본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

병존적 채무인수와 채권양도의 경합

A Study on Competition between the Cumulative Assumption of debt and the Assignment of Claim

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

When there is competition between the Assumption of debt and the assignment of claim, it is possible to apply the Assumption of debt to the creditor or any third party together with the assignment of claim. Specifically speaking, the following cases can be applied; (1) When the grantee of bonds fails to acquire the resisting conditions even after the agreement for the assignment of claim is concluded and the guarantor of debts makes a payment prior to its due date after the agreement for the Cumulative Assumption of debt is concluded (the agreement for the assignment of claim - the agreement for the Assumption of debt - payment prior to the due date - preparation of resisting conditions), (2) When the payment is made prior to the due date without the preparation of resisting conditions for the assignment of claim even after the agreement for the assignment of claim is concluded after the conclusion of the agreement for the Assumption of debt (the agreement for the Assumption of debt - the agreement for the assignment of claim - payment prior to the due date - preparation of resisting conditions), (3) When the payment is made by the guarantor of debts prior to the due date even before the assignment of claim due to the agreement for the Assumption of debt (the agreement for the Assumption of debt - payment prior to the due date - the agreement for the assignment of claim - preparation of resisting conditions). In such cases, there is competition between the Assumption of debt and the assignment of claim. According to the current civil laws, the status of the guarantor of debts, who does not have a standardized way of proof, becomes unstable. As a result, it is necessary to protect the guarantor of debts. Therefore, it is thought that the following conditions might be required; (1) The resisting conditions possessed by the guarantor of debts regarding creditors in order to notify creditors of debtors, (2) The resisting conditions for the reversion of debts in terms of the preferential recovery of bonds through the effective argument or setoff for the payment made by the guarantor of debts to creditors in regard to the relationship with any third party, including the grantee of bonds and the execution creditors.

Abstract

When there is competition between the Assumption of debt and the assignment of claim, it is possible to apply the Assumption of debt to the creditor or any third party together with the assignment of claim. Specifically speaking, the following cases can be applied; (1) When the grantee of bonds fails to acquire the resisting conditions even after the agreement for the assignment of claim is concluded and the guarantor of debts makes a payment prior to its due date after the agreement for the Cumulative Assumption of debt is concluded (the agreement for the assignment of claim - the agreement for the Assumption of debt - payment prior to the due date - preparation of resisting conditions), (2) When the payment is made prior to the due date without the preparation of resisting conditions for the assignment of claim even after the agreement for the assignment of claim is concluded after the conclusion of the agreement for the Assumption of debt (the agreement for the Assumption of debt - the agreement for the assignment of claim - payment prior to the due date - preparation of resisting conditions), (3) When the payment is made by the guarantor of debts prior to the due date even before the assignment of claim due to the agreement for the Assumption of debt (the agreement for the Assumption of debt - payment prior to the due date - the agreement for the assignment of claim - preparation of resisting conditions). In such cases, there is competition between the Assumption of debt and the assignment of claim. According to the current civil laws, the status of the guarantor of debts, who does not have a standardized way of proof, becomes unstable. As a result, it is necessary to protect the guarantor of debts. Therefore, it is thought that the following conditions might be required; (1) The resisting conditions possessed by the guarantor of debts regarding creditors in order to notify creditors of debtors, (2) The resisting conditions for the reversion of debts in terms of the preferential recovery of bonds through the effective argument or setoff for the payment made by the guarantor of debts to creditors in regard to the relationship with any third party, including the grantee of bonds and the execution creditors.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. 곽윤직, "민법주해 제Ⅹ권 채권(3)" (1995), 박영사
  2. 곽윤직, "채권총론" (2007), 박영사
  3. 김준호, "채권법" (2012), 법문사
  4. 김형배, "채권총론" (1998), 박영사
  5. 박준서, "주석민법 채권총칙(2)" (2000), 한국사법행정학회
  6. 오시영, "채권총칙" (2009), 학현사
  7. 지원림, "민법강의" (2011), 홍문사
  8. 송호영, "채무인수, 이행인수 및 계약인수에 관한 입법론", 법조, 60(11), pp.58~109 (2011), 법조협회
  9. 오수원, "중첩적 채무인수의 법적 성질과 인수인의 상계- 대법원 1997. 4. 22. 선고 96다56443 판결 -", 법조, 56(1), pp.246~289 (2007), 법조협회
  10. 池田真郎, "債務引受と債権譲渡・差押の競合─一括決済方式における債権譲渡方式と併存的債務引受方式の比較を契機に─", 法学研究, 77(9) (2004)
  11. 稲葉譲, "債權讓渡と債務引受の交錯", NBL, (943) (2010)
  12. 遠藤研一郎, "債務引受のための対抗要件制度の導入可能性", 法學新報, 117(9.10) (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)