본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Can We Call Zhu Xi's Notion of Xin Mind? The Neo-Confucian Way of Understanding the Philosophy of Mind

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

It is widely accepted that the Neo-Confucian idea of xin is translated as the English term, 'heart-mind.' However, the English translation recalls to us the Cartesian framework of mind-body dualism. By using the comparative way of thinking via a conceptual difference, we are able not only to grasp a proper usage of the terms, but also to deepen our understanding of different philosophical traditions. Therefore, rather than investigating alternative terms to the English translation, I will examine whether or not the translation is appropriate by examining some key concepts related to xin in the neo-Confucian philosophical context. Through my argument, we can see that Zhu Xi's philosophical concerns do not explain the ontological relationship between the mental and the physical, but elucidate how to unify the distinction between the moral disposition and life per se. Furthermore, we will understand that the neo-Confucian philosophy of mind truly focuses on philosophical-anthropological questions like "how should humans live?" and "why should humans be moral?"

Abstract

It is widely accepted that the Neo-Confucian idea of xin is translated as the English term, 'heart-mind.' However, the English translation recalls to us the Cartesian framework of mind-body dualism. By using the comparative way of thinking via a conceptual difference, we are able not only to grasp a proper usage of the terms, but also to deepen our understanding of different philosophical traditions. Therefore, rather than investigating alternative terms to the English translation, I will examine whether or not the translation is appropriate by examining some key concepts related to xin in the neo-Confucian philosophical context. Through my argument, we can see that Zhu Xi's philosophical concerns do not explain the ontological relationship between the mental and the physical, but elucidate how to unify the distinction between the moral disposition and life per se. Furthermore, we will understand that the neo-Confucian philosophy of mind truly focuses on philosophical-anthropological questions like "how should humans live?" and "why should humans be moral?"

참고문헌 (18)

  1. Ames, Roger T., "Daodejing, “Making This Life Significant” – A Philosophical Translation" (2003), Ballantine Books
  2. Ames, Roger, "Focusing the Familiar: A Translation and Philosophical Interpretation of the Zhongyong" (2001), University of Hawaii Press
  3. Chan, Wing-tsit, "Reflections on Things at Hand" (1967), Columbia University Press
  4. Chen, Lai, "朱子哲學硏究" (1988), Chinese Social Science Book Publishing Co
  5. Ching, Julia, "The Religious Thought of Chu Hsi" (2000), Oxford University Press
  6. Cottingham, John, "In the Cambridge Companion to Descartes", pp.236~257 (1992), Cambridge University Press
  7. Descartes, René, "The Philosophical Writings of Descartes" (1985), Cambridge University Press
  8. Graham, A.C., "Disputers of the Tao: Philosophical Argument in Ancient China" (1989), Open Court
  9. "Physicalism" (2001)[URL]
  10. Kim, Jaegwon, "Mind in a Physical World" (1998), The MIT Press
  11. Peterson, Willard J., "Another Look at Li", The Bulletin of Sung-Yuan Studies, (18), pp.13~31 (1986)
  12. Rozemond, M., "A Companion to Descartes", pp.372~389 (2008), Blackwell Publishing Ltd
  13. Tillman, Hoyt C., "Confucian Discourse and Chu Hsi’s Ascendency" (1992), University of Hawaii Press
  14. Williams, Bernard, "Descartes: The Project of Pure Enquiry" (1978), Humanities Press
  15. 朱熹, "四書或問" (1986), Pogyong Publishing Company
  16. 朱熹, "四書章句集註" (1983), Zhonghua shuju
  17. 朱熹, "朱子語類" (1986), Zhonghua Book Publishing Co
  18. 朱熹, "朱子全書" (2003), Shanghai Guji Publishing Co

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)