崔溥≪漂海录≫在朝鲜时代的流传与接受-以汉文资料为中心-
Spread and acceptance of Cui Pu's Piaohailu(≪漂海录≫)in Joseon Dynasty: focused on materials written in Chiniese
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Cui Pu(崔溥)'s Piaohailu(≪漂海錄≫) was published at least six times in Joseon Dynasty. The book had a large number of readers. From Chengzong(成宗)—the king of Joseon, court ministers to ordinary scholars, many readers left different kinds of poetry and article materials about quoting, commenting on or just referring to Piaohailu, which provides us an important basis to study the acceptance of Cui Pu’s Piaohailu in Joseon Dynasty. On the basis of these materials, this paper discusses the acceptance of Piaohailu from four aspects: First, Joseon’s king Chengzong viewed Cui Pu’s experience of drift incident and his Piaohailu from the standpoint of winning glory for the country(華國).Second, the pragmatists paid attention to the knowledge and practicability of Piaohailu, and used it as a reference for compiling practical works. Thirdly, Zhao Zongzhu(趙宗著) and other scholars of Joseon Dynasty compared Cui Pu's preferential treatment in Ming Dynasty with Lin Yinguan(林寅觀)'s unfair treatment in Joseon. It reflects their thought of recompenses to Ming Dynasty. Fourthly, Nan Jiuwan(南九萬) and Jin Lvwan(金履萬)’s acceptance of Piaohailu combined with Cui Pu's experience after his returning to Joseon. Their poems showed their regret for Cui Pu's involvement in the Wuwu scholars’ calamity(戊午士禍). Additionally,the recipient shows the author's attitude towards the dispute about Ming Jiao(名教) triggered by the event of Cui Pu’s writing Piaohailu.
Abstract
Cui Pu(崔溥)'s Piaohailu(≪漂海錄≫) was published at least six times in Joseon Dynasty. The book had a large number of readers. From Chengzong(成宗)—the king of Joseon, court ministers to ordinary scholars, many readers left different kinds of poetry and article materials about quoting, commenting on or just referring to Piaohailu, which provides us an important basis to study the acceptance of Cui Pu’s Piaohailu in Joseon Dynasty. On the basis of these materials, this paper discusses the acceptance of Piaohailu from four aspects: First, Joseon’s king Chengzong viewed Cui Pu’s experience of drift incident and his Piaohailu from the standpoint of winning glory for the country(華國).Second, the pragmatists paid attention to the knowledge and practicability of Piaohailu, and used it as a reference for compiling practical works. Thirdly, Zhao Zongzhu(趙宗著) and other scholars of Joseon Dynasty compared Cui Pu's preferential treatment in Ming Dynasty with Lin Yinguan(林寅觀)'s unfair treatment in Joseon. It reflects their thought of recompenses to Ming Dynasty. Fourthly, Nan Jiuwan(南九萬) and Jin Lvwan(金履萬)’s acceptance of Piaohailu combined with Cui Pu's experience after his returning to Joseon. Their poems showed their regret for Cui Pu's involvement in the Wuwu scholars’ calamity(戊午士禍). Additionally,the recipient shows the author's attitude towards the dispute about Ming Jiao(名教) triggered by the event of Cui Pu’s writing Piaohailu.
참고문헌 (11)
- 심경호, "조선시대의 한문학과 시경론" (1999), 일지사
- 이지영, "최부 ≪표해록≫ 언해본의 이본 고찰", 국어국문학, (178), pp.5~33 (2017), 국어국문학회[DOI]
- 유춘동, "새 자료 서강대 소장, 최부(崔溥)의 『금남표해록』 한글본 연구", 열상고전연구, (53), pp.299~321 (2016), 열상고전연구회[DOI]
- 정민, "16·7세기 조선 문인지식인층의 江南熱과 西湖圖", 고전문학연구, 22, pp.10~306 (2002), 한국고전문학회
- 朴元熇, "崔溥<漂海录>校注" (2014), 上海书店出版社
- 朴元熇, "崔溥<漂海录>分析研究" (2014), 上海书店出版社
- 朴羲成, "紀年便考" (1996), 韩国学中央研究院
- 葛荣晋, "韩国实学思想史" (2002), 首都师范大学出版社
- 杨雨蕾, "明清时期朝鲜朝天、燕行路线及其变迁", 历史地理, 21 (2006)
