성인의 작문과 문법에 대한 인식 및 능력 조사
A Survey on the Adults’ Perception and Ability for Composition and Grammar
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study, the real state of adult’s perception and ability for composition (writing) and grammar was analyzed through a questionnaire survey and paper-and-pencil test. In summary of this survey result, adult were perceiving the ability of writing would be important in official writings such as report official letter, plan, civil complain, etc. and writing actively mainly in media such as SNS and company email. They were also writing relatively often the writings related to their work or for maintaining their social relationship. It was found that the difficulty they felt during writing was different according to the kinds of writing. Any systematic education of grammar for adults after graduating high schools was not conducted properly. They were also perceiving grammar in narrow sense such as normative wording or vocabulary. Most of the respondents thought knowledge of grammar would be helpful for writing, and they responded that they wrote a writing in consideration of grammar not only for avoiding grammatic errors but also for clarifying their thinking and reinforcing the expression effect of phrase. Lastly, it was found that they preferred the grammar skill focusing on content necessary for writing to the current way of grammar skill focusing on knowledge. Next, in summary of paper-and pencil test, the average of total survey subjects was 44.8 points out of 100. In the linguistic layers, marking was the lowest, 23.2 points, vocabulary 37.6, phrase 51.1 and conversation 67.3. In the average of total points, there was no significant difference between pre-society member and society member, male and female, but it showed a significant difference between 20s and over 20s. A comprehensive review on the implication of the results of above survey and paper-and=pencil test verified that there existed a very strong perception that grammar knowledge wold be necessary for adult’s writing and grammar education should be composed of contents necessary for writing rather than focusing on knowledge. It was found that the grammar necessary for writing should be getting over the level of norm and set up to be oriented mainly toward expression to reveal its thoughts more clearly or transfer effectively its intention. In addition, it was found that the education of composition for adult should be made, different from that in school education, intensively for the writing kinds that adults need such as official writings, objective writings, work-oriented writings, writings to maintain social relationship. Lastly, there was almost none of grammar education for adults up to now and, if any, such education focussed on the accuracy of norm. Nevertheless, the grammar ability of adults showed the lowest score. such result implies that it requires reflection and change in all aspects of the current education of Korean language for adult.
Abstract
In this study, the real state of adult’s perception and ability for composition (writing) and grammar was analyzed through a questionnaire survey and paper-and-pencil test. In summary of this survey result, adult were perceiving the ability of writing would be important in official writings such as report official letter, plan, civil complain, etc. and writing actively mainly in media such as SNS and company email. They were also writing relatively often the writings related to their work or for maintaining their social relationship. It was found that the difficulty they felt during writing was different according to the kinds of writing. Any systematic education of grammar for adults after graduating high schools was not conducted properly. They were also perceiving grammar in narrow sense such as normative wording or vocabulary. Most of the respondents thought knowledge of grammar would be helpful for writing, and they responded that they wrote a writing in consideration of grammar not only for avoiding grammatic errors but also for clarifying their thinking and reinforcing the expression effect of phrase. Lastly, it was found that they preferred the grammar skill focusing on content necessary for writing to the current way of grammar skill focusing on knowledge. Next, in summary of paper-and pencil test, the average of total survey subjects was 44.8 points out of 100. In the linguistic layers, marking was the lowest, 23.2 points, vocabulary 37.6, phrase 51.1 and conversation 67.3. In the average of total points, there was no significant difference between pre-society member and society member, male and female, but it showed a significant difference between 20s and over 20s. A comprehensive review on the implication of the results of above survey and paper-and=pencil test verified that there existed a very strong perception that grammar knowledge wold be necessary for adult’s writing and grammar education should be composed of contents necessary for writing rather than focusing on knowledge. It was found that the grammar necessary for writing should be getting over the level of norm and set up to be oriented mainly toward expression to reveal its thoughts more clearly or transfer effectively its intention. In addition, it was found that the education of composition for adult should be made, different from that in school education, intensively for the writing kinds that adults need such as official writings, objective writings, work-oriented writings, writings to maintain social relationship. Lastly, there was almost none of grammar education for adults up to now and, if any, such education focussed on the accuracy of norm. Nevertheless, the grammar ability of adults showed the lowest score. such result implies that it requires reflection and change in all aspects of the current education of Korean language for adult.
참고문헌 (25)
- 이관규, "통합적 문법 교육의 의의와 방법", 문법 교육, (11), pp.259~282 (2009), 한국문법교육학회
- 이삼형, "‘문법’ 영역과 ‘작문’ 영역의 통합 문제", 문법 교육, 12, pp.65~86 (2010), 한국문법교육학회
- 이삼형, "독서(읽기)능력 향상을 위한 문법 내용 개발" (2013), 국립국어원
- 독서(읽기)능력 향상을 위한 문법 교육 자료 개발 연구, "이삼형", 국립국어원, ~ (2014)
- 이삼형, "‘독서 문법’의 가능성 탐색", 국어교육, (145), pp.95~124 (2014), 한국어교육학회
- 이삼형, "작문(쓰기)능력 향상을 위한 문법 내용 개발" (2015), 국립국어원
- 이영주, "통합적 문법 교육의 문제점과 개선 방향", 문법 교육, 7, pp.146~169 (2007), 한국문법교육학회
- 이재승, "통합적 국어교육의 개념과 성격", 한국초등국어교육, (31), pp.171~192 (2006), 한국초등국어교육학회
- 임규홍, "‘문법’과 ‘독서’의 통합성", 문법 교육, 12, pp.39~64 (2010), 한국문법교육학회
- 장소원, "국어 능력 평가를 위한 기초 연구" (2012), 국립국어원
- 전은주, "화법과 문법의 통합 교육 내용 구성", 문법 교육, 12, pp.87~116 (2010), 한국문법교육학회
- 정희모, "작문에서 문법의 기능과 역할", 청람어문교육, (47), pp.137~168 (2013), 청람어문교육학회
- 정희창, "글쓰기의 국어학적 분석", 반교어문연구, (28), pp.57~85 (2010), 반교어문학회
- 주세형, "통합적 문법 교육 내용 설계의 원리와 실제 연구", 박사, 국어교육, pp.2005
- 주세형, "문법 지식과 국어학적 지식의 지평 확장" (2006), 도서출판 역락
- 주재우, "장르 중심의 쓰기교육 연구 - ‘자서전 장르’를 대상으로 -", 작문연구, (14), pp.137~158 (2012), 한국작문학회
- Beers, K, "Contex tualizing grammar" (2001), Voices from the middle
- D. C. Mitchell., "The process of reading: acognitive an alysis of fluen tread in gand learning to read" (1982), John Willey & Sons
- Durkin, D., "Reading comprehen sion in struction in five basal reader series", Reading Research Quarterly (1981)
- Halliday, M. A. K., "Halliday : system and function in language : selected papers" (1976), Oxford University Press
- Halliday, M. A. K., "Language, Context, and text: aspects of language inasocial- sem io tic perspective" (1989), Oxford University press
- Hoover, W. A., "The simpleview of reading. Readingand Writing", An Interdiscip linary Journal, 2, pp.127~160 (1990)
- Kintsch, W., "The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension : Aconstruction - integration model", Psychological Review (1998)
- Mckenna, Michael C, "Assessment for Reading Instuction" (2009)
- Weaver, C. McNally, C., "Togrammarornot to grammar: That is not the question !" (2001), voices from the middle
