본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

문학 문화의 지형 변화와 문학교육 - 대중문학 수용의 문제를 중심으로 -

The Topography of Literature Culture and Literature Education

0

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

Recent literature education has made efforts to break away from the view of elitism by setting the comprehensive goals of enhancing learners’ literary abilities and promoting the culture of literature in the community dimension. It is also a product of recognizing this problem that, together with the term ‘culture of literature,’ the view of culturology has come to the fore of literature education since the 7th National Curriculum. This paper examined whether the view of culturology is necessary in literature education and whether the current curriculum and textbooks reflect the view of culturology adequately and discussed the future direction of literature education in the topography of contemporary culture. It may be right to see the relation between literature and popular culture more as expansion than as crisis in that all literary works are the outcomes of writers’ expression activities and, at the same time, of interactions with readers. In the 7th National Curriculum, a room was prepared for accommodating popular literature or media texts comprehensively from a culturological view by introducing the term ‘culture of literature.’ As literature is viewed from the viewpoint of culturology, literary works to be included in Korean language and literature textbooks under the 7th National Curriculum could be expanded not only to popular literature but also to popular culture texts such as TV dramas and musical scripts. However, the view of culturology has limitations. For it is more natural to use literary works, which provide learners with more valuable literary experiences, as the media of educational communication in the field of education. In conclusion, considering the current state of literature culture and the peculiarity of literature education, it will be reasonable for literature education: (1) to expand the view of culturology; (2) to switch its focus from literary works to critical activities; and (3) to provide learners with various experiences in creation using digital media and, by doing so, to maximize the effect of transfer and retention of literary experiences in classroom.

Abstract

Recent literature education has made efforts to break away from the view of elitism by setting the comprehensive goals of enhancing learners’ literary abilities and promoting the culture of literature in the community dimension. It is also a product of recognizing this problem that, together with the term ‘culture of literature,’ the view of culturology has come to the fore of literature education since the 7th National Curriculum. This paper examined whether the view of culturology is necessary in literature education and whether the current curriculum and textbooks reflect the view of culturology adequately and discussed the future direction of literature education in the topography of contemporary culture. It may be right to see the relation between literature and popular culture more as expansion than as crisis in that all literary works are the outcomes of writers’ expression activities and, at the same time, of interactions with readers. In the 7th National Curriculum, a room was prepared for accommodating popular literature or media texts comprehensively from a culturological view by introducing the term ‘culture of literature.’ As literature is viewed from the viewpoint of culturology, literary works to be included in Korean language and literature textbooks under the 7th National Curriculum could be expanded not only to popular literature but also to popular culture texts such as TV dramas and musical scripts. However, the view of culturology has limitations. For it is more natural to use literary works, which provide learners with more valuable literary experiences, as the media of educational communication in the field of education. In conclusion, considering the current state of literature culture and the peculiarity of literature education, it will be reasonable for literature education: (1) to expand the view of culturology; (2) to switch its focus from literary works to critical activities; and (3) to provide learners with various experiences in creation using digital media and, by doing so, to maximize the effect of transfer and retention of literary experiences in classroom.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. 구인환, "『문학교육론』(제4판)" (2001), 삼지원
  2. 김남희, "현대시 수용에 관한 문화 기술적 연구", 석사, pp.1997
  3. 김대행, "문학교육원론" (2000), 서울대학교출판부
  4. 김성진, "비평 활동 교육 내용 연구", 박사, pp.2004
  5. 김신정, "다매체 문화 환경과 문학 능력", 문학교육학, (26), pp.37~61 (2008), 한국문학교육학회
  6. 김우창, "경계를 넘어 글쓰기" (2001), 민음사
  7. 김창원, "문학 문화의 개념과 문학교육", 문학교육학, (25), pp.513~544 (2008), 한국문학교육학회
  8. 노은희, "고등학교 국어과 교육과정 해설 연구 개발" (2008), 한국교육과정평가원
  9. 박기범, "제7차 교육과정에 따른 문학 교과서의 내용 분석 연구 -수록된 문학 작품을 중심으로", 문학교육학, (11), pp.83~120 (2003), 한국문학교육학회
  10. 송효섭, "문학 연구의 문화론적 지평b>로", b>실증적·실용적 인문학을 위하여, 2006, pp.(27집), 5~22[DOI]
  11. 신동흔, "문화전환기에 돌아보는 문학의 개념과 위상: 사이버세계, ‘일상의 문학’을 중심으로", 민족문학사연구, (17), pp.72~102 (2000), 민족문학사학회
  12. 우한용, "문학교육과 문화론" (1997), 서울대학교출판부
  13. 유영희, "교과서 문학 제재의 수용 양상 및 특성-제7차 국민공통기본교육과정 교과서를 중심으로", 문학교육학, (11), pp.11~42 (2003), 한국문학교육학회
  14. 윤여탁, "매체언어와 국어교육" (2008), 서울대학교출판부
  15. 이광복, "상호 문화적?미디어적 능력- 독일문학 교육의 목표설정과 관련하여 -", 독어교육, 24, pp.3~74 (2002), 한국독어독문학교육학회
  16. 이화인문과학원, "인터-미디어와 탈경계 문화" (2009), 이화여자대학교출판부
  17. 정재찬, "문학교육의 사회학을 위하여" (2004), 역락
  18. 조남현, "소설교육의 정향과 대중소설 문제", 문학교육학, (7), pp.83~105 (2001), 한국문학교육학회
  19. 최미숙, "한국 모더니즘시의 글쓰기 방식과 시 해석" (2000), 소명출판
  20. 최병우, "대중문학과 대중문화, in 문학의 이해" (1997), 삼지원
  21. Herbert J. Gans, "Popolar Culture and High Culture in 대중문화와 고급문화" (1998), 나남출판
  22. Marshall W. Fishwick, "Popular Culture: Cavespace to Cyberspace, in 대중의 문화사" (2005), 청아출판사
  23. Pierre Lévy, "L'intelligence collective: Pour une anthropologie de cyberspace, in 집단 지성" (2002), 문학과지성사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)