의문사 'why’의 병합위치와 이동분석
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to find out the syntactic structure where some syntactic peculiarities of interrogative why can be uniformly accounted for. Within the left periphery merge theory that why is base-generated in the left periphery of a clause, there are two options. One is the non-movement analysis that why never moves in the complementizer layer. The other is the movement analysis that why moves within the complementizer layer(i.e., from RP-Spec to IntP-Spec). On the basis of some pieces of empirical evidence, I have tried to illustrate that the movement analysis is more adequate than the non-movement analysis. I have shown that we cannot but adopt the movement analysis to uniformly account for the interaction of why with a quantifier or a focus operator, and some peculiar characteristics of why in multiple wh-questions.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to find out the syntactic structure where some syntactic peculiarities of interrogative why can be uniformly accounted for. Within the left periphery merge theory that why is base-generated in the left periphery of a clause, there are two options. One is the non-movement analysis that why never moves in the complementizer layer. The other is the movement analysis that why moves within the complementizer layer(i.e., from RP-Spec to IntP-Spec). On the basis of some pieces of empirical evidence, I have tried to illustrate that the movement analysis is more adequate than the non-movement analysis. I have shown that we cannot but adopt the movement analysis to uniformly account for the interaction of why with a quantifier or a focus operator, and some peculiar characteristics of why in multiple wh-questions.
참고문헌 (21)
- Aoun, J., "WH-elements in situ: Syntax or LF?", Linguistic Inquiry, 24, pp.199~238 (1993)
- Baker, C. L., "Notes on the description of English questions: The role of an abstract question morpheme", Foundations of Language, 6, pp.197~219 (1970)
- Chomsky, N., "Minimalist inquiries, In Step by step: Essays on minimalism in honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Derivation by phase, In Ken Hale: A life in language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- Why and how come, In Papers on wh-movement, "Collins, C.", MIT, 31~45, pp.MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 15 (1991)
- Hornstein, N., "Logical form" (1995), Blackwell
- Kim, Yeon-Seung, "Wh-Agree vs. wh-licensing", Studies in Generative Grammar, 11, pp.97~150 (2001)
- in the overt syntax, "Natural Language and Linguistic Theory", 2005, 867~916
- Lin, J.-W., "The syntax of zenmeyang 'how' and weishenme 'why' in Mandarin Chinese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 1, pp.293~331 (1992)
- Quirk, R., "A comprehensive grammar of the English language" (1985), Longman
- Reinhart, T., "Wh-in situ in the framework of the Minimalist Program", Natural Language Semantics, 6, pp.29~56 (1998)
- Rizzi, L., "Relativized minimality" (1990), MIT Press
- Rizzi, L., "The fine structure of the left periphery, In Elements of grammar: A handbook of generative syntax", pp.281~337 (1997), Kluwer
- Rizzi, L., "On the position "int(errogative)" in the left periphery of the clause, In Current studies in Italian syntax: Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi", pp.267~296 (2001), Elsevier
- Rizzi, L., "Locality and left periphery, In The cartography of syntactic structures, Vol. 3, Structures and beyond", pp.223~251 (2004), Oxford University Press
- Shlonsky, U., "Where's 'why'?", Linguistic Inquiry, 42, pp.651~669 (2011)
- Stepanov, A., "Cartography and licensing of wh-adjuncts: A cross-linguistic perspective", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 26, pp.589~638 (2008)
- Thornton, R., "Why continuity", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 26, pp.107~146 (2008)
- Tsai, W.-T. Dylan, "On nominal islands and LF extraction in Chinese", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 12, pp.121~175 (1994)
- Tsai, W.-T. Dylan, "Left periphery and how-why alternations", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 17, pp.83~115 (2008)
- Watanabe, A., "Wh-in-situ languages, In The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory", pp.203~225 (2001), Blackwell