국어교재에 넘나든 현대시 텍스트의 경계와 검열
The Boundaries and Censorship of Modern Poetry Text Listed in Korean Language Textbook
1
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article focuses on how modern poetry text which a counter- subject produced was selected, excluded and reinstated within the korean language textbook. These studies, based on an issue about canon of literature text, should be useful to investigate facts of censorship that influenced in korean language textbooks and a process of canonization for modern poetry. In a number of texts listed in korean language textbook, there were works of mainstream canon and those were not. This involves not only an issue about a canon of literature and education but also ideology which influenced in the process of selection and exclusion. This article considers a nationalistic discourse as the dominant discourse which influenced in the process of canonization for modern poetry. This article mainly tracked the process of canonization for the works of Hwa Lim, Byung- chul Lee and Yong-ahk Lee who fought against the dominant discourse. In a case of Hwa Lim's 『Our brother and Brazier』 and Yong-ahk Lee's 『A Violet』, it was confirmed that those have been naturally selected as a position of mainstream canon through the evaluation of literary circles within literary field, the recording process of anthology and etc. In addition, in a case of 『Wooden Shoes』, it was confirmed that representation of 'Road' is related to the tastes of compliers and the state of a period characterized as ‘building a new country’. On the other hand, it was confirmed that 『Our brother and Brazier』 and 『Wooden Shoes』 were excluded from korean language textbook through the pre-censorship and 『A Violet』 was through the post-censorship. These operations of censorship mechanism no longer made it possible to choose literary texts by compliers' own perspective or taste. Later, these texts have started to be reinstated again into the field of literary education, which was resulted from the consideration for the importance of literary history and the multi-layered meaning of the text itself. In this time when the external operation of the censorship mechanism becomes weakened but the system of pluralistic value gets strengthened, various discourses are still conflicted and adjusted through the process of canonization for literary text. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate continually the spots of literary texts’ the expansion and boundaries within the korean language textbooks.
Abstract
This article focuses on how modern poetry text which a counter- subject produced was selected, excluded and reinstated within the korean language textbook. These studies, based on an issue about canon of literature text, should be useful to investigate facts of censorship that influenced in korean language textbooks and a process of canonization for modern poetry. In a number of texts listed in korean language textbook, there were works of mainstream canon and those were not. This involves not only an issue about a canon of literature and education but also ideology which influenced in the process of selection and exclusion. This article considers a nationalistic discourse as the dominant discourse which influenced in the process of canonization for modern poetry. This article mainly tracked the process of canonization for the works of Hwa Lim, Byung- chul Lee and Yong-ahk Lee who fought against the dominant discourse. In a case of Hwa Lim's 『Our brother and Brazier』 and Yong-ahk Lee's 『A Violet』, it was confirmed that those have been naturally selected as a position of mainstream canon through the evaluation of literary circles within literary field, the recording process of anthology and etc. In addition, in a case of 『Wooden Shoes』, it was confirmed that representation of 'Road' is related to the tastes of compliers and the state of a period characterized as ‘building a new country’. On the other hand, it was confirmed that 『Our brother and Brazier』 and 『Wooden Shoes』 were excluded from korean language textbook through the pre-censorship and 『A Violet』 was through the post-censorship. These operations of censorship mechanism no longer made it possible to choose literary texts by compliers' own perspective or taste. Later, these texts have started to be reinstated again into the field of literary education, which was resulted from the consideration for the importance of literary history and the multi-layered meaning of the text itself. In this time when the external operation of the censorship mechanism becomes weakened but the system of pluralistic value gets strengthened, various discourses are still conflicted and adjusted through the process of canonization for literary text. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate continually the spots of literary texts’ the expansion and boundaries within the korean language textbooks.
참고문헌 (24)
- 조선프로레타리아예술동맹문학부, "카프시인집" (1931), 집단사
- 김동환, "조선명작선집" (1936), 삼천리사
- "신찬시인집" (1940), 시학사
- 조선어학회, "중등국어교본(상)" (1946), 군정청 문교부
- 이용악, "오랑캐꽃" (1947), 아문각
- 임화, "찬가" (1947), 백양당
- 박노갑, "중등국어3" (1949), 금룡도서주식회사
- 임학수, "시집" (1949), 한성도서주식회사
- 김기림, "시론" (1949), 백양당
- 김윤식, "광복후의 국어교육", pp.180~186 (1992), 한샘
- 김창원, "시교육과 정전의 문제", 한국시학연구, (19), pp.63~85 (2007), 한국시학회
- 박용찬, "한국 현대시의 정전과 매체" (2011), 소명출판
- 박용찬, "한국전쟁 직전 국어교재에 실린 문학텍스트의 구성담론과 국가주의 시선으로의 이동", 어문학, (119), pp.223~253 (2013), 한국어문학회
- 백철, "조선신문학사조사 현대편" (1949), 백양당
- 송무, "학교육의 ‘정전’ 논의-영미의 정전 논의를 중심으로", 문학교육학, 1, pp.293~316 (1997), 한국문학교육학회
- 심선옥, "1920~30년대 근대시의 정전화 과정- 시인선집을 중심으로", 상허학보, 20, pp.53~77 (2007), 상허학회
- 윤여탁, "이용악의 「오랑캐꽃」 텍스트의 해석 방법 연구", 한국시학연구, (27), pp.153~172 (2010), 한국시학회
- 윤영천, "이용악시전집", pp.193~251 (1988), 창작과비평사
- 이병기, "가람문선" (1966), 신구문화사
- 이태준, "상허문학독본" (1946), 백양당
- 이희승, "정정(訂正)역대조선문학정화(상)" (1947), 박문출판사
- 鄭在瓚, "現代詩 敎育의 支配的 談論에 관한 硏究", 박사, 국어교육, pp.1996
- 정재찬, "문학교육의 현상과 인식" (2004), 역락
- 정정순, "이용악의 「오랑캐꽃」 해석과 시교육", 문학교육학, (36), pp.421~444 (2011), 한국문학교육학회
