전자문서의 위변조 가능성과 감식에 관한 연구
The Legal Review of the Discovery of Electronically Stored Information
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
An electronic document is not denied the effect as a document just for being in the electronic form unless there is a special regulation by the Framework act on electronic commerce. However, while an actual document is investigated for evidence through the method of documentary evidence, but there is no regulation on how the evidence investigation should be conducted for electronic documents. That is, the legal procedure law for electronic documents rely on the provisions of the civil procedure law which is a general law, and there is no special regulation regarding the probative force as such is yielded to free non-concrete evidence. Therefore, even if the basic conditions of an electronic document are present, such must be verified individually in case the authenticity is in doubt. Therefore, apart from the conditions to secure authenticity of the electronic documents, the method and procedure for authenticity verification are needed. This is a very practical and urgent matter, and thus this report intends to propose a direction in verification and identification of forgery and falsification regarding the forgery/falsification potential of the electronic documents. The verification method of forgery and falsification of an electronic document is first approached from the perspective encompassing the document originally formed electronically and digitalized document, but the detailed verification methods shall be typed. The document originally formed electronically can employ a special system or electronic signature for identification of forgery and falsification to type the verification method. For digitalized documents, such can be classified into those following the notification of Ministry of Knowledge and Economy and those that are not, and the verification method can be typed accordingly. Especially for digitalized documents, if the document has been scanned into an image file, there is the potential to confirm the authenticity of the document through the characteristics in the document scan process and imaging process other than the certification information such as electronic signatures, and moreover, the normal document verification method can be applied to the identification of electronic documents, further improving the authentication of authenticity for electronic documents.
Abstract
An electronic document is not denied the effect as a document just for being in the electronic form unless there is a special regulation by the Framework act on electronic commerce. However, while an actual document is investigated for evidence through the method of documentary evidence, but there is no regulation on how the evidence investigation should be conducted for electronic documents. That is, the legal procedure law for electronic documents rely on the provisions of the civil procedure law which is a general law, and there is no special regulation regarding the probative force as such is yielded to free non-concrete evidence. Therefore, even if the basic conditions of an electronic document are present, such must be verified individually in case the authenticity is in doubt. Therefore, apart from the conditions to secure authenticity of the electronic documents, the method and procedure for authenticity verification are needed. This is a very practical and urgent matter, and thus this report intends to propose a direction in verification and identification of forgery and falsification regarding the forgery/falsification potential of the electronic documents. The verification method of forgery and falsification of an electronic document is first approached from the perspective encompassing the document originally formed electronically and digitalized document, but the detailed verification methods shall be typed. The document originally formed electronically can employ a special system or electronic signature for identification of forgery and falsification to type the verification method. For digitalized documents, such can be classified into those following the notification of Ministry of Knowledge and Economy and those that are not, and the verification method can be typed accordingly. Especially for digitalized documents, if the document has been scanned into an image file, there is the potential to confirm the authenticity of the document through the characteristics in the document scan process and imaging process other than the certification information such as electronic signatures, and moreover, the normal document verification method can be applied to the identification of electronic documents, further improving the authentication of authenticity for electronic documents.
참고문헌 (14)
- 강태원, "민사소송법(제2판)" (2010), 삼영사
- 강현중, "민사소송법" (2004), 박영사
- 박익환, "민사소송법(신정6판)" (2011), 박영사
- 유병현, "민사소송법" (2010), 박영사
- 이시윤, "신민사소송법" (2012), 박영사
- 호문혁, "민사소송법(제7판)" (2011), 법문사
- 전자거래기본법 개정방안 연구, "최승원", 정보통신산업진흥원, ~, pp.정책연구 10-04 (2010)
- "대법원송무예규 제745호", ~ (1999)
- 김진환, "전자거래에 있어서 문서성과 서명성에 관한 고찰", 법조, 515-516, pp.8~9 (1999)
- 노태악, "전자거래에 있어서 계약의 성립을 둘러싼 몇 가지 문제", 법조, 516-517, pp.9~10 (1999)
- 유병현, "민사소송법상 전자문서와 증거", 민사소송 (2002), 한국민사소송법학회
- 조관행, "민사소송법 소송절차편의 개정방향", 저스티스, 34(3) (2001), 한국법학원
- 홍기문, "전자상거래분쟁과 증거, In 민사소송(Ⅱ)" (1999), 한국민사소송법학회
- 황찬현, "전자문서의 민사증거법상의 문제", 법조, 516 (1999), 법조협회
