민사소송에 있어서의 전자문서의 증거성
Evidentiality of Electronic Documents in Civil Litigation
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The current Civil Procedure Code Article 374, which was newly established at the time when the Civil Procedure Code was completely revised in 2002, prescribed that “as other kind of evidence, the investigation of evidence rather than the documents like things made to contain “drawings, photos, recording tapes, video tapes, magnetic disc for computer, and other information shall be determined by the Supreme Court Rules in accordance with the Rules of Section 3 or Section 5.” This is understood that given the potential appearance of new media, it opens possibilities to use appropriate method of investigation including documentary evidence, verification, and valuation. Rules of Civil Procedure Article 120 prescribes that if message information or drawings and photos are evidential matter, its output documents should be submitted and Article 121 prescribes that the investigation of evidence on the media to be reproduced by recording voice or video relies on verification. Electronic Litigation Act Article 13 specifically specifies the methods of investigating evidence that the electronic document itself is the method of evidence rather than the media containing the electronic document. Rules of Civil Procedure Article 32 and Article 33 implements Electronic Litigation Act Art. 13, but does not prescribe which the evidence investigation of electronic document belongs to, either documentary evidence or verification, expressly. This seems to focus on prescribing the evidence investigation method of electronic documents to avoid practical confusions as precisely as possible. And the legal characteristics can be interpreted as having the purpose to open many interpretive possibilities considering the review of the future technological development or the whole Civil Procedure Code. In paper document procedure, as the original copy of the electronic document printed from a device cannot be filed as records, so it can be seen as verification. But, in electronic document procedure, as the electronic document is directly seen from a computer monitor and filed into the storage folder of recordings in an electronic way as the method of evidence like the other documents, this method of evidence should be seen as documentary evidence. And if voice information or video information can be filed as it is, the evidence investigation procedure of electronic document should comply with the submission of original copy for investigating evidence as the system for documentary evidence, rules of procedure and of evidence including Order to Present/Submit Documents, for this type of evidence investigation is not different from the document information. But, for special circumstances like when there are too much amount of electronic documents or when it’s difficult to decode, the evidence investigation by verification or valuation is possible by an authorized person’s or a party’s application.
Abstract
The current Civil Procedure Code Article 374, which was newly established at the time when the Civil Procedure Code was completely revised in 2002, prescribed that “as other kind of evidence, the investigation of evidence rather than the documents like things made to contain “drawings, photos, recording tapes, video tapes, magnetic disc for computer, and other information shall be determined by the Supreme Court Rules in accordance with the Rules of Section 3 or Section 5.” This is understood that given the potential appearance of new media, it opens possibilities to use appropriate method of investigation including documentary evidence, verification, and valuation. Rules of Civil Procedure Article 120 prescribes that if message information or drawings and photos are evidential matter, its output documents should be submitted and Article 121 prescribes that the investigation of evidence on the media to be reproduced by recording voice or video relies on verification. Electronic Litigation Act Article 13 specifically specifies the methods of investigating evidence that the electronic document itself is the method of evidence rather than the media containing the electronic document. Rules of Civil Procedure Article 32 and Article 33 implements Electronic Litigation Act Art. 13, but does not prescribe which the evidence investigation of electronic document belongs to, either documentary evidence or verification, expressly. This seems to focus on prescribing the evidence investigation method of electronic documents to avoid practical confusions as precisely as possible. And the legal characteristics can be interpreted as having the purpose to open many interpretive possibilities considering the review of the future technological development or the whole Civil Procedure Code. In paper document procedure, as the original copy of the electronic document printed from a device cannot be filed as records, so it can be seen as verification. But, in electronic document procedure, as the electronic document is directly seen from a computer monitor and filed into the storage folder of recordings in an electronic way as the method of evidence like the other documents, this method of evidence should be seen as documentary evidence. And if voice information or video information can be filed as it is, the evidence investigation procedure of electronic document should comply with the submission of original copy for investigating evidence as the system for documentary evidence, rules of procedure and of evidence including Order to Present/Submit Documents, for this type of evidence investigation is not different from the document information. But, for special circumstances like when there are too much amount of electronic documents or when it’s difficult to decode, the evidence investigation by verification or valuation is possible by an authorized person’s or a party’s application.
