한국어 ‘-것’의 통사범주와 범주 자질
On the Nature of Syntactic Category of Korean ‘-kes’ and Its Categorial Features
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper, based on Han (2013), attempts to analyze ‘-kes’ in Korean Internally Headed Relative Clauses in Jhang (1994) and argues that Korean ‘-kes’ would not be an expletive but a nominal Complementizer. ‘-Kes’ in IHRC has been argued to be an expletive (Yoon, 2005). However, the current study provides three arguments against Yoon, within X-bar syntax. First, the parameters of Korean and English assure the consistency when ‘-kes’ is on of CP. Secondly, in terms of the configuration of the data, Korean ‘-kes’ is a Head so it would not occupy Specifier position of TP, whereas the English expletives are maximal projections so it is positioned at Spec-TP. The last piece of evidence is that the sentence ending with ‘-kes’ can be used as a sentence fragment. Likewise, in English, a clause introduced by the complementizer ‘if’ can also be used as an answer but a clause (TP) missing the complementizer cannot. In this respect, ‘-kes’ occupies the Head position of CP. The theoretical implication of this study, then, is that in Korean there might not be an expletive, unlike what Yoon(2005) has argued for, and that it is best to maintain that Korean ‘-kes’ in some of the constructions under investigation is of a category type C with a nominal feature within the Minimalism (Chomsky 1995, Adger 2003).
Abstract
This paper, based on Han (2013), attempts to analyze ‘-kes’ in Korean Internally Headed Relative Clauses in Jhang (1994) and argues that Korean ‘-kes’ would not be an expletive but a nominal Complementizer. ‘-Kes’ in IHRC has been argued to be an expletive (Yoon, 2005). However, the current study provides three arguments against Yoon, within X-bar syntax. First, the parameters of Korean and English assure the consistency when ‘-kes’ is on of CP. Secondly, in terms of the configuration of the data, Korean ‘-kes’ is a Head so it would not occupy Specifier position of TP, whereas the English expletives are maximal projections so it is positioned at Spec-TP. The last piece of evidence is that the sentence ending with ‘-kes’ can be used as a sentence fragment. Likewise, in English, a clause introduced by the complementizer ‘if’ can also be used as an answer but a clause (TP) missing the complementizer cannot. In this respect, ‘-kes’ occupies the Head position of CP. The theoretical implication of this study, then, is that in Korean there might not be an expletive, unlike what Yoon(2005) has argued for, and that it is best to maintain that Korean ‘-kes’ in some of the constructions under investigation is of a category type C with a nominal feature within the Minimalism (Chomsky 1995, Adger 2003).
참고문헌 (25)
- 김양순, "영어통사론 이해" (2004), 아진출판사
- 김연승, "현대영어 통사론강의" (2001), 경진문화사
- 한진희, "허사 There 구문에 대한 연구", 박사, 영어영문학과 영어학전공, pp.2013
- 홍성심, "영어의 비명사구 주어구문", 언어연구, 20(1), pp.205~222 (2004), 한국현대언어학회
- 김양순, "최소주의 이론: 자질,병합,이동" (2012), 동인
- Adger, D., "Core Syntax: A Minimalist Approach" (2003), Oxford University Press
- Adger, D., "Features in Minimalist syntax. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism" (2010), Oxford University Press
- 최현숙, "On the Categorial Ambiguity of the Morpheme kes in Korean", 어학연구, 43(2), pp.229~264 (2007), 언어교육원
- Chomsky, N., "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris
- Chomsky, N, "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework, Step by Step" (2000), MIT Press
- Gelderen, E. van, "Where did Late Merge go? Grammaticalization as feature Economy", Studia Linguistica, 62, pp.287~300 (2008)
- Hong, S., "On Subjectless constructions. ms. Presented at Korea Generative Grammar Circle" (2007), Kongju National University
- 홍성심, "Sentential Subjects, Subjectless constructions, and Phasehood", 생성문법연구, 19(3), pp.373~391 (2009), 한국생성문법학회
- Hong, S., "Korean Pseudo-cleft constructions and Reconstruction Puzzle" (2009), presented at University of Maryland
- Jhang, S. E., "Headed nominalizations in Korean", 박사, pp.1994
- Li, Y., "X: A Theory of Morphology-syntax interace" (2005), MIT Press
- Nam, Ki-Shim, "Modern Korean syntax" (2005), Taehaksa Publishing House
- Radford, A., "Minimalist Syntax: exploring the structure of English" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Radford, A., "Minimalist syntax: Exploring the structure of English" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Radford, A., "Analysing English Sentences: A Minimalist Approach" (2009), Cambridge University Press
- Ransom, E. N, "The grammaticalization of complementizers", Berkeley Linguistics Society, 14, pp.364~374 (1988)
- Yi, Eek-Seop, "Kwuke mwunpeoplon kanguy (Lectures on Korean Grammar)" (1999), Hakyeonsa
- 윤항진, "한국어 허사", 생성문법연구, 15(3), pp.385~396 (2005), 한국생성문법학회
- 윤항진, "Different Types of Kes Constructions in Korean", 생성문법연구, 22(3), pp.557~577 (2012), 한국생성문법학회