음운변동의 개념과 유형
The Concept and Type of Phonological Process
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study attempts to define the concept of ‘phonological process’ and examine its types in modern Korean. With the definition and classification, thus, the status of phonological process in the linguistic system will be reviewed and the characteristic features will be illustrated more closely to the nature of the process. ‘Phonological process’ is a notion in phonology for allomorph realization process, known as ‘morphological alternation’ in morphology. It is a phonological phenomenon caused while phonological rules are working in the morphological process. This phenomenon needs to be clearly distinguished from ‘allophone process’ and ‘phonological change’. For ‘allophone process’ is a allophone realization process that occurs in the pure phonological part, and ‘phonological change’ is a process that restructure morphemes in the morphological part. Even though phonological rules cause both phonological process and morpheme restructuring process, however, the effects of phonological rules in each process are not identical. Phonological process is a synchronic procedure of a linguistic system, while morpheme restructuring process is a diachronic one. Phonological process needs to be examined with morpho-phonemic classification method. In this study, individual phonological processes of contemporary Korean are investigated with the concepts of ‘automaticity’, ‘regularity’, ‘essentiality’, and ‘universality’, which are used to classify morphological alteration. As a result, five classes of modern Korean are suggested as follow; Class Ⅰ: +Regular, +automatic, +Universal, +Essential Class Ⅱ: +Regular, -automatic, +Universal, -Essential, Class Ⅲ: ⅰ) +Regular, -automatic, -Universal, +Essential ⅱ) +Regular, -automatic, -Universal, +Essential, with no phonetic motive ⅲ) +Regular, -automatic, -Universal, +Essential, with no generally categorized conditions
Abstract
This study attempts to define the concept of ‘phonological process’ and examine its types in modern Korean. With the definition and classification, thus, the status of phonological process in the linguistic system will be reviewed and the characteristic features will be illustrated more closely to the nature of the process. ‘Phonological process’ is a notion in phonology for allomorph realization process, known as ‘morphological alternation’ in morphology. It is a phonological phenomenon caused while phonological rules are working in the morphological process. This phenomenon needs to be clearly distinguished from ‘allophone process’ and ‘phonological change’. For ‘allophone process’ is a allophone realization process that occurs in the pure phonological part, and ‘phonological change’ is a process that restructure morphemes in the morphological part. Even though phonological rules cause both phonological process and morpheme restructuring process, however, the effects of phonological rules in each process are not identical. Phonological process is a synchronic procedure of a linguistic system, while morpheme restructuring process is a diachronic one. Phonological process needs to be examined with morpho-phonemic classification method. In this study, individual phonological processes of contemporary Korean are investigated with the concepts of ‘automaticity’, ‘regularity’, ‘essentiality’, and ‘universality’, which are used to classify morphological alteration. As a result, five classes of modern Korean are suggested as follow; Class Ⅰ: +Regular, +automatic, +Universal, +Essential Class Ⅱ: +Regular, -automatic, +Universal, -Essential, Class Ⅲ: ⅰ) +Regular, -automatic, -Universal, +Essential ⅱ) +Regular, -automatic, -Universal, +Essential, with no phonetic motive ⅲ) +Regular, -automatic, -Universal, +Essential, with no generally categorized conditions
참고문헌 (40)
- 고영근, "형태소의 교체와 형태론의 범위 -형태음운론적 교체를 중심으로-", 國語學, (46), pp.19~52 (2005), 국어학회
- 고영근, "우리말 문법론" (2008), 집문당
- 김경아, "형태음운론적 교체와 형태음운부", 형태론, 1(2), pp.305~317 (1999), 형태론 편집위원회
- 김성규, "비자동적 교체의 공시적 기술", 관악어문연구, 13, pp.25~44 (1988), 서울대 국문과
- 김유범, "이형태교체의 조건과 중세국어 이형태교체의 몇 문제", 국어국문학, (149), pp.201~222 (2008), 국어국문학회[DOI]
- 김차균, "음성학과 언어학" (1996), 서울대 출판부
- 민현식, "국어 문법 연구" (1999), 역락
- 박진호, "형태론의 제자리 찾기", 형태론, 1(2), pp.319~340 (1999), 형태론 편집위원회
- 배주채, "(개정판) 국어음운론 개설" (2011), 신구문화사
- 배주채, "(개정판) 한국어의 발음" (2013), 삼경문화사
- 백두현, "한국어 음운론" (2013), 태학사
- 서울대학교 국어교육연구소, "고등학교 문법" (2002), 교육인적자원부
- 송창선, "국어 형태소와 관련된 몇 가지 문제", 언어과학연구, (57), pp.175~196 (2011), 언어과학회
- 송철의, "형태론과 음운론", 국어학, 35, pp.287~311 (2000), 국어학회
- 신승용, "교체의 有無와 규칙의 共時性·通時性", 어문연구, 32(4), pp.63~91 (2004), 한국어문교육연구회
- 신승용, "공시태와 공시적 음운 기술의 대상으로서 진행 중인 변화", 국어국문학, (157), pp.37~60 (2011), 국어국문학회[DOI]
- 신승용, "단어 형성의 공시성ㆍ통시성과 음운 현상의 공시성ㆍ통시성", 國語學, (67), pp.145~166 (2013), 국어학회[DOI]
- 신승용, "교체의 정의와 교체의 해석 그리고 기저형", 한말연구, (35), pp.77~100 (2014), 한말연구학회
- 이문규, "음운 규칙의 공시성과 통시성―진행 중인 음운 변화의 기술 문제를 중심으로―", 한글, (285), pp.71~96 (2009), 한글학회
- 이문규, "(개정판) 국어교육을 위한 현대국어음운론" (2015), 한국문화사
- 이병근, "유음탈락의 음운론과 형태론", 한글, 173(174), pp.223~246 (1981), 한글학회
- 이익섭, "국어문법론" (1983), 학연사
- 이진호, "음운 규칙의 공시성을 바라보는 시각", 國語學, (47), pp.39~63 (2006), 국어학회
- 이진호, "통시적 음운 변화의 공시적 기술" (2008), 삼경문화사
- 이진호, "형태소 교체의 규칙성에 대하여", 國語學, (69), pp.3~29 (2014), 국어학회
- 이진호, "형태소의 교체 조건", 형태론, 17(1), pp.169~183 (2015), 형태론 편집위원회
- 이혁화, "교체에 대하여", 형태론, 4(1), pp.59~80 (2002), 형태론
- 이혁화, "국어 음운론의 용어 ‘반모음, 이중모음, 중성’에 대한 검토", 한글, (296), pp.5~39 (2012), 한글학회[DOI]
- 이홍식, "형태소와 문법 기술", 어문학, (109), pp.1~35 (2010), 한국어문학회
- 전상범, "음운론" (2004), 서울대학교 출판문화원
- 조성식, "영어학사전" (1990), 신아사
- 최명옥, "국어 음운론" (2004), 태학사
- 최명옥, "한국어 형태론의 문제점과 그 대안", 서강인문논총, 22, pp.19~52 (2007)
- 최웅환, "형태소의 유형 분류", 문학과 언어, 30, pp.1~26 (2008), 문학과언어학회
- 황화상, "현대국어 형태론" (2013), 지식과 교양
- 허 웅, "우리 옛말본" (1975), 샘문화사
- 허 웅, "국어 음운학" (1985), 샘문화사
- 허 웅, "20세기 우리말의 형태론" (1995), 샘문화사
- M. Haspelmath, "형태론의 이해" (2015), 역락
- C. F. Hockett, "A Course in Modern Linguistics" (1958), The Macmillan Company