본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

退溪“体用有二”说刍议 (퇴계의 “체용유이(體用有二)” 설에 대한 소견)

On Yi Hwang's “Dual Ti-Yong Theory”

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

退溪先生在讨论邵雍、朱熹体用论的语境中提出了“体用有二”的观点,认为有形而上道理(理)之体用,又有形而下事物(气)之体用。这一表述中内含着体用关系的第三层含义:理气之体用。考证邵子、朱子体用论的本义,可认为“体用有二”是退溪先生的创造性诠释,因为朱子讲“体用”时则指形体与功用,接近退溪所谓“形而下事物(气)之体用”;而邵子讲“体用”时则专指心之神用,与退溪体用论的问题意识面向不同。

Abstract

In the context of discussing Zhu Xi's and Shao Yong's theory of Ti and Yong, Yi Hwang put forward the viewpoint of "dual Ti-Yong theory", which holds that there are transcendental Ti-Yong theory and phenomenal Ti-Yong theory. This expression contains the third meaning of the relationship between Ti and Yong: noumenon and phenomenon, which also have the relationship between Ti and Yong. By examining the original meaning of Zhu Xi's and Shao Yong's Ti-Yong theory, we can conclude that "dual Ti-Yong theory" is Yi Hwang's creative interpretation, because Zhu Xi's "Ti-Yong theory" refers to body and function, which is close to Yi Hwang's so-called "phenomenal theory of Ti-Yong"; Shao Yong's "Ti-Yong theory" refers to the role of the human mind, which is fundamentally different from Yi Hwang's Ti-Yong theory.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 周敦颐, "周敦颐集" (1990), 中华书局
  2. 朱熹, "周易本义" (2009), 中华书局
  3. 朱熹, "朱子全书" (2002), 上海古籍出版社,安徽教育出版社
  4. 黎靖德, "朱子语类" (1985), 中华书局
  5. 张立文, "退溪书节要" (1989), 中国人民大学
  6. 贾顺先, "退溪全书今注今译" (1993), 四川大学出版社
  7. 牟宗三, "心体与性体" (2013), 吉林出版集团有限责任公司
  8. 唐君毅, "中国哲学原论․原教篇" (2006), 中国社会科学出版社
  9. 陈来, "朱子<太极解义>的哲学建构", 哲学研究, (2) (2018)
  10. 张立文, "安身立命之学的开显——论邵雍的先天之学", 探索与争鸣, (3) (2010)
  11. 张立文, "朱熹与退溪思想比较研究" (2014), 人民出版社
  12. 葛荣晋, "李退溪的理气观", 浙江学刊, (1) (1991)
  13. 杨宪邦, "论退溪学的体用观", 社会科学战线, (4) (1987)
  14. 崔英辰, "韩国儒学思想研究" (2008), 东方出版社
  15. 吴锡源, "韩国儒学的义理思想" (2014), 复旦大学出版社
  16. 李相虎, "朱子学与退溪学研究:中韩性理学之比较" (2015), 厦门大学出版社
  17. 秋制协, "朱子学与退溪学研究:中韩性理学之比较" (2015), 厦门大学出版社
  18. 林映希, "国际易学研究(第6辑)" (2000), 华夏出版社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)