본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

과학 글의 레지스터와 장르 연구 사례에 대한 질적 메타분석

Qualitative Meta-Analysis of Studies of Science Register and Genre

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

In this study I reported a qualitative meta-analysis of the studies of science register and science genre on science texts used in scientists communities and school science communities. The process of qualitative meta-analysis consisted of ‘selecting research topic of meta-analysis, literature review and taking sample studies, analyzing within each study – analyzing between studies – synthesizing whole analysis’. Register and genre analysis of science treatise texts showed that the texts had full elements of a genre, logical relations between the consecutive elements, and rich rhetoric expressions for internal logics. In contrast, register and genre analysis of school science texts showed that the relations between sentences were poor in logic and also poor in genre structure including the sub-elements of a genre being spread out without any relation. The register-genre difference between scientists’ texts and school science texts could be the critical points for science learners to enculturate into science. These points, at the same time, give out the problem of stereotyped genre, which makes learners only follow the traditional styles of science writings. Alternative view about genre, however, argues that members in a community construct a specific text structure in the context where they share common goals and practices. Thus science genre should be obtained through social and dynamic practices of science knowledge construction and scientific inquiry by both science educators and learners. Evidence-Explanation Continuum and Evidence-Based Reasoning Framework can be good scaffoldings for socially constructed science genre. This perspective helps us apply genre to improve grammar education.

Abstract

In this study I reported a qualitative meta-analysis of the studies of science register and science genre on science texts used in scientists communities and school science communities. The process of qualitative meta-analysis consisted of ‘selecting research topic of meta-analysis, literature review and taking sample studies, analyzing within each study – analyzing between studies – synthesizing whole analysis’. Register and genre analysis of science treatise texts showed that the texts had full elements of a genre, logical relations between the consecutive elements, and rich rhetoric expressions for internal logics. In contrast, register and genre analysis of school science texts showed that the relations between sentences were poor in logic and also poor in genre structure including the sub-elements of a genre being spread out without any relation. The register-genre difference between scientists’ texts and school science texts could be the critical points for science learners to enculturate into science. These points, at the same time, give out the problem of stereotyped genre, which makes learners only follow the traditional styles of science writings. Alternative view about genre, however, argues that members in a community construct a specific text structure in the context where they share common goals and practices. Thus science genre should be obtained through social and dynamic practices of science knowledge construction and scientific inquiry by both science educators and learners. Evidence-Explanation Continuum and Evidence-Based Reasoning Framework can be good scaffoldings for socially constructed science genre. This perspective helps us apply genre to improve grammar education.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. 나장함, "질적 메타분석에 대한 고찰", 교육과정연구, 26(4), pp.229~252 (2008), 한국교육과정학회[DOI]
  2. 맹승호, "지구과학 논문의 언어 특성 이해: 레지스터 분석", 한국지구과학회지, 31(7), pp.785~797 (2011), 한국지구과학회
  3. 맹승호, "지구과학 논문과 지구과학 교과서 텍스트의 과학 언어적 특성 비교", 한국과학교육학회지, 27(5), pp.367~378 (2007), 한국과학교육학회
  4. 소지영, "과학 교과서의 ‘문법적 은유’를 중심으로 본 국어과의 도구 교과적 본질 탐색", 국어교육연구, (39), pp.119~158 (2017), 국어교육연구소[DOI]
  5. 신명환, "초ㆍ중등 과학 교과서 화산과 지진 관련 단원 글의 언어 구조 비교 분석", 한국지구과학회지, 31(1), pp.36~50 (2010), 한국지구과학회
  6. 신선경, "과학의 언어-이론 구성과 소통 기능을 중심으로-", 사고와표현, 2(1), pp.36~60 (2009), 한국사고와표현학회[DOI]
  7. 이승호, "교사학습공동체의 속성에 관한 질적 메타 분석", 교육학연구, 53(4), pp.77~101 (2015), 한국교육학회
  8. 정은숙, "대기 중 물의 상태변화에 관한 중학생의 글에서 나타나는 의미관계 및 과학 언어적 특성에 관한 예비연구", 한국지구과학회지, 31(3), pp.288~299 (2010), 한국지구과학회
  9. 제민경, "‘장르’ 개념화를 위한 문법교육적 접근", 국어교육학연구, 49(3), pp.393~426 (2014), 국어교육학회[DOI]
  10. 차경미, "과학 글쓰기 유형 및 내용 구성 연구", 국어교육연구, (39), pp.225~260 (2017), 국어교육연구소[DOI]
  11. 차현정, "장르와 레지스터 분석에서 나타난 중학생의 지구과학 주제 글쓰기의 언어적 특징", 한국지구과학회지, 32(1), pp.84~98 (2011), 한국지구과학회
  12. Brown, N. J., "The evidence-based reasoning framework: Assessing scientific reasoning", Educational Assessment, 15, pp.123~141 (2010)
  13. Duschl, R. A., "Everyday assessment in the science classroom", pp.41~59 (2003), NSTA Press
  14. Eggins, S., "An introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics" (2004), Continuum
  15. Fang, Z., "Reading in secondary content areas: A language-based pedagogy" (2008), The University of Michigan Press
  16. Halliday, M. A. K., "Writing science: Literacy and discursive power" (1993), University of Pittsburgh Press
  17. Halliday, M. A. K., "An introduction to Functional Grammar" (2004), Arnold
  18. Lemke, J. L., "Talking science: Language, learning, and values" (1990), Ablex Publishing Corporation
  19. Martin, J. R., "Writing science: Literacy and discursive power", pp.166~202 (1993), University of Pittsburgh Press
  20. Martin, J. R., "Genre and language learning: A social semiotic perspective", Linguistic and Education, 20, pp.10~21 (2009)
  21. Martin, J. R., "Working with Discourse: Meaning beyond the clause" (2003), Continuum
  22. Martin, J. R., "Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science" (1998), Routledge
  23. Noblit, C., "Meta-Ethonography: Synthesizing qualitative studies" (1988), Sage
  24. Reeves, C., "The language of science" (2005), Routledge
  25. Schleppegrell, M. J., "The language of schooling: A Functional Linguistics Perspective" (2004), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  26. Unsworth, L., "Evaluating the language of different types of explanations in junior high school science texts", International Journal of Science Education, 23, pp.585~609 (2001)
  27. Veel, R., "Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school", pp.161~195 (1997), Continuum
  28. Walsh, D., "Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: A literature review", Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50, pp.204~211 (2004)
  29. Wells, C. G., "Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education" (1999), Cambridge University Press
  30. Westby, C., "Developing scientific literacy: A sociocultural approach", Remedial and Special Education, 21, pp.101~110 (2000)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)