and Sokeum in this book and be concerned with several problems about transcription. Secondly, I will scrutinize Chinese phonetic changes reflected in the fifteenth century published book. Finally, I am looking into the characteristics of the Chinese readings reflected in this books in connection with the motivation of publication.
참고문헌 (15)
- "飜譯朴通事", 慶北大學校 大學院 영인본, ~ (1959)
- "飜譯老乞大", 亞細亞文化社 영인본, ~ (1980)
- "洪武正韻譯訓", 高麗大學校出版部 영인본, ~ (1973)
- 허웅, "국어음운학" (1985), 샘문화사
- 姜信沆, "四聲通解硏究" (1973), 新雅社
- 金武林, "洪武正韻譯訓硏究" (1999), 도서출판 월인
- 李敦柱, "韓中漢字音硏究" (2003), 태학사
- 朴炳采, "洪武正韻譯訓의 新硏究" (1983), 고려대 민족문화연구소
- "四聲通解", 서울대학교 도서관 소장본, ~
- 신용권, "≪번역노걸대⋅박통사≫의 한어음 표기와 관련된 몇 가지 문제에 대하여", 언어학, (62), pp.35~67 (2012), 사단법인 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 신용권, "≪飜譯老乞大≫에 나타난 濁音과 入聲 표기에 대하여", 중국어문학, (54), pp.483~517 (2009), 영남중국어문학회[DOI]
- 신용권, "<번역노걸대․박통사>에 나타난 정속음의 개념에 대한 재검토", 한글, (293), pp.83~115 (2011), 한글학회
- 愼鏞權, "≪古今韻會擧要≫硏究", 博士, pp.2002
- 王力, "漢語史稿(修訂本)" (1980), 中華書局
- 張衛東, "≪華音正俗變異≫考", 國際中國學硏究, 3 (2000)