본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Why와 How come의 통사적 차이에 관한 연구

A Study on the Syntactic Differences of Why and How come

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

In this paper we propose that how come is not a head C, but a maximal projection (MP) occupying CP-Spec and that differences of why and how come result from the difference in the base-generated position of the two wh-phrases. Under the framework of the articulated CP structure, it is suggested that why is base-generated in RP-Spec and moves to IntP-Spec, while how come is based-generated in IntP-Spec without any movement. This paper has shown that all the syntactic differences of why and how come are naturally accounted for by the difference in merge position of the two wh-phrases even though both of them are MPs occupying IntP-Spec. Finally, we propose that the lack of SAI in how come questions can be accounted for by considering how how come was generated. Since, how come is derived by verb movement into C in the early modern English period, the generation of how come already includes the process of SAI, making it not necessary any more.

Abstract

In this paper we propose that how come is not a head C, but a maximal projection (MP) occupying CP-Spec and that differences of why and how come result from the difference in the base-generated position of the two wh-phrases. Under the framework of the articulated CP structure, it is suggested that why is base-generated in RP-Spec and moves to IntP-Spec, while how come is based-generated in IntP-Spec without any movement. This paper has shown that all the syntactic differences of why and how come are naturally accounted for by the difference in merge position of the two wh-phrases even though both of them are MPs occupying IntP-Spec. Finally, we propose that the lack of SAI in how come questions can be accounted for by considering how how come was generated. Since, how come is derived by verb movement into C in the early modern English period, the generation of how come already includes the process of SAI, making it not necessary any more.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 김연승, "의문사 'why’의 병합위치와 이동분석", 생성문법연구, 23(4), pp.823~843 (2013), 한국생성문법학회
  2. 김연승, "영어의 다중슬루싱에 관한 연구", 언어연구, 31(4), pp.841~861 (2016), 한국현대언어학회
  3. Adger, D., "Core Syntax: A Minimalist Approach" (2003), Oxford University Press
  4. Aoun, J., "WH-elements in Situ: Syntax or LF?", Linguistic Inquiry, 24, pp.199~238 (1993)
  5. Baker, C. L, "Notes on the Description of English Questions: The Role of an Abstract Question Morpheme", Foundations of Language, 6, pp.197~219 (1970)
  6. 최영식, "Locality in So Called Sluicing in Korean: Null Argument and Beyond", 언어연구, 31(2), pp.497~518 (2015), 한국현대언어학회[DOI]
  7. Why and How come. In Papers on Wh-movement, "Collins, C.", MIT, 31~45, pp.MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 15 (1991)
  8. in the Overt Syntax, "NLLT", 2005, 867~916
  9. Lasnik. H., "When Can You Save a Structure by Destroying It?", Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, 31, pp.301~320 (2001)
  10. Lasnik, H., "Multiple Sluicing in English?", Syntax, 17, pp.1~20 (2014)
  11. Merchant, J., "The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands, and the Theory of Ellipsis" (2001), Oxford University Press
  12. Merchant, J, "Sluicing", pp.271~291 (2007), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax
  13. Ochi, M, "How come and Other Adjunct Wh-phrases: A Cross-linguistic Perspective", Language and Linguistics, 5, pp.29~57 (2004)
  14. Quirk, R., "A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language" (1985), Longman
  15. Radford, A., "Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English" (1997), Cambridge University Press
  16. Radford, A., "Syntax: A Minimalist Introduction" (1997), Cambridge University Press
  17. Reinhart, T, "Wh-in Situ in the Framework of the Minimalist Program", Natural Language Semantics, 6, pp.29~56 (1998)
  18. Rizzi, L., "Elements of Grammar: A Handbook of Generative Syntax", pp.281~337 (1997), Kluwer
  19. Rizzi, L., "Current Studies in Italian Syntax: Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi", pp.267~296 (2001), Elsevier
  20. Rizzi, L, "The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 3", pp.223~251 (2004), Oxford University Press
  21. On Some Properties of Criterial Freezing In Studies in Linguistics, "Rizzi, L", MIT, 145~158, pp.CISCL Working Papers on Language and Cognition 1 (2007)
  22. Shlonsky, U., "Where’s ‘Why’?", Linguistic Inquiry, 42, pp.651~669 (2011)
  23. Stepanov, A., "Cartography and Licensing of Wh-adjuncts: A Cross-linguistic Perspective", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 26, pp.589~638 (2008)
  24. Tsai, W. -T. Dylan, "On Nominal Islands and LF Extraction in Chinese", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 12, pp.121~175 (1994)
  25. Watanabe, A, "The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory", pp.203~225 (2001), Blackwell
  26. Yoshida, M., "The Routledge Handbook of Syntax", pp.192~213 (2014), Routledge
  27. Yoshida, M., "The Syntax of Why-Stripping", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 33, pp.323~370 (2015)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)