본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

『홍무정운역훈』의 문백이독 연구

Oral and Literary Readings of 『Hongmujeongun Yokhun』

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

In China, discussions about literary and colloquial readings in Chinese dialects have been made since the 20th century, but in Korea, they had already started being investigated five centuries ago during the Chosun dynasty. When King Sejong and the scholars who were in the Jiphyeonjeon created Hunminjeongeum and intended to immediately publish 『Hongmujeongun Yokhun』, they realized that there were two different kinds of pronunciations for the Chinese characters: One was a set of colloquial pronunciations while the other was a set of literary ones. Therefore, King Sejong and the scholars recorded literary pronunciations (correct sounds) as the method for communication with literary persons. At the same time, through active communication with commoners in Yanjing (now Beijing), they also collected baihuayin (popular pronunciations, 白話音). Since the Hongwu Emperor (明太祖) suggested the standard pronunciations for literary reading by publishing 『Hongmujeongun Yokhun』in 1373, the literati of those days were required to master the literary pronunciations. Therefore, whenever Shin Suk-ju, who was inexperienced at using the literary pronunciations, visited Huang Chan of the Hanlim Academy, Shin was always accompanied by a translator. Also, when he greeted a Chinese envoy, he attended the meeting accompanied by a translator and asked about the literary pronunciations of 『Hongmujeongun』. 『Hongmujeongun Yokhun』is valued highly in that it was the first work that recorded the literary and colloquial readings in the Yanjing area (now Beijing) in the 15th century. Even more important, 『Hongmujeongun Yokhun』was a great work which realistically showed the cultural phenomenon that colloquial and literary sounds co-existed. In fact, Shin Suk-ju spared no effort to collect accurate pronunciations to the point of visiting Huang Chan in Yodong thirteen times. He also inquired into the literary pronunciations when he met scholars who had studied abroad in China. Moreover, he visited Yanjing seven or eight times and collected or recorded colloquial pronunciations which were commonly used among the various people. Finally, he played a pivotal role in compiling 『Hongmujeongun Yokhun』. Therefore, the value of 『Hongmujeongun Yokhun』should be reconsidered, since it faithfully reflects the phenomenon of two different readings which existed in the 15th century.

Abstract

In China, discussions about literary and colloquial readings in Chinese dialects have been made since the 20th century, but in Korea, they had already started being investigated five centuries ago during the Chosun dynasty. When King Sejong and the scholars who were in the Jiphyeonjeon created Hunminjeongeum and intended to immediately publish 『Hongmujeongun Yokhun』, they realized that there were two different kinds of pronunciations for the Chinese characters: One was a set of colloquial pronunciations while the other was a set of literary ones. Therefore, King Sejong and the scholars recorded literary pronunciations (correct sounds) as the method for communication with literary persons. At the same time, through active communication with commoners in Yanjing (now Beijing), they also collected baihuayin (popular pronunciations, 白話音). Since the Hongwu Emperor (明太祖) suggested the standard pronunciations for literary reading by publishing 『Hongmujeongun Yokhun』in 1373, the literati of those days were required to master the literary pronunciations. Therefore, whenever Shin Suk-ju, who was inexperienced at using the literary pronunciations, visited Huang Chan of the Hanlim Academy, Shin was always accompanied by a translator. Also, when he greeted a Chinese envoy, he attended the meeting accompanied by a translator and asked about the literary pronunciations of 『Hongmujeongun』. 『Hongmujeongun Yokhun』is valued highly in that it was the first work that recorded the literary and colloquial readings in the Yanjing area (now Beijing) in the 15th century. Even more important, 『Hongmujeongun Yokhun』was a great work which realistically showed the cultural phenomenon that colloquial and literary sounds co-existed. In fact, Shin Suk-ju spared no effort to collect accurate pronunciations to the point of visiting Huang Chan in Yodong thirteen times. He also inquired into the literary pronunciations when he met scholars who had studied abroad in China. Moreover, he visited Yanjing seven or eight times and collected or recorded colloquial pronunciations which were commonly used among the various people. Finally, he played a pivotal role in compiling 『Hongmujeongun Yokhun』. Therefore, the value of 『Hongmujeongun Yokhun』should be reconsidered, since it faithfully reflects the phenomenon of two different readings which existed in the 15th century.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 강신항, "한국의 운서" (2000), 태학사
  2. 강신항, "韓漢音韻史硏究" (2003), 태학사
  3. 강신항, "훈민정음연구" (2003), 성균관대학교출판부
  4. 김무림, "홍무정운역훈" (2006), 신구문화사
  5. 박현규, "홍무정운의 제본에 대한 조사연구", 한문학논집, 8 (1990), 단국한문학회
  6. 배은한, "洪武正韻, 中州音韻 所反映全濁上聲字的演變類型", 중국어문논역학회, (10) (2002), 중국어문논역총간
  7. 배은한, "홍무정 판본이급 사통해 지분계", 중국언어연구, (20), pp.435~469 (2005), 한국중국언어학회
  8. 심소희, "『洪武正韻⋅序』를 통한 正音觀 고찰", 중국언어연구, (35), pp.45~65 (2011), 한국중국언어학회
  9. 이영월, "『사성통해』를 통한 조기궁화 연구", 박사, 중어중문학, pp.2004
  10. 이은봉, "중국고대사상의 원형을 찾아서" (2003), 소나무
  11. 이재돈, "' 사성통해 ' 에 반영된 16세기 중국어 음계연구", 중국어문학지, 1, pp.215~251 (1994), 중국어문학회
  12. 이종구, "『洪武正韻』과 『西儒耳目資』의 관계 및 音韻變化", 중어중문학, 33, pp.103~118 (2003), 한국중어중문학회
  13. 정경일, "한국운서의 이해" (2002), 아카넷
  14. 주성일, "≪四聲通解≫凡例考(Ⅰ)", 중국문학연구, 38, pp.115~150 (2009), 한국중문학회
  15. 주성일, "≪四聲通解≫凡例考(Ⅱ)", 중국문학연구, 39, pp.215~246 (2009), 한국중문학회
  16. 주성일, "《四聲通解》에 반영된 近代漢語 陰聲韻의 변화", 중국문학연구, 45, pp.355~379 (2011), 한국중문학회
  17. 河惠丁, "朝鮮朝 韻書의 獨自性 硏究", 박사, 서지학, pp.1997
  18. 唐作藩, "音韻學敎程" (1993), 北京大學出版社
  19. 濮之珍, "中國語言學史" (1997), 上海古籍出版社
  20. 宋廉등, "洪武正韻" (1973), 亞細亞文化史
  21. 汪壽明, "歷代漢語音韻學文選" (1986), 上海古籍出版社
  22. 殷南根著, "오행의 새로운 이해" (2000), 법인문화사
  23. 張昇余, "日本唐音與明淸官話的硏究" (1998), 興界圖書出版公司
  24. 丁鋒, "日漢琉漢對音與明淸官話音硏究" (2008), 中華書局
  25. 甯忌浮, "洪武正韻硏究" (2003), 上海辭書出版社
  26. 甯忌浮, "漢語韻書史" (2009), 上海人民出版社
  27. 羅常培, ""論龍果夫的八思巴字和古官話"", 中國語文 (1959)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (25건)