국어과 토론교육의 의의와 발전 방향
For the Development of Debate Education in Korean Language Education
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Recently debate education is going to be regarded as a significant factor to solve current problems in Korean education. In this paper I analyze the major debate education problems in Korean Language Education and suggest a few solutions. First, the major factors preventing improvement of debate education are Korean traditional culture and school system which prefer obedience to debate. Secondly, the National Curriculum and the methods of teaching and learning are consisted with knowledge and segmented functions of debate. Thirdly, there are few teachers who are professional to educate classroom debating process. Fourthly, lack of supporting system and research for debate education in every class. Solutions to this problems are 1) to convert current teacher centered employment of the National Curriculum to student oriented way. 2)to reinforce teacher education for debate education from the course of teaching training. 3)to establish a supporting system to change teaching methods from focusing on basic knowledge and function to have students explore way of problem solving through debating. 4)to activate social debate on the issues of current Korean society and connect it to debate education.
Abstract
Recently debate education is going to be regarded as a significant factor to solve current problems in Korean education. In this paper I analyze the major debate education problems in Korean Language Education and suggest a few solutions. First, the major factors preventing improvement of debate education are Korean traditional culture and school system which prefer obedience to debate. Secondly, the National Curriculum and the methods of teaching and learning are consisted with knowledge and segmented functions of debate. Thirdly, there are few teachers who are professional to educate classroom debating process. Fourthly, lack of supporting system and research for debate education in every class. Solutions to this problems are 1) to convert current teacher centered employment of the National Curriculum to student oriented way. 2)to reinforce teacher education for debate education from the course of teaching training. 3)to establish a supporting system to change teaching methods from focusing on basic knowledge and function to have students explore way of problem solving through debating. 4)to activate social debate on the issues of current Korean society and connect it to debate education.
참고문헌 (25)
- 강태완, "토론의 방법" (1998), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 교육과학기술부, "중학교 교육과정 해설(Ⅱ)" (2007), 교육과학기술부
- 김평원, "마이크로 토론(Micro Debate)을 활용한 CEDA 방식 토론 교육", 국어교육학연구, (39), pp.281~312 (2010), 국어교육학회
- 김혜숙, "생각을 키우는 토론 수업 레시피" (2011), 교육과학사
- 민병곤, "논증 교육의 내용 연구 : 6, 8, 10학년 학습자의 작문 및 토론 분석을 바탕으로", 박사, 국어교육, pp.2004
- 2011국어과 교육과정 개정을 위한 시안 개발 연구, "민현식", 교육과학기술부, ~ (2011)
- 박승억, "토론과 논증" (2005), 형설출판사
- 박재현, "한국의 토론 문화와 토론 교육", 국어교육학연구, (19), pp.289~318 (2004), 국어교육학회
- 유동엽, "논쟁의 불일치 조정 양상에 관한 연구", 박사, 국어교육, pp.2004
- 이선영, "토론 교육 내용 체계 연구 : 초·중·고 토론대회 담화 분석을 바탕으로", 박사, 국어교육, pp.2011
- 이정옥, "토론의 전략" (2007), 문학과지성사
- 이창덕, "화법 교육과정의 문제와 개선 방안", 화법연구, 8, pp.33~69 (2005), 한국화법학회
- 이창덕, "새로운 화법교육 연구의 방향과 과제", 국어교육, (123), pp.53~92 (2007), 한국어교육학회
- 이창덕, "화법교육론" (2010), 역락
- 임칠성, "교육토론의 모형과 의의, In 말하기 듣기 수업 방법론" (2001), 박이정
- 임칠성, "토론의 본질과 토론 지도", 화법연구, (18), pp.103~130 (2011), 한국화법학회
- 전은주, "토론 교수-학습 설계를 위한조건 변인 분석", 국어교육학연구, (20), pp.433~460 (2004), 국어교육학회
- 정문성, "토의토론수업방법36" (2008), 교육과학사
- 최복자, "토론 능력과 토론 교육", 화법연구, 8, pp.349~379 (2005), 한국화법학회
- 한국철학사상연구회, "논쟁으로 보는 한국 철학" (1995), 예문서원
- Andrew, R, "Teaching and Learning Argument" (1995), Cassell
- van Eemeren, F. H, "Argumentation, commuication, and Fallacies. a pragma-dialectical perspective" (1992), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Freely, A. J, "Argumentation and Debate: Critical thinking rot reasoned decision making" (1996), Wadsworth Publishing Company
- Toulmin, S. E, "An Introduction to Reasoning" (1984), Macmillan
- IDEA, "Many Sides: Debate Across the Curriculm", pp.298~300 (2006), Debate Across the Curriculm. A. Snider & M. Schnurer(eds. ), 298-300