본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

라우드 대 프리슬리(Lowth vs. Priestley): 문법과 용법에 대한 18세기의 태도

Lowth vs. Priestley: Eighteenth-Century Attitudes Toward English Grammar and Usage

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

The 18th century was a crucial period in the process of codification and standardization of English and in the chronicling of the traditional English grammar. The need for grammar to provide linguistic guidance to the upper social classes, and to those who aspired to belong to them, led to a sharp increase in the publication of grammar texts. Representative grammar books published in this period were J. Priestley’s Rudiments of English Grammar (1761 & 1768) and R. Lowth’s Study of Short Introduction to the English Grammar (1762). Priestley's and Lowth's grammars epitomized, respectively, the two main trends of grammatical tradition: descriptivism and prescriptivism. This paper, through a contextual reading of Priestley’s grammars, reexamines both the nature of his grammar and discusses possible sources for his norm of propriety or correctness in his grammars, arguing that such a characterization of both Priestley’s work and that of his contemporaries is misleading and, moreover, that Priestley is also one of the main codifiers of the English language and had a profound influence on the standardization of English in the latter part of the 18th century.

Abstract

The 18th century was a crucial period in the process of codification and standardization of English and in the chronicling of the traditional English grammar. The need for grammar to provide linguistic guidance to the upper social classes, and to those who aspired to belong to them, led to a sharp increase in the publication of grammar texts. Representative grammar books published in this period were J. Priestley’s Rudiments of English Grammar (1761 & 1768) and R. Lowth’s Study of Short Introduction to the English Grammar (1762). Priestley's and Lowth's grammars epitomized, respectively, the two main trends of grammatical tradition: descriptivism and prescriptivism. This paper, through a contextual reading of Priestley’s grammars, reexamines both the nature of his grammar and discusses possible sources for his norm of propriety or correctness in his grammars, arguing that such a characterization of both Priestley’s work and that of his contemporaries is misleading and, moreover, that Priestley is also one of the main codifiers of the English language and had a profound influence on the standardization of English in the latter part of the 18th century.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. 황인태, "규범론자로서의 Samuel Johnson 읽기", 영어학연구, 16(1), pp.55~74 (2010), 한국영어학학회[DOI]
  2. 황인태, "J. Priestley 영문법서(1768)와 그 의의", 언어연구, 31(4), pp.1027~1046 (2016), 한국현대언어학회[DOI]
  3. 황인태, "라우드(R. Lowth) 영문법서(1762)와 그 지위", 인문학연구, 56(1), pp.299~322 (2017), 인문과학연구소
  4. Ash, John, "The Easiest Introduction to Dr. Lowth’s English Grammar", printed for E. and C. Dilly
  5. Auer, Anita, "Grammars, Grammarians and Grammar-Writing in Eighteenth-Century England", pp.57~75 (2008), Mouton de Gruyter
  6. Azad, Y., "The Government of Tongues: Common Usage and the ‘Prescriptive’ Tradition 1650 to 1800", PhD, pp.1989
  7. Bartha, P., "By Parallel Reasoning: The Construction and Evaluation of Analogical Arguments" (2010), Oxford University Press
  8. Battistella, E., "Bad language: Are some words better than others?" (2005), Oxford University Press
  9. Baugh, A. C., "A History of the English Language" (2002), Prentice Hall
  10. Cameron, D., "Verbal Hygiene" (2012), Routledge
  11. Chapman, D., "The Eighteenth-century Grammarians as Language Experts", pp.21~36 (2008), Mouton de Gruyter
  12. Crowley, T., "Standard English and the Politics of Language" (2003), Routledge
  13. Finegan, E., "Cambridge History of the English Language 4", pp.536~588 (1998), Cambridge University Press
  14. Harris, R., "Course of Lectures on the Theory of Language & Universal Grammar", pp.5~11 (1993), Routledge
  15. Johnson, S., "Eighteenth-Century E-Texts"
  16. Johnson, S., "A Dictionary of the English Language: in which the words are deduced from their originals", F. & C. Rivington
  17. Labov, W., "The Social Stratification of English in New York City" (1966), Center for Applied Linguistics
  18. Leonard, S. A., "Doctrine of Correctness in English Usage, 1700-1800" (1962), Russell & Russell
  19. Locher, M. A., "Standards and Norms in the English Language", pp.127~147 (2008), Mouton de Gruyter
  20. Lowth, R., "A Short Introduction to English Grammar, with Critical Notes", A. Millar and R. & J. Dodsley
  21. McEvoy, J. G., "Joseph Priestley, ‘Aerial Philosopher’ Part 1", Ambix: the Journal of the Society for the Study of Alchemy and Early Chemistry, 25 (1978)
  22. Millward, C. M., "A Biography of the English Language" (2011), Cengage Learning
  23. Mitchell, L. C., "Grammar Wars: Language as Cultural Battlefield in 17th and 18th Century England" (2001), Ashgate
  24. Mugglestone, L., "“Talking Proper.” Grammar Wars: The Rise of Accent as Social Symbol" (2003), Oxford Univ. Press
  25. Priestley, J., "The Rudiments of English Grammar", R. Griffiths
  26. Priestley, J., "A Course of Lectures on the Theory of Language, and Universal Grammar", Printed by W. Eyres
  27. Priestley, J., "The Rudiments of English Grammar, Adapted to the Use of Schools", T. Becket
  28. Priestley, J., "A Course of Lectures on Oratory and Criticism"
  29. Saussure, F. D., "Course on General Linguistics" (1916), Fontana
  30. Schofield. R. E., "The Enlightenment of Joseph Priestley: A Study of his Life and Work from 1733 to 1773" (1997), Penn State Press
  31. Smith, O., "The Politics of Language 1791-1819" (1986), Clarendon
  32. Swift, J., "A Proposal for Correcting, Improving and Ascertaining the English Tongue", printed for Benj. Tooke
  33. Trask, R. L., "Key Concepts in Language and Linguistics" (1999), Routledge
  34. Vorlat, E., "The Development of English Grammatical Theory" (1975), University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)