본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

국어 교육의 성격과 국어 능력 평가의 한 문제

0

조회

0

다운로드

11

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Is there korean language education in this country? This is my question in this paper. Of course, korean language education is language education, but language education is not korean language education. So korean language department is not only instrumental not also contental. I think that purpose of korean language education is not language usage function enhancement but korean language ability enhancement. Problem is what korean language abililty is. Korean language abililty is to know and use korean language. To know korean language we must study grammar, and to use korean language we must study function and literature. Generally speaking, grammar scope is involved in korean knowing, and function and literature scope are involved in korean using. So we must teach and learn not only grammar as contental, but also function as instrumental. And it is evident that there are evaluation in all education process. In reality College Scholastic Ability Test have effected way of all education. It is prohibited that there are knowledge question in CSAT. But I think there must be contental question in CSAT, because knowledge is base of usage, especially in 21 century knowledge-based society. From now on there must be harmony between knowing and using.

Abstract

Is there korean language education in this country? This is my question in this paper. Of course, korean language education is language education, but language education is not korean language education. So korean language department is not only instrumental not also contental. I think that purpose of korean language education is not language usage function enhancement but korean language ability enhancement. Problem is what korean language abililty is. Korean language abililty is to know and use korean language. To know korean language we must study grammar, and to use korean language we must study function and literature. Generally speaking, grammar scope is involved in korean knowing, and function and literature scope are involved in korean using. So we must teach and learn not only grammar as contental, but also function as instrumental. And it is evident that there are evaluation in all education process. In reality College Scholastic Ability Test have effected way of all education. It is prohibited that there are knowledge question in CSAT. But I think there must be contental question in CSAT, because knowledge is base of usage, especially in 21 century knowledge-based society. From now on there must be harmony between knowing and using.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. 교육부, "국어과 교육과정" (1955), 대한교과서주식회사
  2. 교육인적자원부, "국어과 교육과정, In 한국교육과정평가원 누리집" (2007)
  3. 국립국어연구원, "표준국어대사전" (1999), (주)두산
  4. 김대행, "국어교과학의 지평" (1995), 서울대 출판부
  5. 노명완, "국어교육론" (1988), 한샘
  6. 박덕유, "문법 교육의 발전 방향, In 국어교육론2" (2005), 한국문화사
  7. 박붕배, "한국국어교육전사(상)" (1987), 대한교과서주식회사
  8. 박영목, "국어과 교수 학습론" (2000), 교학사
  9. 이관규, "중등학교 문법 교육의 현황과 과제", 새국어생활, 14(3), pp.69~87 (2004)
  10. 이관규, "한국의 국어정책과 국어교육, 그리고 국어운동", 국어교육, (117), pp.23~68 (2005), 한국어교육학회
  11. 이관규, "세계의 자국어 교육 과정에 대한 연구- 내용 영역을 중심으로", 새국어교육, (72), pp.81~102 (2006), 한국국어교육학회
  12. 최현섭, "국어교과학개론" (1995), 삼지원

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)