본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

예비 영어교사를 위한 영어 쓰기능력 향상 방안

The effective ways of developing English writing proficiency for pre-service teachers

0

조회

0

다운로드

21

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of this paper is to consider what the requirements are in preparing for the newly reformed English writing test on the English teachers' employment exam and to present effective ways for the test using the combined style of peer-feedback and integrated written feedback in a process-oriented writing procedure. This survey was conducted on 33 pre-service teachers whose major is English education. The questionnaire consists of 23 questions covering areas such as awareness toward the new format of the test and the effects of integrated process-oriented feedback which involves meaning-focused and form-focused feedback by a peer group. The data, which was measured with frequency analysis, shows that the pre-service teachers are in agreement about the necessity of an English writing test and the effects of integrated feedback by a peer group. In addition, they suggest that a more systematic method to improve their writing skills be required, especially in the stages of planning and writing a first draft. Therefore, pre-service teachers should be provided with a more systematic and detailed writing program to improve their English writing proficiency as well as content knowledge about English education theories.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to consider what the requirements are in preparing for the newly reformed English writing test on the English teachers' employment exam and to present effective ways for the test using the combined style of peer-feedback and integrated written feedback in a process-oriented writing procedure. This survey was conducted on 33 pre-service teachers whose major is English education. The questionnaire consists of 23 questions covering areas such as awareness toward the new format of the test and the effects of integrated process-oriented feedback which involves meaning-focused and form-focused feedback by a peer group. The data, which was measured with frequency analysis, shows that the pre-service teachers are in agreement about the necessity of an English writing test and the effects of integrated feedback by a peer group. In addition, they suggest that a more systematic method to improve their writing skills be required, especially in the stages of planning and writing a first draft. Therefore, pre-service teachers should be provided with a more systematic and detailed writing program to improve their English writing proficiency as well as content knowledge about English education theories.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. 김한경, "동료 피드백 훈련이 피드백 활동과 영어 쓰기 능력 및 태도에 미치는 영향", 석사, pp.2010
  2. 문영인, "한국 대학 영작문에 나타나는 동료 수정의 성격", 영어교육, 55(1), pp.119~140 (2000)
  3. 박남식, "영작문교육의 개선을 위한 제언", 언어와 언어학, 8, pp.107~117 (1982)
  4. 박은영, "웹기반 영작문교육에서의 동료수정 양상 연구", 영어어문교육, 10(1), pp.107~126 (2004), 한국영어어문교육학회
  5. 송미정, "문자 피드백의 유형과 영작문 실력 향상간의 관계", 영어교육, 53(2), pp.135~156 (1998)
  6. 이다미, "교사 피드백과 동료 피드백의 비교 연구", 석사, pp.2007
  7. 이미재, "영어 글쓰기: 문제점과 해결방안", 수원대 논문집, 18, pp.13~24 (2000)
  8. 이정원, "과정중심 피드백이 영어 쓰기능력 향상에 미치는 영향", 영어교육, 56(2), pp.265~285 (2001)
  9. 이진영, "영어 읽기 및 쓰기 능력 신장을 위한 요약활동의 효과에 관한 연구", 영어교과교육, 9(1), pp.133~154 (2010), 한국영어교과교육학회
  10. 전영주, "영어활용 영어수업의 이론과 실제", 신영어영문학, 43(43), pp.259~282 (2009), 신영어영문학회
  11. 전영주, "중등 영어 교원 임용시험 2차 영어논술 시험 분석 및 지도방안", 영어영문학연구, 35(4), pp.157~183 (2009), 대한영어영문학회
  12. 전재영, "웹기반 피드백 유형이 대학생들의 영작문 능력과태도에 미치는 영향", 영어어문교육, 11(1), pp.179~202 (2005), 한국영어어문교육학회
  13. 최연희, "영어 쓰기 교육론. in : 영어과 교육론-이론과 실제", pp.337~424 (1999), 한국문화사
  14. Allaei, S. K., "Exploring the dynamics of cross-cultural collaboration in writing classrooms", The Writing Instructor, 10, pp.19~28 (1990)
  15. Arapoff, N., "Writing: A thinking process", TESOL Quarterly, 1, pp.33~39 (1967)
  16. Brown, A. L., "Learning to learn: On training students to learn from texts", Educational Researcher, 10(2), pp.14~21 (1981)
  17. Cault, N., "Comparing teacher and student responses to written work", TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), pp.181~188 (1994)
  18. Jacobs, G. M., "Feedback on student writing: Taking the middle path", Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(3), pp.307~317 (1998)
  19. Kepner, C. G., "An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills", The Modern Language Journal, 75, pp.305~313 (1991)
  20. Lee, Kyonglim, "The Effect of Genre-Based Instruction: Improving English Writing Ability in the Classroom", 영어교육, 61(1), pp.257~281 (2006), 한국영어교육학회
  21. Lockhart, C., "How useful is peer response?", Perspectives, 5(1), pp.17~29 (1993)
  22. Mangelsdorf, K., "Peer reviews in the ESL composition classroom: What do the students think?", ELT Journal, 46, pp.274~284 (1992)
  23. Nelson, G. L., "Peer response groups: Do L2 writers use peer comments in revising their drafts?", TESOL Quarterly, 27, pp.135~142 (1993)
  24. Pincas, A., "Teaching English writing" (1982), Macmillan Education
  25. Semke, H. D., "Effects of the red pen", Foreign Language Annals, 17, pp.195~202 (1984)
  26. Taylor, M., "The effects of text structure instruction on middle-grade students' comprehension and production of expository text", Reading Research Quarterly, 19(2), pp.134~146 (1984)
  27. Tsui, A. B. M., "Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?", Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), pp.147~170 (2000)
  28. Zamel, V., "Responding to student writing", TESOL Quarterly, 19, pp.79~101 (1985)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)