영어의 주어-조동사 도치규칙에 대한 최소주의적 고찰
A Minimalist Analysis of Subject-Auxiliary Inversion in English
1
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Abstract
It has been one of the big puzzles in English syntax that the SAI (Subject Auxiliary Inversion) is obligatory in the matrix clause of non-subject Wh-question but that it is prohibited in the subject Wh-question. This subject/object asymmetry is no longer viable in the subordinate clause of questions. Specifically the SAI is disallowed in both positions of indirect Wh-questions and in indirect Y/N questions. This generalization, however, does not apply to the other SAI constructions; the SAI is found both in the matrix and the embedded clauses of negative inversion sentences. For this puzzle and a unified account of the rule itself, we suggest firstly, that the SAI in English is an independent but a uniform rule, secondly, that it is a focus movement and triggered by a focus feature in T which was inherited from C.
참고문헌 (24)
- 김광섭, "T에서 C로의 이동에 대한 최소주의적 분석", 14(3), pp.329~347 (2004)
- 김용하, "C-T 상속과 한국어 어미 체계. 제6차 한국 생성문법 학술대회 발표" (2006), 서울: 성신여자대학교
- 김혜리, "고대영어 종속절의 화제화에 대하여", 영어학연구, (20), pp.49~72 (2005), 한국영어학학회
- 서진희, "주어-조동사 도치에 관한 소고", (6), pp.143~157 (2000)
- 조남호, "조동사 DO의 기원", 영어학연구, 16, pp.161~188 (2003), 한국영어학학회
- 홍성심, "영어의 non-DP 주어의 구조적 위치", 6(2), pp.1~14 (2002)
- Adger, D.,, "Peripheries: Syntactic Edges and their Effects" (2004), Dordrecht: Kluwer
- Belletti, A, "Inversion” as Focalization.", pp.60~90 (2001), New York: Oxford University Press
- Chomsky, N, "The Minimalist Program. Cambridge" (1995), Mass.: The MIT Press.
- Chomsky, N, "Minimalist inquiries", pp.89~156 (2000), Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
- Chomsky, N, "Derivation by Phase", pp.1~52 (2001), Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
- Chomsky, N, "Beyond explanatory adequacy. Cambridge", 20, pp.1~28 (2001)
- Chomsky, N, "Three Factors in Language Design", 36, pp.1~22 (2005)
- Goldberg, E. A. a, "Subject-auxiliary inversion: A natural category", 22, pp.411~428 (2005)
- Haegeman, L., "English Grammar: a generative perspective" (1999), Oxford, UK.: Blackwell
- McClosky, J, "Subjecthood and subject position", pp.197~235 (1997), Dordrecht: Kluwer
- Miyagawa, S, "Against Optional Scrambling", 28(1), pp.1~25 (1997)
- Pesetsky, D, "T-to-C movement: causes and consequences", pp.293~338 (2001), Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
- Pollock, J-Y, "Notes on clause structure", pp.237~279 (1997), Dordrecht: Kluwer
- Puskas, G, "Focus and the CP domain", pp.145~164 (1997), Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman
- Radford, A, "English Syntax. Cambridge" (2004), UK.: Cambridge University Press
- Richards, N, "What moves where in which language? Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass" (1997)
- Rizzi, L. 1997, "The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery", pp.281~337 (1997), Dordrecht: Kluwar
- Suh, J-H, "Pre-IP Structure in Korean", 162(2), pp.365~379