Why Does Way 'Why' in Korean Lack Quantificational Variability?
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, I discuss why way ‘why,' unlike other wh-words in Korean, lacks quantificational variability and is used only as an interrogative. Based on the observation that the Q-force of wh-words in Korean changed from interrogative to indeterminate (C.-M. Suh 1987, etc.), I recast the question why way is used only as an interrogative as why way failed to undergo this change in the Q-force of wh-words. My claim is that the Q-force of wh-words in Korean changed from interrogative to indeterminate as the result of a series of historical changes that took place in Korean wh-constructions but that way failed to undergo this change due to its unique structural position as a CP adjunct (Ko 2005). I also show how the explanation I propose for way can shed light on the fact that reason wh-words, cross-linguistically, lack quantificational variability.
Abstract
In this paper, I discuss why way ‘why,' unlike other wh-words in Korean, lacks quantificational variability and is used only as an interrogative. Based on the observation that the Q-force of wh-words in Korean changed from interrogative to indeterminate (C.-M. Suh 1987, etc.), I recast the question why way is used only as an interrogative as why way failed to undergo this change in the Q-force of wh-words. My claim is that the Q-force of wh-words in Korean changed from interrogative to indeterminate as the result of a series of historical changes that took place in Korean wh-constructions but that way failed to undergo this change due to its unique structural position as a CP adjunct (Ko 2005). I also show how the explanation I propose for way can shed light on the fact that reason wh-words, cross-linguistically, lack quantificational variability.
참고문헌 (31)
- Bo?covi?,Z, "Sometimes in SpecCP, sometimes in-situ. In R. Martin, D. Michael and J. Uriagereka, eds., Step by Step" (2000), MIT Press
- Cheng,L, "On the typology of WH-questions", 박사, pp.1991
- Chung,D, "On the representation of Q and Q-dependencies", 박사, pp.1996
- Diesing, M, "The syntactic roots of semantic partition", 박사, pp.1990
- Haspelmath,M, "Indefinite pronouns" (1997), Oxford University Press
- Heim,I, "The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases", 박사, pp.1982
- Hong,S.-H, "Aspects of the syntax of WH-questions in English and Korean", 박사, pp.2005
- Hopper, P, "Grammaticalization" (1993), Cambridge University Press
- Huang,C-T,J, "Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar", 박사, pp.1982
- Jang,Y.-J, "Two types of question and existential quantification", Linguistics, 37(5), pp.847~869 (1999)
- Kim,C.-H, "A study on interrogative and indefinite pronouns in Korean (in Korean)", 박사, pp.1992
- Kim,M.-H, "The development of Korean interrogatives as discourse markers (in Korean)", Discourse and Cognition, 12(2), pp.41~62 (2005)
- Kim,S.-W, "Chain scope and quantification structure", 박사, pp.1991
- in the overt syntax, "Natural Language & Linguistic Theory", 2005, 867~916
- Kuroda, S.-Y, "Generative grammatical studies in Japanese language", 박사, pp.1965
- Lee, S.-W, "On the indefinite use of "WH+(i)+nka" (in Korean)", Korean Linguistics, 36, pp.191~219 (2000)
- Li,Y.-H.A, "Indefinite WH in Mandarin Chinese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 1, pp.125~155 (1992)
- Lin,J.-W, "The syntax of zenmeyang 'how' and weishenme 'why' in Mandarin Chinese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 1, pp.293~331 (1992)
- Nishigauchi,T, "Quantification in syntax", 박사, pp.1986
- Reinhart,T, "Interface strategies.OTS Working Papers", ~ (1995)
- Rizzi,L, "Relativized minimality" (1990), MIT Press
- Rizzi,L, "On the position of "int(errogative)" in the left periphery of the clause, Ms, Universita di Siena", ~ (1999)
- Suh,C.-M, "Study of Questions in Korean (in Korean)" (1987), Thap Publishing Co
- Suh,C.-S, "Interrogatives and indefinite words in Korean: with reference to Japanese", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 3 (1989)
- Suh,C.-S, "A study of Korean grammar (in Korean)" (1990), Hankwukmwunhwasa
- Tsai,W.-T, "On economizing the theory of A-bar dependencies", 박사, pp.1994
- Yang,I.-S, "Semantics of delimiters", Language Research, 9(2), pp.84~121 (1973)
- Yoon,J.-M, "Unified clausal approach to wh-constructions in Korean revisited: An analysis based on reanalysis", Studies in Generative Grammar, 14(1), pp.3~39 (2004)
- Yoon,J.-M, "Two historical changes in wh-constructions in Korean and their implications", Studies in Generative Grammar, 15(4), pp.457~488 (2005)
- Yoon,J.-M, "Selective island effects in Korean wh-constructions: A diachronic approach", Korean Journal of Linguistics, 31(2), pp.165~204 (2006)
- Yoon,J.-M, "Syntax of wh-constructions and Q-particles in Korean: an analysis based on the unified clausal approach and reanalysis, Ms, Myongji University", ~ (2007)