v*P, 과연 국면인가?
Is v*P really a Phase?
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper concerns Chomsky’s(2005b) conception of phases under which CP and v*P fall out as phase. Chomsky's definition needs an ad hoc stipulation of EF-spreading for the EPP-effect with regard to the phase locality condition to account for the cases of raising and ECM constructions. However, it comes to light that the stipulation produces some serious problems against Chomsky’s(2001, 2004, 2005a, 2005b) minimalist assumptions. Therefore, as an alternative to the stipulation of EF-spreading, I propose the ‘tensed-T condition’ in this paper. Under the ‘tensed-T condition’, v*P may be identified as a phase only in case that it is selected by a tensed-T. Consequently, v*P is a relativized phase, not an inherent phase like CP.
Abstract
This paper concerns Chomsky’s(2005b) conception of phases under which CP and v*P fall out as phase. Chomsky's definition needs an ad hoc stipulation of EF-spreading for the EPP-effect with regard to the phase locality condition to account for the cases of raising and ECM constructions. However, it comes to light that the stipulation produces some serious problems against Chomsky’s(2001, 2004, 2005a, 2005b) minimalist assumptions. Therefore, as an alternative to the stipulation of EF-spreading, I propose the ‘tensed-T condition’ in this paper. Under the ‘tensed-T condition’, v*P may be identified as a phase only in case that it is selected by a tensed-T. Consequently, v*P is a relativized phase, not an inherent phase like CP.
참고문헌 (23)
- 김용석, "A Probe-Goal Approach to the EPP-Effect of Wh-Interrogatives in English and Korean", 현대문법연구, 46 (2006), 현대문법학회
- 김용석, "영어의 섬효과에 관한 탐침자-목표물 이론적 접근", 현대영미어문학, 24(4), pp.123~144 (2006), 현대영미어문학회
- 김용석, "최소주의 언어학의 이해" (2006), 한성대학교 출판
- 김용석, "최소주의 언어학의 탐구" (2007), 한성대학교 출판부
- Chomsky, N., "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Derivation by Phase in: A Life in Language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Beyond Explanatory Adequacy", Structures and Beyond - The Cartography of Syntactic Structure, 3, pp.104~131 (2004), Oxford University Press
- Chomsky, N., "Factors in the Design of Language", Linguistic Inquiry, 36, pp.1~22 (2005)
- Chomsky, N., "On Phases" (2005), MIT
- Chomsky, N, "Approaching UG from below" (2006), MIT
- Collins, C., "Local Economy", Linguistic Inquiry Monograph, 29 (1997), MIT Press
- Hale, K., "On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Semantic Relations", View from Building, 20 (2003), MIT Press
- Hiraiwa, K., "Dimension of Symmetry in Syntax: Some Remarks on the Evolution of Linguistic Theory", 박사, pp.2005
- Holmberg, A., "Word Order and Syntactic Features in the Scandinavian Languages and English", 박사, pp.1986
- Holmberg, A., "Remarks on Holmberg's Generalization", Studia Linguistica, 53, pp.59~74 (1999)
- Holmberg, A., "Linearization in Two Ways", Theoretical Linguistics, 31, pp.147~157 (2005)
- Holmberg, A., "Agreement and Movement in Icelandic Raising Constructions", Ligua, 113, pp.997~1019 (2003)
- Huang, C.-T. J., "Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar", 박사, pp.1982
- Jonas, D., "Clause Structure Expletives and Verb Movement" (1994), Harvard University
- Kayne, R., "The Antisymmetry of Syntax" (1994), MIT Press
- Lasnik, H., "Minimalist Analysis" (1999), MIT Press
- Lasnik, H., "A Course in GB Syntax: Lectures on Binding and Empty Categories" (1988), MIT Press
- Svenonius, P., "On the Edge" (2003), University