Korean IHRC Has a Gap
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
A typical property of relative clauses is that they have a gap. However, the Internally Headed Relative Clause (IHRC) appears to have no gap. This study argues that the IHRC has a gap, but it is not easily noticeable because it is generated in a Caseless position. The main claim of this article is that the IHRC is a free relative clause with a Caseless argument raised. Implicit arguments are not overtly realized, because they cannot be assigned Case. Recently, Cecchetto and Donati (2012) and Chomsky (2013) propose that a dislocated constituent can be the label in the landing site. If this is the case, the implicit argument can be assigned Case in a landing site. This studies claims that the Korean IHRC is a case in point. It is a free relative clause in which an implicit argument becomes the head in the landing site, and so it can be assigned Case, and consequently can be overtly realized as kes.
Abstract
A typical property of relative clauses is that they have a gap. However, the Internally Headed Relative Clause (IHRC) appears to have no gap. This study argues that the IHRC has a gap, but it is not easily noticeable because it is generated in a Caseless position. The main claim of this article is that the IHRC is a free relative clause with a Caseless argument raised. Implicit arguments are not overtly realized, because they cannot be assigned Case. Recently, Cecchetto and Donati (2012) and Chomsky (2013) propose that a dislocated constituent can be the label in the landing site. If this is the case, the implicit argument can be assigned Case in a landing site. This studies claims that the Korean IHRC is a case in point. It is a free relative clause in which an implicit argument becomes the head in the landing site, and so it can be assigned Case, and consequently can be overtly realized as kes.
참고문헌 (43)
- Basilico, D., "Head position and internally headed relative clauses", Language, 72, pp.498~532 (1996)
- Bonneau, J., "The structure of internally headed relative clauses", Ph.d, pp.1992
- Cecchetto, C., "On labeling: Principle C and head movement", Syntax, 13, pp.241~278 (2011)
- Cecchetto, C., "Relabeling heads: A unified account for relativization structures", Linguistic Inquiry, 42, pp.519~560 (2012)
- Cho, S., "Three forms of Case Agreement in Korean", Ph.d, pp.2000
- Choe, H., "Syntactic adjunction, A-chain and the ECP: multiple identical case construction in Korean", NELS, 17, pp.100~120 (1987)
- Chomsky, N., "Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vernaud", pp.133~166 (2008), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Problems of projections", Lingua, 130, pp.33~49 (2013)
- Chomsky, N., "Structures, strategies, and beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti", pp.1~16 (2015), Benjamins Publishing Company
- Chung, C., "Differences between externally and internally headed relative clauses", The Proceedings of the 9 th International Conference on HPSG, pp.43~65 (2003)
- Cole, P., "The structure of internally headed relative clauses", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 5, pp.277~302 (1987)
- Donati, C., "Wh-movement moving on", pp.21~46 (2006), MIT Press
- Gorbet, L., "Headless relatives in the Southwest: Are they related?", Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 3, pp.270~278 (1977)
- Grosu, A., "The status of the internally-headed relatives of Japanese", Korean within the typology of definite relatives, 2010, pp.19, 231~274
- Grosu, A., "A quantificational disclosure approach to Japanese and Korean internally headed relatives", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 21, pp.159~196 (2012)
- Grosu, A., "Strange relatives of the third kind", Natural Language Semantics, 6, pp.125~170 (1998)
- Higginbotham, J., "The logic of perceptual reports: an extensional alternative to situation semantics", Journal of Philosophy, 80, pp.100~127 (1983)
- Hoshi, K., "Structural and interpretive aspects of head-internal and head-external relative clauses", Ph.d, pp.1995
- Jhang, S., "Headed nominalizations in Korean: relative clauses, clefts, and comparatives", Ph.d, pp.1994
- 조미정, "The Correlation Between Syntactic Nominalization and the Internally Headed Relative Constructions in Korean", 생성문법연구, 13(4), pp.535~ (2003), 한국생성문법학회
- Kim, J., "On the Mixed Properties of Pseudo Relative Clauses", Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Korean Linguistics, pp.83~93 (1998)
- Kim, K., "Argument structure of the Inalienable Possession Construction", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, X, pp.465~478 (2004)
- Kim, M., "Event Structure and the internally-headed relative clause construction in Korean and Japanese", Ph.d, pp.2004
- Kim, M., "Formal linking and internally headed relative clauses", Natural language semantics, 15, pp.279~315 (2007)
- 김민주, "Relevance of Grammar and Pragmaticsto the Relevancy Condition", 어학연구, 44(1), pp.95~120 (2008), 언어교육원
- Kim, M., "E-type anaphora and three types of kes-construction", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 27, pp.345~377 (2009)
- Kim, N., "The grammar of Korean complementation" (1984), University of Hawaii at Manoa: Center for Korean Studies
- Kim, Y., "Relevancy in internally-headed relative clauses in Korean", Lingua, 112, pp.541~559 (2002)
- Kuroda, S., "Pivot-Dependent relativization in Japanese III: Types of Japanese relatives", Papers in Japanese Linguistics, 5, pp.157~179 (1976)
- Kuroda, S., "Japanese syntax and semantics" (1992), Kluwer Academic
- Lee, C., "Issues in East Asian Language Acquisition" (2001), Kurosio Publishers
- Lee, J., "The Korean internally-headed relative clause construction: its morphological, syntactic and semantic aspects", Ph.d, pp.2006
- Lee, M., "Focus-Deduced constraints in head-internal relatives", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, X, pp.568~581 (2004)
- Parsons, T., "Events in the semantics of English: a study in subatomic semantic" (1990), MIT Press
- Shimoyama, J., "Internally headed relative clauses in Japanese and E-type anaphora", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 8, pp.147~182 (1999)
- Sim, C., "Two types of multiple accusative constructions in Korean Inalienable possession type and set relation type", NELS, 34, pp.541~553 (2004)
- Tomioka, S., "Event Structure of the Inalienable Possession in Korean", Proceedings of the 28 th Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium, pp.279~292 (2005)
- Watanabe, A., "MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 2" (1992)
- Watanabe, A., "WH and operator constructions in Japanese", Lingua, 113, pp.519~558 (2003)
- Watanabe, A., "Parameterization of quantificational determiners and head-internal relatives", Language and Linguistics, 5, pp.59~97 (2004)
- Yoon, J., "Different Semantics for Different syntax: Relative Clauses in Korean", OSUWPL, 42, pp.199~226 (1993)
- Yoon, J. H., "Theta theory and the grammar of inalienable possession constructions", NELS, 20, pp.502~516 (1990)
- Yoon, J. H., "The grammar of inalienable possession constructions in Korean", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 3, pp.357~368 (1989)