Not all CPs Are Phases!
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Since the inception of phase theory (Chomsky 2000), there has been considerable debate over the exact nature of phases. Chomsky (2000, et seq.) proposes that unaccusative and passive vPs are not phases. On the other hand, Legate (2003) argues that unaccusative and passive vPs are also (strong) phases (see also Sauerland 2003). However, Legate (2012) suggests that v is not a phase when it does not assign case. Although there is no consensus on the phasehood of v, researchers seem to agree that every (finite) CP is a phase. This is based on a variety of empirical data showing that elements moving across a clause boundary land in Spec,CP en route to their surface position. However, in this paper, I will argue that not all CPs are phases, using Korean Exceptional Case Marking (ECM) construction, and Fox and Pesetsky’s (2005) Cyclic Linearization.
Abstract
Since the inception of phase theory (Chomsky 2000), there has been considerable debate over the exact nature of phases. Chomsky (2000, et seq.) proposes that unaccusative and passive vPs are not phases. On the other hand, Legate (2003) argues that unaccusative and passive vPs are also (strong) phases (see also Sauerland 2003). However, Legate (2012) suggests that v is not a phase when it does not assign case. Although there is no consensus on the phasehood of v, researchers seem to agree that every (finite) CP is a phase. This is based on a variety of empirical data showing that elements moving across a clause boundary land in Spec,CP en route to their surface position. However, in this paper, I will argue that not all CPs are phases, using Korean Exceptional Case Marking (ECM) construction, and Fox and Pesetsky’s (2005) Cyclic Linearization.
참고문헌 (29)
- Abels, Klaus, "Successive Cyclicity, Anti-locality, and Adposition Stranding", Doctoral, pp.2003
- Aelbrecht, Lobke, "Preposition doubling in Flemish and its consequences for the syntax of Dutch PPs", Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 16, pp.33~68 (2013)
- Bošković, Željko, "Now I am a Phase, Now I’m Not a Phase: On the Variability of Phases with Extraction and Ellipsis", Linguistic Inquiry, 45, pp.27~89 (2014)
- Chomsky, Noam, "Step by step: Essays on minimalism in honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
- Chomsky, Noam, "Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud", pp.133~166 (2008), MIT Press
- Fowlie, Meaghan, "Generative Linguistics in the Old Word (GLOW) 31: Principles of linearisation" (2010), de Gruyter
- Fox, Danny, "Cyclic Linearization of Syntactic Structure", Theoretical linguistics: Object Shift, 31, pp.1~46 (2005)
- Funakoshi, Kenshi, "On Headless XP Movement", Ellipsis, pp.43, 519~562
- Harwood, William, "Being progressive is just a phase: celebrating the uniqueness of progressive aspect under a phase-based analysis", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 33, pp.523~573 (2015)
- Multiple Agree and the defective intervention constraint in Japanese, "Hiraiwa, Ken", MITWPL, 67~80, pp.MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 40 (2001)
- Hiraiwa, Ken, "Scrambling to the Edge", Syntax, 13, pp.133~164 (2010)
- Hong, Ki-Sun, "Grammatical Relations: A Cross-linguistic Perspective", pp.215~225 (1990), CSLI Publications
- Hong, Ki-Sun, "Subject-to-object raising constructions in English and Korean", Language Research, 33, pp.409~434 (1997)
- Hong, Soo-min, "“Exceptional” Case-Marking and Resultative Construction", Doctoral, pp.2005
- Hong, Sungshim, "A note on ‘Raising to Object’ in small clauses and full clauses", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 19, pp.275~289 (2010)
- in the Overt Syntax, "Natural Language and Linguistic Theory", 2005, 867~916
- Ko, Heejeong, "Syntactic Edges and Linearization", Doctoral, pp.2005
- Ko, Heejeong, "Asymmetries in Scrambling and Cyclic Linearization", Linguistic Inquiry, 38, pp.49~83 (2007)
- Koopman, Hilda, "Mapping spatial PPs: the cartography of syntactic structures 6", pp.26~73 (2010), OUP
- Legate, Julie, "Some Interface Properties of the Phase", Linguistic Inquiry, 34, pp.506~516 (2003)
- Legate, Julie, "Phases:Developing the framework", pp.233~250 (2012), Mouton de Gruyter
- Park, Dongwoo, "VP as an ellipsis site in Korean: Evidence for the derivational PF deletion theory", Proceedings of North East Linguistic Society, 46, pp.109~122 (2016), Graduate Linguistic Student Association
- Park, Dongwoo, "When does ellipsis occur, and what is elided?", Doctoral, pp.2017
- Quicoli, A. Carlos, "Anaphora by Phase", Syntax, 11, pp.299~329 (2008)
- Sauerland, Uli, "Intermediate Adjunction with A-Movement", Linguistic Inquiry, 34, pp.308~314 (2003)
- Takahashi, Masahiko, "Case, phases, and nominative", accusative conversion in Japanese, 2010, pp.19, 319~355
- Takano, Yuji, "Illicit Remnant Movement : An argument for Feature-Driven Movement", Linguistic Inquiry, 31, pp.141~156 (2000)
- Yoon, James Hye-suk, "Raising of major arguments in Korean and Japanese", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25, pp.615~653 (2007)
- Yoshida, Masaya, "The syntax of Why-Stripping", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 33, pp.323~370 (2015)