본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Against the Vacuous Movement Hypothesis

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

The goal of this paper is to prove that the Vacuous Movement Hypothesis (VMH) is not acceptable. Many scholars have claimed for the VMH to account for some phenomena concerning subject-object asymmetries, that-trace effects, and parasitic gap constructions. This paper illustrates that the VMH is problematic in both conceptual and empirical grounds. A new analysis is suggested in order to account for all the examples provided for the VMH. This paper assumes that an interrogative C has an edge feature requiring its specifier to be filled by a wh-phrase or an empty operator. Since the Superiority Condition works among the constituents of the relevant kind and overt wh-phrases and empty operators are different in kind, either one can be attracted by an edge feature. It implies that an interrogative subject can remain in-situ if another constituent can move to CP-Spec, attracted by the edge feature of C. If there is only one wh-phrase for occupying CP-Spec, the wh-phrase has to move to CP-Spec for the satisfaction of the edge feature whether it is a subject or a non-subject.

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to prove that the Vacuous Movement Hypothesis (VMH) is not acceptable. Many scholars have claimed for the VMH to account for some phenomena concerning subject-object asymmetries, that-trace effects, and parasitic gap constructions. This paper illustrates that the VMH is problematic in both conceptual and empirical grounds. A new analysis is suggested in order to account for all the examples provided for the VMH. This paper assumes that an interrogative C has an edge feature requiring its specifier to be filled by a wh-phrase or an empty operator. Since the Superiority Condition works among the constituents of the relevant kind and overt wh-phrases and empty operators are different in kind, either one can be attracted by an edge feature. It implies that an interrogative subject can remain in-situ if another constituent can move to CP-Spec, attracted by the edge feature of C. If there is only one wh-phrase for occupying CP-Spec, the wh-phrase has to move to CP-Spec for the satisfaction of the edge feature whether it is a subject or a non-subject.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. Boškoviċ, Ž., "The Syntax of Nonfinite Complementation: An Economy Approach" (1997), MIT Press
  2. Brillman, R. J., "An anti-locality account of English subject", non-subject asymmetries, MIT, 2016
  3. Browning, M. A., "CP recursion and that-t effects", Linguistic Inquiry, 27(2), pp.237~255 (1996)
  4. Chomsky, N., "Barriers" (1986), MIT Press
  5. Some notes on economy of derivation and representation, "Chomsky, N.", 43~74, pp.MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 10 (1989)
  6. Chomsky, N., "Ken Hale: A Life in Language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
  7. Chomsky, N., "Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. vol. 3", pp.104~131 (2004), Oxford University Press
  8. Chomsky, N., "Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory", pp.132~166 (2008), MIT Press
  9. Chung, S., "On the interpretation of certain island facts in GPSG", Linguistic Inquiry, 14(4), pp.704~713 (1983)
  10. Culicover, P. W., "Evidence against ECP accounts of the that-t effect", Linguistic Inquiry, 24(3), pp.557~561 (1993)
  11. Doherty, C., "Clauses without complementizers: Finite IP complementation in English", The Linguistic Review, 14, pp.197~220 (1997)
  12. Douglas, J., "Unifying the that-trace and anti-that-trace effects", Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 2(1), pp.1~28 (2017)
  13. Engdahl, E., "Parasitic gaps", Linguistics and Philosophy, 6(1), pp.5~34 (1983)
  14. Why the null complementizer is special in complementizer-trace effects, "Erlewine, M.", 371~380, pp.MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 80 (2017)
  15. Fox, D., "Cyclic linearization of syntactic structure", Theoretical Linguistics, 31(1), pp.1~45 (2005)
  16. George, L., "Analogical Generalization in Natural Language Syntax", Doctor, pp.1980
  17. Grohmann, K. K., "Linguistic Minimalism", pp.260~290 (2011), Oxford University Press
  18. Henry, A., "Belfast English and Standard English" (1995), Oxford University Press
  19. Ishii, T., "The phase impenetrability condition, the vacuous movement hypothesis, and that-trace effects", Lingua, 114, pp.183~215 (2004)
  20. 김연승, "Against Anti-Locality in A’-Movement", 영어학, 23, pp.713~731 (2023), 한국영어학회[DOI]
  21. McCloskey, J., "Quantifier float and wh-movement in an Irish English", Linguistic Inquiry, 31(1), pp.57~84 (2000)
  22. Nissenbaum, J., "Investigations of Covert Phrase Movement", Doctor, pp.2000
  23. Pesetsky, D., "The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax", pp.1~34 (2017), John Wiley and Sons Inc
  24. Pesetsky, D., "Ken Hale: A life in language", pp.355~426 (2001), MIT Press
  25. Radford. A., "An Introduction to English Sentence Structure" (2009), Cambridge University Press
  26. Rizzi, L., "Elements of Grammar", pp.289~330 (1997), Kluwer

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)