T 없는 통사론을 향하여
Toward a Syntax without T
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper doubts the existence of the tense-category T along the line of Kim's(2010a, 2010b) assumption of lexical categorization. I show that the adoption of T-category to the syntactic description of natural languages gives rise to a variety of undesirable imperfections within the grammatical systems like Chomsky's(2001, 2004, 2005a, 2005b) Probe-Goal Framework, and argue that the imperfections and the empirical problems attributed to them, including three troublesome mysteries, can be completely solved under the framework of so-called 'Syntax without T-Category,' which is proposed in this paper. It also comes to light in this paper that CP is only the cyclic phase for the computation of narrow syntax, and vP conjugated with v*P is nothing but a sematic unit of 'proposition' rather than cyclic phase, under which claim all the problematic issues ascribed to the conception of strong phase v*P automatically disappear.
Abstract
This paper doubts the existence of the tense-category T along the line of Kim's(2010a, 2010b) assumption of lexical categorization. I show that the adoption of T-category to the syntactic description of natural languages gives rise to a variety of undesirable imperfections within the grammatical systems like Chomsky's(2001, 2004, 2005a, 2005b) Probe-Goal Framework, and argue that the imperfections and the empirical problems attributed to them, including three troublesome mysteries, can be completely solved under the framework of so-called 'Syntax without T-Category,' which is proposed in this paper. It also comes to light in this paper that CP is only the cyclic phase for the computation of narrow syntax, and vP conjugated with v*P is nothing but a sematic unit of 'proposition' rather than cyclic phase, under which claim all the problematic issues ascribed to the conception of strong phase v*P automatically disappear.
참고문헌 (22)
- 김용석, "v*P, 과연 국면인가?", 영어학연구, (27), pp.23~39 (2009), 한국영어학학회
- 김용석, "언어의 실체에 관한 새로운 도전:『최강 최소주의 이론』", 현대문법연구, (62), pp.87~109 (2010), 현대문법학회
- 김용석, "‘칸트주의 언어학’의 모색, in 생성문법과 인접학문", 2010 추계 한국생성문법학회, 2010, ~
- Bayer, J., "COMP in Bavarian Syntax", The Linguistic Review, 3, pp.209~274 (1983)
- Chomsky, N., "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Ken Hale: A Life in Language, In Ken Hale: A Life in Language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Beyond Explanatory Adequacy" (2004)
- Chomsky, N., "Three Factors in the Design of Language", Linguistic Inquiry, 36, pp.1~22 (2005)
- Chomsky, N., "On Phases", 석사, pp.2005
- Chomsky, N., "Approaching UG from below", 석사, pp.2006
- Darwin, C., "The Origin of Species (6th ed.)" (1872), Modern Library
- Haegeman, L., "Die and dat in West-Flemixh Relative Clauses", Linguistics in the Netherlands, pp.83~91 (1983)
- Holmberg, A., "Word Order and Syntactic Features in the Scandinavian Languages and English", 박사, pp.1986
- Kant, I., "Kritik der Urteilskraft, In Herausgegeben von Karl Vorländer(Der Philosophische Bibliothek Band 39)" (1924)
- Kayne, R., "The Antisymmetry of Syntax" (1994), MIT Press
- Hale, K, "On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations, In The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger" (1993), MIT Press
- McCloskey, J., "Transformational Syntax and Model Theoretic Semantics" (1979), Reidel Dordrecht
- Pesetsky, D., "Paths and Categories", 박사, pp.1982
- Pollock, J.-Y., "Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP", Linguistic Inquiry, 20, pp.365~424 (1989)
- Saussure, F., "Cours de Linguistique Générale" (1916)
- Svenonius, P, "On the Edge", 석사, pp.2003
- Wallace, A.R., "Darwinism" (1989), MacMillan and Co