참고문헌 (33)
- 강현중, "민사소송법" (2004), 박영사
- 전자민사소송에서 당사자의 절차적 권리보장에 관한 연구, "고려대학교 산학협력단", 법원행정처, ~ (2009)
- 김용진, "민사소송법" (2008), 신영사
- 법원행정처, "민사재판운영실무-신모델실무편람" (2002)
- 법원행정처, "법원실무제요 민사소송(Ⅲ)" (2005)
- 이시윤, "신민사소송법" (2012), 박영사
- 정윤하, "민사소송법" (2005), 법문사
- 호문혁, "민사소송법 제7판" (2009), 법문사
- 전자적인 형태의 정보에 관한 증거조사방법 연구, "한양대학교 법학연구소", 법원행정처, ~ (2009)
- 김도훈, "전자증거에 대한 민사소송법상 취급에 관한 연구", 박사, 법학, pp.2008
- 김연, "전자문서에 대한 증거조사", IT와 법연구 (2009)
- 김진환, "전자거래에 있어서의 문서성과 서명성에 관한 고찰(Ⅰ)", 법조, 통권 : 515 (1999)
- 김종호, "미국 뉴욕주 법원의 E-Filing System과 우리 법원의 소송문서 전자관리시스템에 관한 비교연구", 법조, 58(9), pp.241~298 (2009), 법조협회
- 김현철, "전자문서 법제의 동향과 과제", 비교법연구, 10(2) (2010), 동국대비교문화연구원
- 도병현, "민사소송상 전자문서와 증거", 민사소송, (5) (2002)
- 우세나, "민사소송절차의 전자소송화에 대한 고찰 - 민사소송 서류의 전자문서화를 중심으로 -", 민사소송, 13(2), pp.100~124 (2009), 한국민사소송법학회
- 유병현, "민사소송상 전자문서와 증거", 민사소송, Ⅴ (2002), 민사소송법학회
- 유병현, "전자소송절차-전자소송법안을 중심으로", 한일 민사소송법학회 국제학술대회-현대 민사소송의 현황과 과제, 14(2) (2010), 한국민사소송법학회
- 유병현, "전자소송의 내용과 규율방", 고려법학, (62), pp.193~230 (2011), 법학연구원
- 임상혁, "이른바 전자소송법에 대한 비판적 검토 – 문서와 서증의 의미를 중심으로 –", 민사소송, 16(1), pp.459~482 (2012), 한국민사소송법학회[DOI]
- 장완규, "전자소송법의 제정내용과 시사점 -「민사소송 등에서의 전자문서 이용 등에 관한 법률」의 시행에 즈음하여-", 법학논총, 34(1), pp.485~507 (2010), 법학연구소
- 채창옥, "민사소송에 있어서 전자문서에 관한 연구", 석사, 법학, pp.2010
- 한규현, "전자문서와 민사증거법, In CYBER LAW의 제문제(下)" (2003)
- 함윤식, "전자소송 관련 법령의 주요 내용과 쟁점", 법조, 60(4)통권 : 655 (2011)
- 홍기문, "전자상거래 분쟁과 증거", 민사소송, 2 (1999)
- 황찬현, "전자문서의 민사증거법상의 문제", 민사소송, Ⅲ (2000), 한국민사소송법학회지
- Alan Carlson, "Electronic Filing and Service: An Evolution of Practice" (2004), The Justice Management Institute
- Nigel Savage, "The Legal Problems of the Paperless Transactions", The Journal of Business Law (1989)
- Jeffrey, "Electronic Filing Training Materials-Supreme Court And Court of Claims" (2008), New York State Courts Electronic Filing Resource Center
- John T. Matthias, "E-Filing Expansion in State, Local, and Federal Courts", NCSC, ~ (2007)
- Robert C. Meade, Jr., "Electronic Filing in New York State Courts: 2007 Update, 8 No.6 e-Filing Rep.1, July", August, 2007, 2007
- Stephen M. Dorvee, "Electronic Discovery in Technology Litigation", PLI, 2003, pp.734(417), ~
- The National Center for State Courts, "Standards for Electronic Filing Process", ~ (2003)
